SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

The Only Deal Worth Making

Créé par: MG1986
Équipe: 2023-24 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 13 mai 2023
Publié: 13 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Hahahaha! Who says no? :P
Transactions
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de NYI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de CHI
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1583 500 000 $68 741 533 $0 $0 $14 758 467 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
12 600 000 $12 600 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
AD, C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
925 000 $925 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
9 000 000 $9 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
766 667 $766 667 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
762 500 $762 500 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 mai 2023 à 10 h 25
#1
HuGo is a Boss GM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 6,958
Mentions "j'aime": 3,038
LOL.
13 mai 2023 à 10 h 26
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,199
Mentions "j'aime": 4,658
This is epic bad for both clubs.
13 mai 2023 à 10 h 33
#3
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 9,729
Mentions "j'aime": 2,948
This is a lose-lose trade... As much as I love Mack, Makar and Rantanen
13 mai 2023 à 10 h 34
#4
Démarrer sujet
#LeafsFever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 3,785
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
This is epic bad for both clubs.


The truth is is that if it was 2 for 2, Matthews/Marner for MacKinnon/Rantanen and all players had similar term left on deals, it wouldn't be such a far-fetched idea. The inclusion of Makar definitely makes this especially silly though grin
kitkat_2001 a aimé ceci.
13 mai 2023 à 10 h 49
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2020
Messages: 11,199
Mentions "j'aime": 4,658
Quoting: MG1986
The truth is is that if it was 2 for 2, Matthews/Marner for MacKinnon/Rantanen and all players had similar term left on deals, it wouldn't be such a far-fetched idea. The inclusion of Makar definitely makes this especially silly though grin


Even 2 for 2 moving superstars for superstars is always a dicey area both teams alienate their fan bases while not really improving or gaining assets.
13 mai 2023 à 10 h 53
#6
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,271
Mentions "j'aime": 11,347
Quoting: Rob32sjsharks
This is epic bad for both clubs.


Quoting: Leafsfan98
This is a lose-lose trade... As much as I love Mack, Makar and Rantanen


Ehh how is this bad for Toronto exactly?
TJTwolf et kitkat_2001 a aimé ceci.
13 mai 2023 à 22 h 54
#7
Leafs going to Leafs
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2022
Messages: 9,729
Mentions "j'aime": 2,948
Quoting: mokumboi
Ehh how is this bad for Toronto exactly?


Toronto is losing out on the best player IMO. Also, while Rielly isn't better than Cale, he's a leader and produces in the most needed moments. Niemela is also our top D prospect and that 2024 first is still a 1st
13 mai 2023 à 23 h 21
#8
mokumboi
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 29,271
Mentions "j'aime": 11,347
Modifié 14 mai 2023 à 3 h 52
Quoting: Leafsfan98
Toronto is losing out on the best player IMO. Also, while Rielly isn't better than Cale, he's a leader and produces in the most needed moments. Niemela is also our top D prospect and that 2024 first is still a 1st


Heh. The Leafs take this and run, dude. Calling Neimela your top defensive prospect is like saying the McDouble is the best burger at McDonald's. I mean yeeeeah okaaaay, but that's not saying much. Not much at all. Is he even still a top 100 prospect? Maybe he's barely hanging on, but the draft will instantly shove him far from the top 100. A late 24 1st is just a regular late 1st, it does not cover the wide gulf in these packages. Rielly is a leader and a big moments producer on a team that has won one playoff round. Makar won the Conn Smythe at 23. Matthews/McKinnon and Marner/Rantanen are, at best, washes for you, but Makar is waaaaaaaaaaaaaay more valuable than Rielly. Meanwhile, Makar is locked up for four seasons and McKinnon is locked up for eight while Matthews and Marner go UFA in one and two seasons, respectively. Robertson is worth practically nothing. That's alllllll before we even get to what the fan reaction would be if the Avs did this. Most of those folks are not at all stable, dude.

Don;t get me wrong, I would LOVE for Colorado to do this, because it would be spectacularly dumb. Like wet sack of hammers dumb. Sakic is not that dumb.
kitkat_2001 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage