Kane has a clutch factor and playoff pedigree, he's come up big in a lot of big moments. So, for that reason, they could use him. Of course, the cost has to match the risk of him going out. Meier fits the bill in terms of player prototypes, but the cost could be super high. So something to consider is that they can still add size in different ways like getting Barbashev or signing Knies, and they get the impact from Kane. Now say if Kane does go down with injury, the Leafs have 4 impact forwards already. So, it's really about getting the best value for their assets. If the Kane ask is higher than Giroux's cost it's definitely not worth it, should be slightly lower though.
Fact is Meier could be too pricey, so they need to compare and contrast that. It's not as simple as saying Meier is a better fit, therefore we should get him over Kane.
McCabe-Lafferty-Raddysh would be a good pickup and only one team. Chychrun- Crouse - McBain would be another. Now the leafs would have to give up a fair bit for sure
Quoting: Babatunde
I would personally go after Sam Lafferty than Patrick Kane (and that says something). I would even rather stand pat than to acquire Kane, he isn't what we need
What about McCabe-Lafferty-Raddysh or Chychrun-Crouse-McBain. Either trade would give the leafs some physical push in a long series.
Dubas is likely to do something like that whether it be Lafferty or McCabe or someone else.