Anaheim declines

So we're getting an even older, even worse defense in exchange for the terrible JT Miller contract AND one of our few decent prospects. And then giving up a 1st for a goalie who hasn't even been average in 4 years. And signing Jeannot and Hathaway to decently costly deals with term as if we've learned nothing from Brock McGinn.

I want to hear the thought process behind this ACGM, because the only trade I like is the Carter one, and that's definitely not something Philly is agreeing to.

Anaheim declines.

Obviously, we have a difference of opinion about what four years of a starting goalie is worth. And if he's not going to be your starting goalie, why would you spend a first-round draft pick for him?

Close, Just add a 1st and a good young centre, if you dont have that then another 1st

Preds definitely accept

Minnesota declines.

Rust: 19+26 in 76
Hartman: 14+20 in 55

Hartman better ppg avg


Contract
Rust:
30 years old
5.125 mil x 5

Hartman:
28 years old
1.7 mil x 1

Hartman on a better contract, and at 30 years old Rust is nearly a cap dump which would mean you have to give up assets.

So Wild arguably give up the better player, who's younger, on a better contract, and gives up a 2nd as well?