SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Big EK trade

Créé par: TMLBRIAN
Équipe: 2023-24 Sabres de Buffalo
Date de création initiale: 18 juin 2023
Publié: 18 juin 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Thoughts?
Transactions
BUF
  1. Karlsson, Erik (5 750 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
full 50% retention.
SJS
  1. Jokiharju, Henri
  2. Luukkonen, Ukko-Pekka
  3. Östlund, Noah
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BUF)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (BUF)
Détails additionnels:
13th overall + high level centre prospect + young RD and Young Goalie with potential + 2nd round pick
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BUF
Logo de PHI
Logo de LAK
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2024
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
2025
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de BUF
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2083 500 000 $65 390 237 $0 $4 570 000 $18 109 763 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
C
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
855 833 $855 833 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
7 100 000 $7 100 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance412 500 $$412K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
4 285 714 $4 285 714 $
DG
UFA - 7
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance1 850 000 $$2M)
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
4 250 000 $4 250 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 850 000 $1 850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
687 500 $687 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sabres de Buffalo
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 juin 2023 à 12 h 12
#26
Hockey Addict
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 171
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: sharcuda22
dude sharks are starting a rebuild. this is maybe the ideal or dream return for karlsson although in any trade with Buffalo I would think sharks push HARD for Savoie given we know they really wanted him in 2022


This trade has zero no doubt star power in return for SJS. "with potential" isn't a great trade chip! SJS will be looking for young stars they can build around, not players with questionable futures.
18 juin 2023 à 15 h 55
#27
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 552
Quoting: R1CH
This trade has zero no doubt star power in return for SJS. "with potential" isn't a great trade chip! SJS will be looking for young stars they can build around, not players with questionable futures.


dang bro I didn't know you were an insider. Where do you get this info from? the meier trade? Shakir is only people. Savoie is a lil monster and one the sharks rate highly and we get a high draft pick to select a player that the sharks like. this is probably close to if not the best return we could ask for
TMLBRIAN et dzmets a aimé ceci.
18 juin 2023 à 16 h 4
#28
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,532
Mentions "j'aime": 4,174
Quoting: sharcuda22
dang bro I didn't know you were an insider. Where do you get this info from? the meier trade? Shakir is only people. Savoie is a lil monster and one the sharks rate highly and we get a high draft pick to select a player that the sharks like. this is probably close to if not the best return we could ask for


Just read all his posts in this thread. It will tell you all you will need to know about him. I would save your breath. haha
sharcuda22 a aimé ceci.
18 juin 2023 à 16 h 24
#29
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 552
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Just read all his posts in this thread. It will tell you all you will need to know about him. I would save your breath. haha


sharks could get number 1 overall and he would be like why would they want that its only potential bedard hasn't proven anything
TMLBRIAN et ChestNut33 a aimé ceci.
18 juin 2023 à 17 h 8
#30
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 9,532
Mentions "j'aime": 4,174
Quoting: sharcuda22
sharks could get number 1 overall and he would be like why would they want that its only potential bedard hasn't proven anything


I almost made that comment last night and then decided that I had enough internet for the day and went to bed instead. HAHA
18 juin 2023 à 18 h 28
#31
Hockey Addict
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 171
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: sharcuda22
sharks could get number 1 overall and he would be like why would they want that its only potential bedard hasn't proven anything


Savoie isn't even in the trade proposal LOL. Tell me 1 person in this trade proposal that comes anywhere close to a #1 draft pick? You're completely speculating on all players but the 1 player who is actually considered an NHLer. The 13th overall pick has value. Ostlund still has value but no NA pro experience. Luukkonen isn't turning any heads, he's struggling(SJS would be asking for Levi). Jokiharju is a depth Dman forced to play top mins who's had a lot of injury history for a 24 year old who's underperformed. The 2024 2nd rd pick wouldn't get you 1 year of $5.75M retained let alone 4 years equaling $23M!

The Meier trade isn't comparable at all! He had 1 year remaining before a qualifying offer of $10M which was the reason he was traded. Karlsson is very likely winning the Norris, has 4 years remaining and wants to go to a CONTENDER! He has control of where he goes!
18 juin 2023 à 19 h 50
#32
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 552
Quoting: R1CH
Savoie isn't even in the trade proposal LOL. Tell me 1 person in this trade proposal that comes anywhere close to a #1 draft pick? You're completely speculating on all players but the 1 player who is actually considered an NHLer. The 13th overall pick has value. Ostlund still has value but no NA pro experience. Luukkonen isn't turning any heads, he's struggling(SJS would be asking for Levi). Jokiharju is a depth Dman forced to play top mins who's had a lot of injury history for a 24 year old who's underperformed. The 2024 2nd rd pick wouldn't get you 1 year of $5.75M retained let alone 4 years equaling $23M!

The Meier trade isn't comparable at all! He had 1 year remaining before a qualifying offer of $10M which was the reason he was traded. Karlsson is very likely winning the Norris, has 4 years remaining and wants to go to a CONTENDER! He has control of where he goes!


Karlsson controlling where he goes limits his value, as does the length of his contract, as does his injury record. The comment to which I first replied to you in said this was a good proposal but sharks would probably prefer to take Savoie if they could because I know they were high on him at the 2022 draft. Also because you could not grasp the sarcasm in the last reply I was not actually talking about a 1st overall pick. This offer is both in line with what the sharks asked for before in the meier deal, and just about the best return the sharks could hope to get in the circumstances.
18 juin 2023 à 19 h 57
#33
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,521
Mentions "j'aime": 769
1) 3 1sts + 2 2nds is a great haul for Karlsson
2) BUF has no need for Karlsson
18 juin 2023 à 20 h 7
#34
Hockey Addict
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 171
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: sharcuda22
Karlsson controlling where he goes limits his value, as does the length of his contract, as does his injury record. The comment to which I first replied to you in said this was a good proposal but sharks would probably prefer to take Savoie if they could because I know they were high on him at the 2022 draft. Also because you could not grasp the sarcasm in the last reply I was not actually talking about a 1st overall pick. This offer is both in line with what the sharks asked for before in the meier deal, and just about the best return the sharks could hope to get in the circumstances.


You can't seem to grasp what the ask for is to retain $23M... They don't pay that in Monopoly money!
18 juin 2023 à 20 h 18
#35
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 552
Quoting: R1CH
You can't seem to grasp what the ask for is to retain $23M... They don't pay that in Monopoly money!


the sharks dont need the space... we play abysmal hockey, hasso plattner is also in for whatever
18 juin 2023 à 20 h 22
#36
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,521
Mentions "j'aime": 769
Quoting: R1CH
You can't seem to grasp what the ask for is to retain $23M... They don't pay that in Monopoly money!


It's a lot of money, for sure. SJS screwed themselves by signing him for that much money for that long. $23M << $46M. We can understand that right? Spending $46mm for a player that doesn't help them get to the playoffs (no player will, the roster is old and overpaid) doesn't make much sense. SJS will need to retain at least a good portion of the contract in order to move him.

The Burns trade is a good reference point.

Burns (34% retained) + Pederson <> Lorentz + Makiniemi + 3rd

SJS got hosed. Karlsson may fetch a bit more, but most teams just cannot fit his contract at almost any dollar amount. He's just not worth that much despite winning another Norris.
TMLBRIAN a aimé ceci.
18 juin 2023 à 20 h 45
#37
Hockey Addict
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 171
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: sharcuda22
the sharks dont need the space... we play abysmal hockey, hasso plattner is also in for whatever


Someone still has to pay half his salary. That's real money, not just his cap hit that SJS can eat while they tank.

When you add up the player you're getting(Norris winning elite playmaking Dman with 4 years left + $23M in cap retention + $19.5M in actual paid salary) this proposal just isn't enough. There is no one mentioned coming from BUF that is a lock to be excited about!
18 juin 2023 à 20 h 50
#38
Hockey Addict
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 171
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: worldwidesensei
It's a lot of money, for sure. SJS screwed themselves by signing him for that much money for that long. $23M << $46M. We can understand that right? Spending $46mm for a player that doesn't help them get to the playoffs (no player will, the roster is old and overpaid) doesn't make much sense. SJS will need to retain at least a good portion of the contract in order to move him.

The Burns trade is a good reference point.

Burns (34% retained) + Pederson <> Lorentz + Makiniemi + 3rd

SJS got hosed. Karlsson may fetch a bit more, but most teams just cannot fit his contract at almost any dollar amount. He's just not worth that much despite winning another Norris.


Burns has $2.7M cap retention on a front loaded $8M deal. He was the cheapest of the 3 highly paid Dmen in SJ that they had to move, hence Burns being moved 1st.
19 juin 2023 à 8 h 3
#39
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 552
Quoting: R1CH
Someone still has to pay half his salary. That's real money, not just his cap hit that SJS can eat while they tank.

When you add up the player you're getting(Norris winning elite playmaking Dman with 4 years left + $23M in cap retention + $19.5M in actual paid salary) this proposal just isn't enough. There is no one mentioned coming from BUF that is a lock to be excited about!


but Krlsson does not have the worth. 13th overall is plenty to be excited about especially if it turns into Simashev or ASP
19 juin 2023 à 8 h 39
#40
Hockey Addict
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2023
Messages: 171
Mentions "j'aime": 18
Quoting: sharcuda22
but Krlsson does not have the worth. 13th overall is plenty to be excited about especially if it turns into Simashev or ASP


There's a lot of ifs in this thread that no team is going to pay $19.5M cash + lose their best offensive player + retain $23M in cap to just guess on. This is simply a bad trade proposal. Karlsson would veto this trade in a heartbeat too. He wants to contend, not be in trade rumors again next summer.
19 juin 2023 à 8 h 49
#41
sharcuda22
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2022
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 552
Quoting: R1CH
There's a lot of ifs in this thread that no team is going to pay $19.5M cash + lose their best offensive player + retain $23M in cap to just guess on. This is simply a bad trade proposal. Karlsson would veto this trade in a heartbeat too. He wants to contend, not be in trade rumors again next summer.


buffalo will probably be a playoff team next year, and each year the rest of Karlsson's contract. also simashev and ASP both have 1 d potential. Youre too high on the market for EK and looking at it without considering other teams constraints... most teams in on Karlsson are up against the cap, and I dont think buffalo is one because he doesn't match what they need stylistically. So a deal where the sharks take on little to no cap coming back, get another goalie who might be good but is inexpensive is fine, the 13th overall pick which you are picking a top defensive prospect with (sharks need real bad), and another excellent center prospect although I would prefer to get Savoie back in this trade. It doesn't make any sense for the sharks to want bonafide NHL'ers because all that would be available in a trade for EK do not match our current timeline

*Edit* AND this also sets us up to chase another top 5 prospect in next years draft which would put us near the high end of NHL prospect pools depending on who graduates this year. Smith Eklund 13 pick 2023 and Top 5 2024 pick. you gotta look past this year in the trade
19 juin 2023 à 14 h 50
#42
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,521
Mentions "j'aime": 769
Quoting: R1CH
Someone still has to pay half his salary. That's real money, not just his cap hit that SJS can eat while they tank.

When you add up the player you're getting(Norris winning elite playmaking Dman with 4 years left + $23M in cap retention + $19.5M in actual paid salary) this proposal just isn't enough. There is no one mentioned coming from BUF that is a lock to be excited about!


Do you think Karlsson is getting better? No one else does. He's getting old. That's the part you seem to be missing.
19 juin 2023 à 14 h 51
#43
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,521
Mentions "j'aime": 769
Quoting: worldwidesensei
Do you think Karlsson is getting better? No one else does. He's getting old. That's the part you seem to be missing.


3 1sts and 2 2nds? That's not enough? I mean, wow.
19 juin 2023 à 14 h 53
#44
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 1,521
Mentions "j'aime": 769
Quoting: R1CH
There's a lot of ifs in this thread that no team is going to pay $19.5M cash + lose their best offensive player + retain $23M in cap to just guess on. This is simply a bad trade proposal. Karlsson would veto this trade in a heartbeat too. He wants to contend, not be in trade rumors again next summer.


Burns got you a 3rd round pick....
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage