Looks like I will make threads like this again since your trolling means even less.

Looks like somebody shouldn't have hit the post button if he didn't want people commenting on the values of the trades proposed.

Didn't troll you at all, your proposals stink

This part: "Please read this description before commenting."

heavily implies that:
"None of these 10 trades have to be made."
"None of these 10 teams have to trade for DeBrincat."
... are to be used as pointers through which the users' comments pertaining to this AGM should be considered.
What your description fails to do is to inform anyone commenting on your AGM how the shape of discussion should differ from any other AGM posted on the forum.

Stop gaslighting us and try to clarify what you actually meant by:
"None of these 10 trades have to be made."
"None of these 10 teams have to trade for DeBrincat."

Looks like someone made a poor ACGM and doesn't like the fact that he was rebuffed (description was read, but that trade would not allow Ottawa to save face because the Pens wouldn't agree to it).

I invite such comments.

The issue is some people like yourself are unable to read a 3 sentence description before commenting.

It is what it is.

Why do you keep acting like those sentences mean something? You proposed trade values from multiple teams for debrincat and fans made comments on those values. That's the point of posting on this site.

That's exactly what a troll would say.

But the description is not telling anybody to comment any differently.

Or that this AGM should be treated any differently from others.

No of course, you're right.

Everyone commenting on here clearly and very needlessly misunderstood this fine example of AGM.

Wishing you a wonderful Friday.

Looks like I made a good ACGM with at least two possible trade scenarios for DeBrincat and that my ACGM was not entirely rebuffed.

You only read the description when I had to point it out to you in the thread.

Because they do mean something.

And like I said, I invite such comments.

Same to you

I can definitely see 24 1st and Lapierre plus a second or something for Cat. I don't see the caps giving up 8OA unless for Keller

Change your name to sensonice

Yeah Wings ain't do that.

I actually kind of like that name.

Please read the description again and thanks for stopping by.

Ok? Why make a proposal at all if you don't want to know whether it's a realistic offer or not? Keep it in your drafts if you don't want criticism.

Also Buffalo wouldn't even give Levi for DeBrincat straight up considering their position.

Looking at it, the only team (assuming a competent GM) that would probably accept any of these proposals would be NYI.

1. I did want to know and at least a couple of these 10 trades are realistic offers, given some of the comments.



2. I didn't feel like keeping it in the drafts.



3. In that case, Buffalo would overrate Levi.

1. I've seen two comments saying they take this (NYI+WSH), with one of them contested (WSH).

2. Then quit complaining about criticism.

3. Buffalo needs a goalie much more than a LW.

Then we'll take the trade with NYI.

All we really need is 1 trade with 1 other team for DeBrincat.

None of the others matter.

Ok? So the criticism of others allows you to narrow down what teams takes the offer lol. If you only want to trade with NYI, then create proposal for them and them only. But you didn't, you created one with other teams, and those fans of the other teams gave you their input.