Easy no from Winnipeg. One of Raymond or Kasper would be going to Winnipeg in addition to Detroit's 23 1st as a minimum.

AZ, Vancouver and Winnipeg all decline. All 3 deals heavily favor the Wings

Canucks decline if we are gonna pair our first for a cap dump it would be for OEL, Myers after his signing bonus is only owed 1 million with a caphit of 6 million so a team like Arizona, Chicago, or even Anaheim would want him for a very cheap price.

Vancouver deal i took from a Canucks post. But for arguments sake, add a future 2nd to Vancouver for a 4th.

Add the Van 1st to Connor and the Bos 1st to Keller. WPG and ARZ both add a 2nd or something. Deals?

Add the Vancouver 1st for a Jets 2nd. Deal?

That Vancouver 1st is #11. They aren't using that to dump one year of Myers. Wings are adding the Isles 1st at a minimum.

Keller probably takes at least three 1st's of value for AZ to even consider it. Fabbri and Sebrango don't add any value in the deal.

Not sure what Winnipeg would want for Connor. Just know your original offer isn't close.

Nope. One of Kasper or Raymond will do.

Cross Hanas, ACGM Legend.

Yeah, I’d do all of these. They’re all very fair. Don’t listen to any of these people that say otherwise. Everybody thinks their teams players are Connor McDavid.

No way are the Canucks dropping 32 spots to dump 1 year of Myers. Absolutely 0 incentive to do that. Tell me, why would Vancouver be so desparate to gain 1 year of cap space when they have no important players to sign this season?

Makes no sense for Vancouver. Freeing 1 year of cap space by dumping Myers does not really help us at all. Especially when our prospect pool is so bad

Yeah, the Canucks trade was the only questionable one but, Vancouver has certainly made worse moves than that.

With our current GM? Like what?

Idk about the current GM but in recent years

Why does it matter what the previous GM did? Has literally no impact on what the current GM does. What kind of logic is that? It isn't like the city of Vancouver makes bad trades.

I honestly don’t keep tabs on the Canucks like that to know when exactly they changed GM’s but the last couple made terrible moves. That has no bearing on what the new GM will do, unless the ownership was involved in previous decisions and are in future ones

Current management team has made pretty good moves so I don't know what you are talking about. Jim Benning is no longer the GM. Only he would do something stupid and narrowsighted like this

Well, coming from someone who has watched every single game Filip Hronek has played - he overpaid to acquire him. Good player tho. Not worth what he gave up tho.

Not sure where else there is a true U25 top 4 RHD on the market. Paid the price it took. Was a good trade overall. Essentially turned an expiring UFA in Horvat into Hronek, Beauvillier, and Raty. Hronek will likely have a bigger impact on the Canucks than Horvat. Overall a good move in a retool perspective. Hronek had an amazing year as well. The Canucks have a legit top 4 defenseman outside of Quinn Hughes

Hey I’m just giving u some perspective on the player. I was shocked at what we got for him.

Knowing what I know about him - The most I’d pay for Hronek is a 2nd and maybe a 4th. So, to get what we got, my opinion is that it was an overpayment.

Well Hronek was one of the best defensemen in the league this year. His underlying numbers were fantastic so I am not super surprised he took that much to acquire. 25 year old top pairing defensemen are pretty rare on the trade market. Cost a lot, but it makes sense why it cost so much

So you’re telling me 2 1sts, 2 2nds, and 2 B/B+ prospects isn’t a fair offer? That’s ridiculous.

I like Hanas. See him as a Fabbri type middle 6 forward(hopefully without the injuries).

Idk, saw a Canucks fan post it with Myers and a 1st for a 2nd, so I took it and added a prospect going back to Vancouver.

Giving a 1st and a 2nd for Hronek? I like Hronek and was shocked we traded him. Then I saw what we got for him him and was like “yeah I’ll take that.”