SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Buying into competition

Créé par: AK50
Équipe: 2023-24 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 18 juill. 2023
Publié: 18 juill. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
2.
CBJ
  1. Lindholm, Elias
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
CGY
3.
NYI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (CBJ)
4.
ANA
  1. Bemström, Emil
  2. Berni, Tim [Droits de RFA]
  3. Boqvist, Adam
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (CBJ)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VAN
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
2026
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $81 643 333 $0 $4 550 000 $1 856 667 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Islanders de New York
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 150 000 $4 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 725 000 $4 725 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
825 000 $825 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
1 525 000 $1 525 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
762 500 $762 500 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
950 000 $950 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance3 200 000 $$3M)
C
RFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
975 000 $975 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 juill. 2023 à 14 h 2
#1
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,182
Mentions "j'aime": 1,883
Modifié 18 juill. 2023 à 15 h 53
Van can't afford both. But you could Peeke their interest in one (bad pun attempt).

Beauvillier for Peeke would definitely get their attention imo.
AK50 a aimé ceci.
18 juill. 2023 à 14 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,144
Mentions "j'aime": 387
sorry but where is elvis?
18 juill. 2023 à 14 h 47
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,538
Mentions "j'aime": 19,679
Buyout window ended June 30th, without an arbitration case you can't get a 2nd buyout window

Flames also don't consider that
Prison_Goalie_Rick a aimé ceci.
18 juill. 2023 à 15 h 16
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Buyout window ended June 30th, without an arbitration case you can't get a 2nd buyout window

Flames also don't consider that


I really hope the Flames just resign Lindholm, because I think their fans are going to be very disappointed in the return if they trade him.
Indy a aimé ceci.
18 juill. 2023 à 15 h 28
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,538
Mentions "j'aime": 19,679
Quoting: HockeyGuy39
I really hope the Flames just resign Lindholm, because I think their fans are going to be very disappointed in the return if they trade him.


I hope they do too, that doesn't make the above offer a good deal for the Flames. I get the value is probably not far off in that offer but the pieces are simply wrong
Roslovic has value but is of minimal interest to the Flames
Fix Wolansky is 1 year from UFA unless he plays 65 NHL games next year (which is unlikely), so not worth much
1st will absolutely have protection on it
Chinakhov is a solid prospect
Prison_Goalie_Rick a aimé ceci.
18 juill. 2023 à 15 h 33
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I hope they do too, that doesn't make the above offer a good deal for the Flames. I get the value is probably not far off in that offer but the pieces are simply wrong
Roslovic has value but is of minimal interest to the Flames
Fix Wolansky is 1 year from UFA unless he plays 65 NHL games next year (which is unlikely), so not worth much
1st will absolutely have protection on it
Chinakhov is a solid prospect


A top-10 protected 1st and a solid prospect is probably the best return you're are looking at.

Lindholm is an OK 1C on the wrong end of the age curve who is probably going to demand an 8x$8.5 contract at least. Not going to be a whole lot of suitors willing to give much to trade for him AND have to pay him that contract.
18 juill. 2023 à 15 h 49
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 38,538
Mentions "j'aime": 19,679
Quoting: HockeyGuy39
A top-10 protected 1st and a solid prospect is probably the best return you're are looking at.

Lindholm is an OK 1C on the wrong end of the age curve who is probably going to demand an 8x$8.5 contract at least. Not going to be a whole lot of suitors willing to give much to trade for him AND have to pay him that contract.


Lol try again. Lindholm would be extremely coveted league wide if made available. He has no trade protection and is on an extremely team friendly deal. His next contract is irrelevant in talks concerning his trade value, even as purely a rental he has loads of value. Bo Horvat was traded as purely a rental and he got a better return than what you are suggesting. Bo Horvat is not nearly as good as Lindholm
18 juill. 2023 à 16 h 11
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 28
Mentions "j'aime": 14
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Lol try again. Lindholm would be extremely coveted league wide if made available. He has no trade protection and is on an extremely team friendly deal. His next contract is irrelevant in talks concerning his trade value, even as purely a rental he has loads of value. Bo Horvat was traded as purely a rental and he got a better return than what you are suggesting. Bo Horvat is not nearly as good as Lindholm


I mean, nobody is going to give you a FRP plus 2 good prospects for a one year rental of Lindholm, they would absolutely be thinking about his extension.

Bo Horvat got traded for a FRP, an iffy prospect and a roster player (which was also about making the $$ work, not just adding value for VAN). He also signed an extension with the NYI like a week later, so he absolutely wasn't a rental.

The Pierre-Luc Dubois trade also set the market for Lindholm. PLD is a younger, arguably better player than Lindholm and he got the Jets a 2nd, a good prospect, a low-end prospect, and a roster player. A FRP, a good prospect, and probably a roster guy or a 3rd is a more than fair return for Lindholm.

Calgary's best chance to get more is to send him to someone desperate to continue to compete in the short term (think Boston, Pittsburgh) because maybe they would actually use him as a rental and like I said, they're desperate, or maybe they wouldn't care about the long term of his contract as much. Maybe you'd get more out of them, but they don't have as much capital to trade away in the first place.
Indy et BoomerTheHero a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage