SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fantilli plus

Créé par: Jah1722
Équipe: 2023-24 Ducks d'Anaheim
Date de création initiale: 9 mai 2023
Publié: 9 mai 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
The ducks have some decisions to make. They could play a lot of the kids with the big club next season. Fantilli straight to the NHL and then Minty, Zellweger, LaCombe and even Hinds could all get some decent NHL time too.

Or they could play all the kids in SD make a significant push for a Calder cup. That would mean a bit of a tank at the NHL level tho.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
87 500 000 $
77 500 000 $
22 500 000 $
12 000 000 $
12 500 000 $
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
55 500 000 $
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Fantilli, Adam
3950 000 $
Transactions
1.
ANA
  1. Sharangovich, Yegor [Droits de RFA]
NJD
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (SJS)
2.
ANA
  1. Walker, Sean
Détails additionnels:
Something like this. Jones for a 3RD from a team with a guy who might be have a little too much of a cap hit.
3.
ANA
  1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
COL
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Not necessarily COL but feel like ANA moves back into the 1st round somewhere.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de ANA
Logo de COL
Logo de BOS
Logo de COL
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2024
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de BOS
Logo de ANA
Logo de PIT
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
2025
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de MIN
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2483 500 000 $71 356 250 $0 $3 975 000 $12 143 750 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 456 250 $1 456 250 $
AG, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
AD
UFA - 7
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Fantilli, Adam
950 000 $950 000 $
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
3 650 000 $3 650 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 8
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
918 333 $918 333 $ (Bonis de performance550 000 $$550K)
DG
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
850 000 $850 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
425 000 $425 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
775 000 $775 000 $
AD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 mai 2023 à 17 h 21
#1
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,462
Mentions "j'aime": 25,358
Oddly enough, it takes either of our late seconds to get the corresponding first from the "parent" team:

Boston 1st (#28, owned by Toronto) = Boston 2nd (#60) plus our second (#33)
Colorado 1st (#27) = Colorado second (#59) plus our second (#33)

If Carolina loses to New Jersey, the Colorado picks become #26 and #58 and our second doesn't quite do it.

Is it worth it for us to give up a late second to move up 5 or 6 places? Only if we have someone specific in mind there.

I'd much rather move up in the second round: the Boston and Colorado seconds could get us one of Detroit's three successive seconds at the beginning of the round (probably #43).

I'm pretty happy with everything else here.
GiggywithGibby a aimé ceci.
9 mai 2023 à 17 h 32
#2
Future Ducks legend
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 9,959
Mentions "j'aime": 6,755
I think sending all the kids to SD for a year and a shot at the Calder is good, build some comraderie, resign Stolarz for a year so Dostal can go back too, it'll be the only hardware they are hoisting for a while. Maybe this will spark some drive in a couple of the guys that seem stalled out down there (Tracey, Perrault, etc)

Problem in Anaheim is that our forward core is a bit ahead of our defensive core, so we really need to make sure they meet or beat development expectations over the next two seasons. As for the guys already on the big team, just going to have to tread water for a bit, work on their own things, Zegras needs to stay out of the damned box, all the young centers need to work on faceoffs, the team as a whole needs to be better defensively.
9 mai 2023 à 17 h 51
#3
Démarrer sujet
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,898
Quoting: GiggywithGibby
I think sending all the kids to SD for a year and a shot at the Calder is good, build some comraderie, resign Stolarz for a year so Dostal can go back too, it'll be the only hardware they are hoisting for a while. Maybe this will spark some drive in a couple of the guys that seem stalled out down there (Tracey, Perrault, etc)

Problem in Anaheim is that our forward core is a bit ahead of our defensive core, so we really need to make sure they meet or beat development expectations over the next two seasons. As for the guys already on the big team, just going to have to tread water for a bit, work on their own things, Zegras needs to stay out of the damned box, all the young centers need to work on faceoffs, the team as a whole needs to be better defensively.


Winning will fix some of Zegras’ faults. I mean I could be wrong but I doubt he’s ever been on a bad team. Frustration and immaturity is all that is. He’ll grow from that.

Face offs are a bit overrated. Don’t have to be dominant on the dot. Sure it’s not a bad thing to be good at but not the end all be all.

The coach will fix some of the serious defensive issues. Eakins system was just awful.

But overall yea the Dcore needs to catch up to the forward group. Outside of Zellweger Minty and maybe Luneau I wouldn’t be opposed to trading them now if the right guy is available
9 mai 2023 à 17 h 53
#4
Démarrer sujet
Jah1722
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 5,418
Mentions "j'aime": 2,898
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Oddly enough, it takes either of our late seconds to get the corresponding first from the "parent" team:

Boston 1st (#28, owned by Toronto) = Boston 2nd (#60) plus our second (#33)
Colorado 1st (#27) = Colorado second (#59) plus our second (#33)

If Carolina loses to New Jersey, the Colorado picks become #26 and #58 and our second doesn't quite do it.

Is it worth it for us to give up a late second to move up 5 or 6 places? Only if we have someone specific in mind there.

I'd much rather move up in the second round: the Boston and Colorado seconds could get us one of Detroit's three successive seconds at the beginning of the round (probably #43).

I'm pretty happy with everything else here.


I figured but I didn’t know the exact draft value chart. Either way I don’t think they make all 4 picks in the first 2 rounds.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
9 mai 2023 à 17 h 57
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 9,602
Mentions "j'aime": 4,583
It won't likely be the Avs. They won't give up that pick easily.
9 mai 2023 à 18 h 31
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,032
Mentions "j'aime": 735
Quoting: Jah1722

Face offs are a bit overrated. Don’t have to be dominant on the dot. Sure it’s not a bad thing to be good at but not the end all be all.


While I most definitely agree with face offs being overrated the exception to that is when on special teams. On the PP and PK a team has to be able to win draws to be effective and the Ducks were dismal in both areas last season.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage