SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

24-25

Créé par: jwg314
Équipe: 2024-25 Blue Jackets de Columbus
Date de création initiale: 16 mai 2023
Publié: 17 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
32 000 000 $
3925 000 $
87 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
33 000 000 $
24 500 000 $
3925 000 $
32 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 000 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Carlsson, Leo
2925 000 $
Depth, Forward
1900 000 $
Depth, Forward
1900 000 $
Depth, Defense
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Bemström, Emil [Droits de RFA]
  2. Peeke, Andrew
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
2.
CBJ
  1. Swayman, Jeremy [Droits de RFA]
BOS
  1. Fix-Wolansky, Trey
  2. Tarasov, Daniil
  3. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CBJ)
  4. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (CBJ)
Détails additionnels:
Roslovic 50%
3.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
CGY
  1. Bean, Jake [Droits de RFA]
Détails additionnels:
'24 OS
4.
CBJ
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2025 (EDM)
EDM
  1. Boqvist, Adam
Détails additionnels:
'25 TDL to a team strapped for cap
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CBJ
Logo de LAK
Logo de CGY
Logo de CBJ
Logo de WPG
Logo de BOS
Logo de CBJ
2024
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CGY
Logo de LAK
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
2025
Logo de CBJ
Logo de EDM
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VGK
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2385 500 000 $83 193 333 $0 $1 082 500 $2 306 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 750 000 $9 750 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 5
Carlsson, Leo
925 000 $925 000 $
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
8 700 000 $8 700 000 $
C, AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, C
RFA
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
9 583 333 $9 583 333 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
RFA
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance1 000 000 $$1M)
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
5 400 000 $5 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
825 000 $825 000 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Depth, Forward
900 000 $900 000 $
Depth, Defense
900 000 $900 000 $
Depth, Forward
900 000 $900 000 $

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 mai 2023 à 0 h 41
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,833
Mentions "j'aime": 8,855
Pass . Easily. No interest in any of that.
17 mai 2023 à 0 h 45
#2
Démarrer sujet
STL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,622
Mentions "j'aime": 1,639
Quoting: Gofnut999
Pass . Easily. No interest in any of that.


Curious what you suggest otherwise with your cap situation including $4.5M bonus penalty? Do you think you can keep both Swayman and Ullmark? Roslovic at $2M cap can help you now then the other assets are decent enough for a goalie acquisition.
17 mai 2023 à 0 h 54
#3
Démarrer sujet
STL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,622
Mentions "j'aime": 1,639
Quoting: Gofnut999
Pass . Easily. No interest in any of that.


What if someone sends a $4.2M offer sheet to Swayman and you only get a 2nd if you don't match? Do you trade Ullmark then? Won't get as much considering the other side knows the offer sheet situation.
17 mai 2023 à 1 h 44
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,833
Mentions "j'aime": 8,855
Quoting: jwg314
What if someone sends a $4.2M offer sheet to Swayman and you only get a 2nd if you don't match? Do you trade Ullmark then? Won't get as much considering the other side knows the offer sheet situation.


Easy. They match. Unless they are getting a 1st and 3rd, they match.

Not worried about an OS at all honestly.
jwg314 a aimé ceci.
17 mai 2023 à 1 h 52
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,833
Mentions "j'aime": 8,855
Modifié 17 mai 2023 à 2 h 6
Quoting: jwg314
Curious what you suggest otherwise with your cap situation including $4.5M bonus penalty? Do you think you can keep both Swayman and Ullmark? Roslovic at $2M cap can help you now then the other assets are decent enough for a goalie acquisition.


Roslovic is a headache. The rest is a pile of meh.

I have no desire to keep both but it’s certainly possible if Sway takes a 1 year bridge at 2.5. It’s completely up to Sway, if he wants to get paid now, one has to go, but he does not have a lot of leverage other than OS which are rarely used and there is really only 1 team that has the resources to do it in a way that Boston can’t match that would make any sense for them to do it…Carolina.

They should trade Ullmark and keep Swayman, which was always the game plan when they signed Ullmark. They gave Ullmark a full NMC until Sways contract ran out. Then reduced it to M-NTC to open up the possibility of a trade when Sway needed a new deal.

Boston has zero desire to move Sway. If you want him you would have to match or beat the 1st/3rd compensation they woukd receive from an OS they could/would not match.
jwg314 a aimé ceci.
17 mai 2023 à 2 h 6
#6
Démarrer sujet
STL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,622
Mentions "j'aime": 1,639
Quoting: Gofnut999
Roslovic is a headache. The rest is a pile of meh.

I have no desire to keep both but it’s certainly possible if Sway takes a 1 year bridge at 2.5. It’s completely up to Sway, if he wants to get paid now, one has to go, but he does not have a lot of leverage other than OS which are rarely used and there is really only 1 team that has the resources to do it in a way that Boston can’t match that would make any sense for them to do it…Carolina.

They should trade Ullmark and keep Swayman, which was always the game plan when they signed Ullmark. They gave Ullmark a full NMC until Sways contract ran out. Then reduced it to M-NTC to open up the possibility of a trade when Sway needed a new deal.


So you like the idea of keeping Sway over Ullmark if it came to that? Would you do a similar deal as this if it were Ullmark instead?
17 mai 2023 à 2 h 9
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 19,833
Mentions "j'aime": 8,855
Quoting: jwg314
So you like the idea of keeping Sway over Ullmark if it came to that? Would you do a similar deal as this if it were Ullmark instead?


I’d keep Sway over Ully. Simply because of age.

I’d want 1st/3rd type of value by way of picks or prospects. No $ coming back.
17 mai 2023 à 3 h 33
#8
Dr_Invictus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,278
Mentions "j'aime": 878
Bean doesn't justify that
17 mai 2023 à 3 h 41
#9
Démarrer sujet
STL
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 3,622
Mentions "j'aime": 1,639
Quoting: Dr_Invictus
Bean doesn't justify that


This is with another full year of development for him. a 2nd is $2.1M+. That's fair, especially if Hanifin walks.
17 mai 2023 à 6 h 35
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Peeke just signed to a new deal, don't see them moving him for Murph.
Garak et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
17 mai 2023 à 7 h 13
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,872
Mentions "j'aime": 10,668
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
Peeke just signed to a new deal, don't see them moving him for Murph.


They didn't give him any clause, though. So, that doesn't mean a whole lot and probably just adds to his trade value, if anything. CBJ has a plethora of RD at the NHL level, none of which are solidified in their lineup, including Peeke. They could trade every single one of them and I wouldn't blame them. Although, I do think, of all their RD, Peeke is probably the one CBJ likes the most.

Either way, CHI likely accepts this if CBJ offers it. They could probably even take out Bemstrom and I'd still be on board with it.
Aussie_Blackhawk et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
17 mai 2023 à 7 h 18
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 4,986
Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
Quoting: Garak
They didn't give him any clause, though. So, that doesn't mean a whole lot and probably just adds to his trade value, if anything. CBJ has a plethora of RD at the NHL level, none of which are solidified in their lineup, including Peeke. They could trade every single one of them and I wouldn't blame them. Although, I do think, of all their RD, Peeke is probably the one CBJ likes the most.

Either way, CHI likely accepts this if CBJ offers it. They could probably even take out Bemstrom and I'd still be on board with it.


Yeah certainly seemed like CBJ liked Peeke. I would probably opt to keep Bemstrom in there if CBJ were actively pursuing Murph.
Garak a aimé ceci.
17 mai 2023 à 7 h 20
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 10,872
Mentions "j'aime": 10,668
Modifié 17 mai 2023 à 9 h 36
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
Yeah certainly seemed like CBJ liked Peeke. I would probably opt to keep Bemstrom in there if CBJ were actively pursuing Murph.


Sure. I'm just saying value-wise, they could probably exclude Bem and the value would still be there, or close enough. That early 2nd round is going to be full of overflow from the 1st round, so CBJ's 2nd is a great pick.
Aussie_Blackhawk et Hawksguy81 a aimé ceci.
17 mai 2023 à 10 h 29
#14
Dr_Invictus
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 2,278
Mentions "j'aime": 878
I get that Defensemen take longer to develop, but bean hasn't seemed to progress. Could be just Columbus
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage