SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Leafs All-in

Créé par: Sjohns8888
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 1 août 2023
Publié: 1 août 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Would have to pay a premium to get lindholm 50% retained
NHL ready top 4 D
Leafs top 2 prospects
1st

Might be an overpay but this move allows Tavares to slide over to the wing and you replace him with a premier two way C.

Still have depth in the farm system to make a move or two at the deadline if you want to fortify the bottom D pairing.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
1775 000 $
Transactions
1.
PHI
  1. Järnkrok, Calle
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Lindholm, Elias (2 425 000 $ retained)
CGY
  1. Liljegren, Timothy
  2. Minten, Fraser
  3. Niemelä, Topi
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de NYI
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2026
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2183 500 000 $83 372 283 $0 $0 $127 717 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
2 425 000 $2 425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 400 000 $2 400 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 550 000 $3 550 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Flyers de Philadelphie
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
775 000 $775 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
1 août 2023 à 8 h 14
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,668
Mentions "j'aime": 19,769
Calgary will almost certainly get an offer with higher quality
1 août 2023 à 8 h 22
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,536
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Calgary will almost certainly get an offer with higher quality


Its funny that for Nylander people cry hes a rental and not worth anything but somehow Lindhome is worth more than 4 quality pieces
1 août 2023 à 8 h 24
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2023
Messages: 3,625
Mentions "j'aime": 1,222
‘Might be an overpay’ 🤦🏻. Absolutely way too much (4 premium assets) for rental C that doesn’t drive his own line. Unless he’s playing with superstars, he puts up 50-60 points.
1 août 2023 à 8 h 46
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,668
Mentions "j'aime": 19,769
Quoting: kous
Its funny that for Nylander people cry hes a rental and not worth anything but somehow Lindhome is worth more than 4 quality pieces


I never said Nylander is not worth anything. I would say him and Lindholm have very similar value. The issue with the trade is it's quantity not quality. A player like Lindholm or Nylander should absolutely return a 1st and a top 50 prospect, and probably some sort of lesser additions after that. The value is certainly there in a vacuum but it lacks a top end prospect.

For example would you trade Nylander at 50% for Del Bel Belluz + Ceulemans + Boqvist + protected 1st?
1 août 2023 à 8 h 53
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,668
Mentions "j'aime": 19,769
Quoting: MitchJr
‘Might be an overpay’ 🤦🏻. Absolutely way too much (4 premium assets) for rental C that doesn’t drive his own line. Unless he’s playing with superstars, he puts up 50-60 points.


rose coloured glasses much? 4 premium assets is quite a way to describe a B level prospect, a B+ level prospect, 2nd pairing defenseman and a late 1st. Also complete disrespect on Lindholm, sure he is not an offensive play driver but he is an incredible 2-way supporting player. Bergeron and prime Toews were the ultimate example of this type of player, Couturier (before he got hurt) and Kopitar are other great examples of a player that does a lot of the dirty work to allow others to succeed so well offensively
1 août 2023 à 9 h 6
#6
Rip
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 11,876
Mentions "j'aime": 3,155
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
rose coloured glasses much? 4 premium assets is quite a way to describe a B level prospect, a B+ level prospect, 2nd pairing defenseman and a late 1st. Also complete disrespect on Lindholm, sure he is not an offensive play driver but he is an incredible 2-way supporting player. Bergeron and prime Toews were the ultimate example of this type of player, Couturier (before he got hurt) and Kopitar are other great examples of a player that does a lot of the dirty work to allow others to succeed so well offensively


Niemela was named the top defenceman at the world Juniors. Go look at the last 25 players to do so and then say he's a b prospect. Liljegren is already a top 4 defenceman and is only 24. Minten is also much better than a B prospect. It's very clear you hate the Leafs with takes like these.
1 août 2023 à 9 h 20
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,536
Mentions "j'aime": 323
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I never said Nylander is not worth anything. I would say him and Lindholm have very similar value. The issue with the trade is it's quantity not quality. A player like Lindholm or Nylander should absolutely return a 1st and a top 50 prospect, and probably some sort of lesser additions after that. The value is certainly there in a vacuum but it lacks a top end prospect.

For example would you trade Nylander at 50% for Del Bel Belluz + Ceulemans + Boqvist + protected 1st?


I was not saying you but the site in general.
1 août 2023 à 9 h 41
#8
Danny B is here
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 5,063
Mentions "j'aime": 1,969
Flyers probably accept
1 août 2023 à 9 h 44
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 87
Mentions "j'aime": 16
Quoting: MitchJr
‘Might be an overpay’ 🤦🏻. Absolutely way too much (4 premium assets) for rental C that doesn’t drive his own line. Unless he’s playing with superstars, he puts up 50-60 points.


Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
rose coloured glasses much? 4 premium assets is quite a way to describe a B level prospect, a B+ level prospect, 2nd pairing defenseman and a late 1st. Also complete disrespect on Lindholm, sure he is not an offensive play driver but he is an incredible 2-way supporting player. Bergeron and prime Toews were the ultimate example of this type of player, Couturier (before he got hurt) and Kopitar are other great examples of a player that does a lot of the dirty work to allow others to succeed so well offensively


I see it from both sides here but that’s why I mentioned above. It is a lot to give up but lindholm is a premier 2-way C. He was a Selke candidate in 21-22 and is a season removed from 40 goals. Yes he was playing with premier talent but he would also be in Toronto. We have a ton of scoring talent already but adding his defensive abilities would put this team over the top.

Lilly is the big “top 50” prospect you’d be referring to as he is a former 1st round pick and is already a top 4 dman at the age of 24 (on a great contract). Niemela is an A- prospect (size is probably the only question for him at the NHL level), Minten is probably a B prospect at this point and a late 1st (what you would get from any team acquiring him). This is a great return for him and as mentioned above is probably an over pay but for a top tier player like lindholm at 50% retained, that is most likely the cost.

He has similar value to nylander and if the leafs were shipping him out for futures that is the kind of package I would want in return.
1 août 2023 à 10 h 9
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 566
Mentions "j'aime": 159
Flyers all out if the return on Seeler is a 4th and Jankrok
1 août 2023 à 10 h 46
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,668
Mentions "j'aime": 19,769
Quoting: Sjohns8888
I see it from both sides here but that’s why I mentioned above. It is a lot to give up but lindholm is a premier 2-way C. He was a Selke candidate in 21-22 and is a season removed from 40 goals. Yes he was playing with premier talent but he would also be in Toronto. We have a ton of scoring talent already but adding his defensive abilities would put this team over the top.

Lilly is the big “top 50” prospect you’d be referring to as he is a former 1st round pick and is already a top 4 dman at the age of 24 (on a great contract). Niemela is an A- prospect (size is probably the only question for him at the NHL level), Minten is probably a B prospect at this point and a late 1st (what you would get from any team acquiring him). This is a great return for him and as mentioned above is probably an over pay but for a top tier player like lindholm at 50% retained, that is most likely the cost.

He has similar value to nylander and if the leafs were shipping him out for futures that is the kind of package I would want in return.


To each their own. I think you are overvaluing your prospects and Liljegren a bit much here. Maybe I need a better example.
IMO this would essentially be the same as me offering
Dube (equivalent to Liljegren)
Poirier (bit more valuable than Neimela)
Ronni (bit less valuable than Minten)
1st
For
Nylander (50%)

Again I don't think the overall sum of parts is bad, it just lacks that grade A quality piece than 2 lesser pieces.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage