SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Your thoughts

Créé par: Balance_is_key
Équipe: 2023-24 Panthers de la Floride
Date de création initiale: 31 mars 2023
Publié: 31 mars 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
1950 000 $
1950 000 $
11 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 500 000 $
26 300 000 $
Transactions
1.
FLA
  1. Rashevsky, Dmitri [Liste de réserve]
  2. Stanley, Logan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Zhilkin, Danil
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
  5. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
2.
LAK
  1. Jansson, Ludvig [Liste de réserve]
  2. Noel, Serron [Droits de RFA]
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de WPG
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de NYR
Logo de FLA
Logo de ARI
2024
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de PHI
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
2025
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de CGY
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
Logo de FLA
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2283 500 000 $82 660 001 $212 500 $932 500 $839 999 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
950 000 $950 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
4 425 000 $4 425 000 $
C
UFA - 2
6 300 000 $6 300 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
847 500 $847 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
2 666 667 $2 666 667 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
10 000 000 $10 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 3
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
G
RFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
925 000 $925 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 mars 2023 à 23 h 31
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 4,048
Mentions "j'aime": 1,450
Jets shouldn't be giving up their first or rashevsky. Those assets could be better used for an asset that is young or picks to help recoup picks we've spent
31 mars 2023 à 23 h 59
#2
jimmyjets
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 317
The problem with Reinhart for us is he only has one year of team control left and the direction the team takes in the offseason is unknown yet. From a cap perspective we may not be able to make it work unless we move people out and if we move out Scheif and/or PLD then it only makes sense if he would be open to extending here.

I was thinking like a 50% retained Wheeler + Stanley for Knight and Mackie S. knight hasn’t been good at the NHL level, is currently in the substance abuse program and has a $4.5M hit for the next 3 years while Bob is still under contract. Sort of depends on how much of a dump you think Knight is.

As for the OP. The 1st, Stanley and either Rash or Danny to follow the typical pick, roster player, prospect return. The 5th round pick…. You know you’re reaching there as it won’t move the needle.
1 avr. 2023 à 0 h 19
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,890
Mentions "j'aime": 7,064
Reinhart would be nice, but he's not worth that much.
1 avr. 2023 à 6 h 25
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,092
Mentions "j'aime": 714
Quoting: jimmyjets
The problem with Reinhart for us is he only has one year of team control left and the direction the team takes in the offseason is unknown yet. From a cap perspective we may not be able to make it work unless we move people out and if we move out Scheif and/or PLD then it only makes sense if he would be open to extending here.

I was thinking like a 50% retained Wheeler + Stanley for Knight and Mackie S. knight hasn’t been good at the NHL level, is currently in the substance abuse program and has a $4.5M hit for the next 3 years while Bob is still under contract. Sort of depends on how much of a dump you think Knight is.

As for the OP. The 1st, Stanley and either Rash or Danny to follow the typical pick, roster player, prospect return. The 5th round pick…. You know you’re reaching there as it won’t move the needle.


Not a single chance in the world do you get knight and samo for wheeler and Stanley. That’s a horrible trade for Florida.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
1 avr. 2023 à 11 h 9
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,496
Mentions "j'aime": 25,387
Serron Noel looks very much like a bust, and Ludvig Jansson is a RhD and thus of little help or interest to us, so Los Angeles declines.
2 avr. 2023 à 0 h 2
#6
jimmyjets
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 932
Mentions "j'aime": 317
Quoting: Hockey91
Not a single chance in the world do you get knight and samo for wheeler and Stanley. That’s a horrible trade for Florida.


So you think Knight is good and isn’t a big cap dump. All good. I haven’t really seen him play at all. I just saw save percentages of .908 and .901 with a $4.5m caphit and a guy in the substance abuse program and thought he was maybe an expensive reclamation project. If he’s not a cap dump that’s my bad. Just thought that $14.5M in goalies isn’t an optimal way to build a team especially when one of them is playing at replacement level.
2 avr. 2023 à 6 h 18
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 2,092
Mentions "j'aime": 714
Quoting: jimmyjets
So you think Knight is good and isn’t a big cap dump. All good. I haven’t really seen him play at all. I just saw save percentages of .908 and .901 with a $4.5m caphit and a guy in the substance abuse program and thought he was maybe an expensive reclamation project. If he’s not a cap dump that’s my bad. Just thought that $14.5M in goalies isn’t an optimal way to build a team especially when one of them is playing at replacement level.

He’s 21 years old on a bad defensive team. He’s absolutely not a cap dump. And it wasn’t substance abuse program it was eap problem so that’s different. They ain’t trading him for crap. They will hold onto him and wait for him to grow. He’s young and still has all the potential. Plus he has one of the highest dangerous shot save percentage in the league before he went out.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage