I'm surprised Garland and Murray aren't here but Kampf is

check my comment on the thompson contract its such a great contract

Jack Hughes

It is now 52% but was deeply negative early after he signed.

(I love reading that thread)

And the r/hockey thread. Talk about aging poorly

I don't think Miles Wood was bad, but Ross Colton isn't great

Most of these are still deserving of the criticism. The few that shouldn’t be viewed negatively include Thompson, Kotkaniemi, Cernak, and Samuelsson, as well as a couple of others. But a lot of these deals are not going to age well.

Schmaltz’s deal is good

Miles Wood for 6 years is insane

Handing out 6 years to a bottom 6 players is never smart. There’s literally no reason to do so

Forgot werenski. he made the most of those 3 big contracts (and is obviously the best of the 3 between jones and nurse) and was seen as an overpay for all of them at the time. It stil may be but if he’s healthy he’s worth the money imo. Especially since it won’t taper off at the end with poor play. It ends when he’s 31.

We'll see

He just had major hip surgery before having the worse year of his career