Massive, heinous overpay

A good prospect and 2 picks, for Gibson at 4 x 5? I think it’s pretty fair.

He doesn’t have to stand on his head, just make a good tandem with Levi.

Well, @littlejerryseinfeld and I have frequent disagreements, and some of them are about John Gibson, but in this instance, we're in harmony . . . this is an overpayment even with the retention, which we probably won't give and you probably don't need.

Given our weakness at RW, I think the most likely exchange would be Gibson for the first, UPL and either Isak Rosen or Olivier Nadeau.

Ok, I wasn’t sure on picks and I added Bush for cap purposes as we really don’t need him.

Fair enough -- we'd almost certainly take him.

Gibson has been below average for 4 years. You are offering far far far too much. Remove the 1st AND ostlund

Yeah. Too much for Gibson
2nd 2024 becomes a 1st if Sabres make playoffs UPL and Nadeau

I was reading an article that said ANH gave up 39 shots a game, the most in the league.

Gibson faced 37 shots per game. Most of the top goalies in the league faced around 33 shots per game. Only Juuse Saros saw more shots in the entire season, and he played in 11 more games than Gibson; Connor Hellebuyck saw almost as many shots as Gibson, and also played in 11 more games. And I can tell you that having seen every second of the more than 3000 minutes that Gibson played this year, virtually every single goal he gave up was a hard chance. He may not be as good as we Gibson fans think, but he's nowhere near as bad as his detractors believe.

That's ridiculous, I honestly belive Gibson can be had for a 2nd round pick.