SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Helping OTT Sign Pinto

Créé par: KingofRnR
Équipe: 2023-24 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 20 oct. 2023
Publié: 20 oct. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
OTT’s Loaded with LD’s and this gives them more time to Trade either Kubalik or Joseph, if Kylington ever returns
Transactions
CGY
  1. Bernard-Docker, Jacob
  2. Brännström, Erik
  3. Kastelic, Mark
  4. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
Conditional 4th RD Pick Payable if Kylington Returns and Plays 5+ Regular and/or Playoff Games
OTT
  1. Gilbert, Dennis (381 250 $ retained)
  2. Kylington, Oliver
  3. Pospisil, Martin
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Really like Gilbert, but Brannstrom is an Upgrade and Potential Long-Term Replacement for Hanifin
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de OTT
Logo de CGY
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
2026
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
Logo de CGY
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $76 328 750 $0 $850 000 $7 171 250 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Flames de Calgary
10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 800 000 $5 800 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
AG, AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
825 000 $825 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
835 000 $835 000 $
C, AD
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Flames de Calgary
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
805 000 $805 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
775 000 $775 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AG, AD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 oct. 2023 à 18 h 27
#1
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
I didn’t think much of Brannstrom, but @Ledge&Dairy likes him and with the Kylington situation, maybe there’s an opportunity for CGY to take advantage of OTT’s Pinto situation at the same time as well
20 oct. 2023 à 18 h 32
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,010
Mentions "j'aime": 20,017
Simplify this. Brannstrom to Calgary for a pick and a contract under 1M (Oesterle for example)

No reason to include Kylington as his contract doesn't help Ottawa at all
20 oct. 2023 à 18 h 35
#3
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,975
Mentions "j'aime": 4,490
This trade is a hot mess for Ottawa and it heavily favours Calgary.

Ottawa declines.
20 oct. 2023 à 18 h 39
#4
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Simplify this. Brannstrom to Calgary for a pick and a contract under 1M (Oesterle for example)

No reason to include Kylington as his contract doesn't help Ottawa at all

That would only open up $1-1.25mil for OTT, unless they immediately waived the player we send them I guess, but that’s still only $2mil out and they need to come up with at least $2.5mil for Pinto. AND we’d then have cap issues if Kylington returned…. OTT likely still intends to move Kubalik, in which case they’d have the Cap Space should Kylington ever return

I’ve had my eye on Former Calgary Hitmen Kastelic for awhile and we could use more depth at RD, so bringing JBD, who is pretty much a Fringe NHL’er/Waiver Fodder at this time, closer to home might be a nice change of scenery and new opportunity for him. Besides, they still have Lassi Thomson
20 oct. 2023 à 19 h 2
#5
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: sensonfire
This trade is a hot mess for Ottawa and it heavily favours Calgary.

Ottawa declines.

That’s certainly debatable.

Question, do you want Pinto happy and in the lineup or do you not care!? Should he just sit at home until Dorion is finally good & ready to pay assets to another Team to help them out!?
20 oct. 2023 à 19 h 30
#6
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,975
Mentions "j'aime": 4,490
Quoting: KingofRnR
That’s certainly debatable.

Question, do you want Pinto happy and in the lineup or do you not care!? Should he just sit at home until Dorion is finally good & ready to pay assets to another Team to help them out!?


1. We want Pinto back in the lineup under a scenario that makes sense.

Your scenario doesn't make any sense whatsoever.



2. If signing Pinto means making a trade, we will do so if the trade does not harm our interests.

This trade harms our interests, given that it's a hot mess.

For instance, when is Kylington coming back from LTIR ??



3. There are 30 other teams to trade with.

We are not going to be coerced into making a trade with Calgary because some random Flames fan threw a bunch of junk into an AGM to see what would stick.

Ottawa declines.

Try again.
20 oct. 2023 à 20 h 33
#7
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: sensonfire

This trade harms our interests

You’ll have to explain how this Trade harms OTT’s interest when they’d be inserting Pinto in to the lineup and ending the delay and frustrations

Who cares if/when Kylington returns. Brannstrom is the only thing of value returning to the Flames and a 2nd + Gilbert 50% retained is more than fair. Not very many ppl are high on Brannstrom these days
20 oct. 2023 à 20 h 50
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,010
Mentions "j'aime": 20,017
Quoting: KingofRnR
That would only open up $1-1.25mil for OTT, unless they immediately waived the player we send them I guess, but that’s still only $2mil out and they need to come up with at least $2.5mil for Pinto. AND we’d then have cap issues if Kylington returned…. OTT likely still intends to move Kubalik, in which case they’d have the Cap Space should Kylington ever return

I’ve had my eye on Former Calgary Hitmen Kastelic for awhile and we could use more depth at RD, so bringing JBD, who is pretty much a Fringe NHL’er/Waiver Fodder at this time, closer to home might be a nice change of scenery and new opportunity for him. Besides, they still have Lassi Thomson


Well wasting a retention spot on 380k is pretty much irrelevant cap wise. No matter what Ottawa will have to shorten their bench if they decide moving Brannstrom is the right choice to fit Pinto

If Ottawa intends to move Kubalik they won't even bother with trading Brannstrom. Right now Kylington sits as a problem, his trade value until he plays is negative. There is no reason for any other team to consider taking on that uncertainty unless they have more than enough cap space to fit him already
sensonfire et Xspyrit a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2023 à 21 h 2
#9
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,975
Mentions "j'aime": 4,490
Quoting: KingofRnR
You’ll have to explain how this Trade harms OTT’s interest when they’d be inserting Pinto in to the lineup and ending the delay and frustrations

Who cares if/when Kylington returns. Brannstrom is the only thing of value returning to the Flames and a 2nd + Gilbert 50% retained is more than fair. Not very many ppl are high on Brannstrom these days


If Kylington returns at any point during the season, Ottawa assumes his cap hit.

That would put Ottawa over the cap.

Of course, you wouldn't care because it wouldn't be Calgary's problem anymore ...



Ledge_And_Dairy is also trying to talk some sense into you and you're not listening ...
20 oct. 2023 à 21 h 5
#10
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Well wasting a retention spot on 380k is pretty much irrelevant cap wise. No matter what Ottawa will have to shorten their bench if they decide moving Brannstrom is the right choice to fit Pinto

If Ottawa intends to move Kubalik they won't even bother with trading Brannstrom. Right now Kylington sits as a problem, his trade value until he plays is negative. There is no reason for any other team to consider taking on that uncertainty unless they have more than enough cap space to fit him already

You’ll have to check out the other post of this trade in reverse and you’ll see how tight it is already with 21 players

Kubalik makes the most sense to move, but they haven’t been able to…. so Brannstrom is the next most logical trade piece considering Joseph is playing well right now

I’m any event, I tried one for you Ledge, but I don’t even think this one’s that good for CGY. Gilbert’s playing pretty good hockey right now

I can accept Kylington has no value, but I don’t agree he has negative value. He doesn’t affect anything while on LTIR and could return and take off where he left off. It’s a lottery pick up with little to no risk AFAIC
20 oct. 2023 à 21 h 10
#11
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: sensonfire
If Kylington returns at any point during the season, Ottawa assumes his cap hit.

That would put Ottawa over the cap.

Of course, you wouldn't care because it wouldn't be Calgary's problem anymore ...



Ledge_And_Dairy is also trying to talk some sense into you and you're not listening ...

Again, so what!? A Healthy Kylington > Brannstrom and Kubalik

I clearly said it allows the Sens to get Pinto and the lineup and gives them more time to make other moves that are hopefully more favourable than having to pay to dump a player. The likelihood of Kylington returning is not very high imo

It’s a Fair Trade in my eyes, but you’re free to think of it however you like, no sweat off my sac
Talking_Senators a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2023 à 21 h 27
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Modifié 20 oct. 2023 à 21 h 36
Quoting: KingofRnR
That would only open up $1-1.25mil for OTT, unless they immediately waived the player we send them I guess, but that’s still only $2mil out and they need to come up with at least $2.5mil for Pinto. AND we’d then have cap issues if Kylington returned…. OTT likely still intends to move Kubalik, in which case they’d have the Cap Space should Kylington ever return

I’ve had my eye on Former Calgary Hitmen Kastelic for awhile and we could use more depth at RD, so bringing JBD, who is pretty much a Fringe NHL’er/Waiver Fodder at this time, closer to home might be a nice change of scenery and new opportunity for him. Besides, they still have Lassi Thomson

Trading Brannstrom is useless as it opens only 1.225 AAV AT MOST because someone need to replace his spot on the roster.

Giving up Brannstrom, Kastelic, JBD and a 4th for a 2nd is not interesting at all. Plus the Sens would be adding the Kylington problem... if he returns then have to clear another 2.5 AAV

If the Sens move Kubalik, then they don't need to move Brannstrom who is actually quite important on defense because Kleven is not fully ready and he`s the only one who could play Top-4 if there is an injury and actually do well

This trades serves Calgary's interest as you list, but not Ottawa's

Pass.

Quoting: KingofRnR
That’s certainly debatable.

Question, do you want Pinto happy and in the lineup or do you not care!? Should he just sit at home until Dorion is finally good & ready to pay assets to another Team to help them out!?

This doesn`t get Pinto in the lineup at all.

Quoting: KingofRnR
You’ll have to explain how this Trade harms OTT’s interest when they’d be inserting Pinto in to the lineup and ending the delay and frustrations.

Brannstrom is the Sens #5 and one of the best 3rd pairing D-man in the league, he just turned 24 y/o

Kastelic is the Sens 4th line C and was Top-12 in FO% as a rookie. He's huge and initimidating

JBD and a 4th is worth maybe a 3rd

So Brannstrom + Kastelic + 3rd for a 2nd? It harms our interests and doesn't even create the cap space needed to sign Pinto WHILE making the defense and bottom-6 depth much worse

Quoting: KingofRnR
Kubalik makes the most sense to move, but they haven’t been able to…. so Brannstrom is the next most logical trade piece considering Joseph is playing well right now

You can't make assumptions based on a lack of information. As far as we know, Dorion has not even tried to trade Kubalik so maybe he's just not there yet (even if he should have been for a while)
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2023 à 21 h 32
#13
sensonfire
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2021
Messages: 11,975
Mentions "j'aime": 4,490
Quoting: KingofRnR
Again, so what!? A Healthy Kylington > Brannstrom and Kubalik

I clearly said it allows the Sens to get Pinto and the lineup and gives them more time to make other moves that are hopefully more favourable than having to pay to dump a player. The likelihood of Kylington returning is not very high imo

It’s a Fair Trade in my eyes, but you’re free to think of it however you like, no sweat off my sac


1. Kubalik isn't in this trade, so your comparison is irrelevant.

2. Ottawa doesn't want Kylington and I'm sorry you're struggling to understand that.
20 oct. 2023 à 21 h 36
#14
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: Xspyrit
Trading Brannstrom is useless as it opens only 1.225 AAV AT MOST because someone need to replace his spot on the roster.

Giving up Brannstrom, Kastelic, JBD and a 4th for a 2nd is not interesting at all. Plus the Sens would be adding the Kylington problem... if he returns then have to clear another 2.5 AAV

If the Sens move Kubalik, then they don't need to move Brannstrom who is actually quite important on defense because Kleven is not fully ready and he`s the only one who could play Top-4 if there is an injury and actually do well

This trades serves Calgary's interest as you list, but not Ottawa's

Pass.


This doesn`t get Pinto in the lineup at all.


Brannstrom is the Sens #5 and one of the best 3rd pairing D-man in the league, he just turned 24 y/o

Kastelic is the Sens 4th line C and was Top-12 in FO% as a rookie. He's huge and initimidating

JBD and a 4th is worth maybe a 3rd

So Brannstrom + Kastelic + 3rd for a 2nd? It harms our interests and doesn't even create the cap space needed to sign Pinto WHILE making the defense much worse

Yes it does, see here: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4651238

Anyways, don’t worry about it. I don’t even want Brannstrom. I’d prefer to keep Gilbert now. That’s exactly why I want Kastelic and JBD doesn’t really have any value at the moment actually, he’s a Waiver pickup
20 oct. 2023 à 21 h 37
#15
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: sensonfire
1. Kubalik isn't in this trade, so your comparison is irrelevant.

2. Ottawa doesn't want Kylington and I'm sorry you're struggling to understand that.

Trust me, I really don’t care, I’m sorry you’re struggling to accept that 🤷‍♂️
Talking_Senators a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2023 à 22 h 9
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,010
Mentions "j'aime": 20,017
Quoting: KingofRnR
You’ll have to check out the other post of this trade in reverse and you’ll see how tight it is already with 21 players

Kubalik makes the most sense to move, but they haven’t been able to…. so Brannstrom is the next most logical trade piece considering Joseph is playing well right now

I’m any event, I tried one for you Ledge, but I don’t even think this one’s that good for CGY. Gilbert’s playing pretty good hockey right now

I can accept Kylington has no value, but I don’t agree he has negative value. He doesn’t affect anything while on LTIR and could return and take off where he left off. It’s a lottery pick up with little to no risk AFAIC


I agree on Kubalik being the best option for trading but he will likely cost assets to move. Brannstrom makes sense because he doesn't have negative value.

It's also worth noting that as long as Ottawa isn't using LTIR they will accrue cap space as the season goes on. That will lead to a prorated cap hit for whenever Pinto signs too.

Kylington has negative value to any team that can not fit him under the cap when healthy. Ottawa is one of those teams. The uncertainty around him makes him very difficult to move and with so many teams right up against the cap the amount of actual suitors is very limited.
KingofRnR et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2023 à 22 h 13
#17
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I agree on Kubalik being the best option for trading but he will likely cost assets to move. Brannstrom makes sense because he doesn't have negative value.

It's also worth noting that as long as Ottawa isn't using LTIR they will accrue cap space as the season goes on. That will lead to a prorated cap hit for whenever Pinto signs too.

Kylington has negative value to any team that can not fit him under the cap when healthy. Ottawa is one of those teams. The uncertainty around him makes him very difficult to move and with so many teams right up against the cap the amount of actual suitors is very limited.

Makes sense and I’m fine with all that

In the meantime, Pinto continues to sit out…
20 oct. 2023 à 22 h 13
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Quoting: KingofRnR
Yes it does, see here: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/4651238

Anyways, don’t worry about it. I don’t even want Brannstrom. I’d prefer to keep Gilbert now. That’s exactly why I want Kastelic and JBD doesn’t really have any value at the moment actually, he’s a Waiver pickup

Yes I commented there as well...

Why would Ottawa make this trade instead of SIMPLY trading the UFA-to-be Kubalik if it is to play him on the 4th line?

All that for a 2nd? Makes the defense worse, makes the bottom-6 worse and add a POTENTIAL problem in Kyllington?

Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I agree on Kubalik being the best option for trading but he will likely cost assets to move.

Why would Kubalik cost assets to move? 1 year, 2.5 AAV, scored 20 goals and 45 pts last season which is the same production as Dube and just 10 pts off Huberdeau. 2 more pts than Mangiapane.. who makes 5.8 AAV for 2 years. Imagine what it would cost to move them...
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2023 à 22 h 17
#19
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: Xspyrit
Yes I commented there as well...

Why would Ottawa make this trade instead of SIMPLY trading the UFA-to-be Kubalik if it is to play him on the 4th line?

All that for a 2nd? Makes the defense worse, makes the bottom-6 worse and add a POTENTIAL problem in Kyllington?

Maybe, maybe not. Does adding Pinto really make the Bottom 6 worse!? I think Gilbert would surprise you. OTT could probably use a tough guy like him too and he ain’t too shabby in every other facet of the game

Yes, they should move Kubalik. What’s taking so long already!? Maybe nobody wants him!? Anyways, just an idea. You can love it or hate it all you want my friend
20 oct. 2023 à 22 h 26
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Quoting: KingofRnR
Maybe, maybe not. Does adding Pinto really make the Bottom 6 worse!? I think Gilbert would surprise you. OTT could probably use a tough guy like him too and he ain’t too shabby in every other facet of the game

Yes, they should move Kubalik. What’s taking so long already!? Maybe nobody wants him!? Anyways, just an idea. You can love it or hate it all you want my friend

Finally some good points, I shouldn't have said bottom-6 because it includes Pinto line but it would make the 4th line worse

It's true that Gilbert retention makes it possible but I still would MUCH rather have Pinto + Brannstrom + Kastelic than Kubalik + Gilbert + Popisil

I don't know why Dorion hasn't moved Kubalik yet and we haven't even heard his name in the rumors/speculation. IMO he wants to "save face" with the DeBrincat trade... but the fool won't no matter what
KingofRnR et sensonfire a aimé ceci.
20 oct. 2023 à 22 h 31
#21
Démarrer sujet
TrevorA
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 6,876
Mentions "j'aime": 1,874
Quoting: Xspyrit
Finally some good points, I shouldn't have said bottom-6 because it includes Pinto line but it would make the 4th line worse

It's true that Gilbert retention makes it possible but I still would MUCH rather have Pinto + Brannstrom + Kastelic than Kubalik + Gilbert + Popisil

I don't know why Dorion hasn't moved Kubalik yet and we haven't even heard his name in the rumors/speculation. IMO he wants to "save face" with the DeBrincat trade... but the fool won't no matter what

Yeah it’s strange. Who knows what’s really going on

All we can do is speculate and try to come up with opinions and ideas as to why and what to do to fix it

Of course I want the trade to be in my teams favour. Teams know OTT’s situation and they’re going to make Dorion pay and he hasn’t been willing to concede yet is my best guess. I just worry whether Pinto will be as patient as Dorion and how it could affect not only their relationship but Pinto wanting to be a Sen long-term. Again, I’m just speculating and trying to come up with ideas or solutions
20 oct. 2023 à 22 h 34
#22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,514
Mentions "j'aime": 3,728
Quoting: KingofRnR
Yeah it’s strange. Who knows what’s really going on

All we can do is speculate and try to come up with opinions and ideas as to why and what to do to fix it

Of course I want the trade to be in my teams favour. Teams know OTT’s situation and they’re going to make Dorion pay and he hasn’t been willing to concede yet is my best guess. I just worry whether Pinto will be as patient as Dorion and how it could affect not only their relationship but Pinto wanting to be a Sen long-term. Again, I’m just speculating and trying to come up with ideas or solutions

Dorion should be out of the door soon, Pinto wants to be part of it with his friends (I think he's good friends with Sanderson who is the Sens best player going forward)

He'll wait him out.
sensonfire a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage