Quoting: CCM46
Why should I do the work to prove your point???? That would be like me telling you that the sky is blue and then telling you to do the work to prove its not the case. If you want to make a claim and state its factual have all the facts to back it up don't shortcut its not how things work.
I gave you the facts already. There's enough information there, I'm sorry that you can't figure out math and logic on your own. **** school system.
Look, I'll walk you through it. Here's the information I posted earlier:
Quote:
Bouchard overall: 1.21 P/60 in 1234:46
Bouchard w/97: 1.19 in 452:58
Bouchard w/29: 1.11 in 377:31
The OVERALL line: if we take 1.21, divide by 60 (the "/" means divide) and multiply the result by 1234:46 we see that Bouchard scored 25 points at 5v5 overall.
The W/97 line: 1.19, divide by 60, multiply by 452:58 we see that Bouchard scored 9 points with McDavid in the ice.
The W/29 line: 1.11, divide by 60, multiply by 337:31 we see that Bouchard scored 5 points with Draisaitl on the ice.
Now here's the magic bit: we can take away the "w/97" numbers from the "overall" numbers to see how Bouchard performed without his all-world teammates! Like this:
For TOI, 1234:46 minus 452:58 equals 781:48. That's how much
time Bouchard played when McDavid was
not on the ice. Now we take points, 25 minus 9 equals 16. That's how many
points Bouchard scored when McDavid was
not on the ice.
Now we reverse the previous equation like so: 16 points, divided by 781:48, multiplied by 60 = 1.23 P/60.
Neat, eh? So Bouchard scored slightly better
without McDavid (1.23) than he did
with McDavid (1.19).
It's very simple math, really. Do you want me to do the Draisaitl calculations for you too, or do you think you can manage those on your own?