SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

What a Kane Trade Might Look Like

Créé par: blackhawksfan22
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 31 janv. 2023
Publié: 31 janv. 2023
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Thought exercise, likely off on a couple of the values. I don't see a clear destination for him yet. I like the Dallas fit the most, but their lack of a 2023 1st makes them take a different asset approach to the deal.
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Lauko, Jakub
  2. Smith, Craig
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2025 (BOS)
Détails additionnels:
They don't really need anything, but also have no reason not to go all-in. Doesn't hurt to upgrade the best team in the league. Kane could play on the 1st over DeBrusk or on the 3rd line as a scoring punch who helps the 2nd PP. Too damn good.
BOS
  1. Kane, Patrick (5 250 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Lauko gives an option for a player who can get more time in the NHL on the hawks next season
2.
CHI
  1. Buyalsky, Andrei [Liste de réserve]
  2. Foudy, Jean-Luc
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
Détails additionnels:
*Top 10 Protected 1st
Landeskog on LTIR until Playoffs in this scenario. Not sure they'd go this route vs a 2C, but maybe they think Kane could help one of their centers work with another elite winger on the other side?
COL
    Kane @ 50%

    Not many picks to deal so a B-/C+ prospect in Foudy, a hail mary of a prospect and the 1st (with protection just in case) works.
    3.
    CHI
    1. Bourque, Mavrik
    2. Gurianov, Denis
    3. Khudobin, Anton
    4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
    Détails additionnels:
    Kane would slide into their 2RW Role well
    Marchment - Seguin - Kane
    Or this just gives an additional piece to help other pieces move along the top 6.
    Bourque isn't a huge loss with Wyatt Johnson, Dellandrea in the NHL ahead of him and Stankoven on his way. He is the equivalent piece here of a lateish 1st.
    Gurianov has fallen off, playing on the 4th line, and his contract moving helps facilitate this deal. Likely wouldn't be resigned.
    Khudobin was a king in the bubble, but here is a cap dump to get the money to work.
    They may need to add a 4th line grinder after this deal, but don't lose another 1st.
    DAL
      Kane @ 50%

      Bourque helps the forward prospect group look a lot better and could get a solid look in the NHL next season.
      Gurianov may be too good for the tank, not that he is actually good, but if he rekindles his old game that's no good for us this year. A Piece that gives an NHL body to the team, and may get extended but likely not.
      Khudobin rides the bench in Rockford or the NHL depending on injuries but helps ensure Soderbloom stays in the AHL like he should have been all season
      4.
      CHI
      1. Berezkin, Maksim [Liste de réserve]
      2. Foegele, Warren
      3. Lavoie, Raphael
      4. Puljujärvi, Jesse
      5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
      6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
      Détails additionnels:
      Oilers add Kane to a lethal top 6 currently moving Derek Ryan down the lineup, and leaning into their offensive strength. Allows the top 6 to be jumbled as they wish.
      Puljujarvi gets a change of scenery, has played poorly this year and moving his cap hit helps this deal.
      Warren Foegele isn't a bad player but is not worth what he is being paid, and getting his deal off the books for next year while adding Lafferty in his place at $1.6 MM less is an upgrade on the ice and on the cap sheet.
      Berezkin is a throw-in, shot-in-the-dark prospect to make the deal happen.
      EDM
      1. Lafferty, Sam
      Détails additionnels:
      Kane @ 50%

      Lavoie is an ok prospect, with high upside but bad Skating which is not what the team is prioritizing, but there isn't a player like him in the system right now.
      Puljujarvi gets a change of scenery.
      Foegele helps the cap floor next season and takes a bottom 6 role.
      Berezkin is a throw-in, shot-in-the-dark prospect to make the deal happen.

      Losing Lafferty isn't great, but he helps maximize the return.
      5.
      CHI
      1. Kravtsov, Vitali
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (DAL)
      3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2025 (DAL)
      Détails additionnels:
      Kravtsov hasn't panned out.

      Having 2 1st rounders help bear the thought of losing a 1st.

      Adding Kane to this team could help immensely as they have needed a legit piece on the RW for a while. The Metro isn't as daunting as the Atlantic and helping a shot at the ECF is worth it.
      NYR
        Kane @ 50%

        Kratsov is a change of scenery play.

        Kane could demand going to the NYR.
        6.
        CHI
        1. Kerfoot, Alexander
        2. Minten, Fraser
        3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
        Détails additionnels:
        They have to make a huge swing. Might be better suited going for Cyhchrun or a decent 3C. Kane allows them to do whatever the hell they want in the top 6.
        Kerfoot hasn't performed in the playoffs, and is not that good, don't care.
        Minten is a decent prospect.
        TOR
          Kane @ 50%
          7.
          CHI
          1. Mantha, Anthony
          2. Protas, Aliaksei
          3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (WSH)
          Détails additionnels:
          *Top 10 Protected First

          *They also deal Lars Eller in a different trade to clear cap concerns. This move saves them .5m in cap space.

          Mantha has not performed like a 5.7m/yr player. Getting him off the books for next year helps.

          Ovi-Strome-Kane could be otherworldly with depth behind them.

          Protras is an ok piece, but not a huge loss. Feels like a Capitals style player, though
          WSH
            Kane @ 50%

            Mantha could be flipped next season. Protas is a good piece to add to the system.
            8.
            CHI
            1. Frasca, Jordan
            2. Hållander, Filip
            3. Kapanen, Kasperi
            4. McGinn, Brock
            5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
            6. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (PIT)
            Détails additionnels:
            *Both 1st round picks top 2 Protected.
            PIT
            1. McCabe, Jake (2 000 000 $ retained)
            Détails additionnels:
            Kane @ 50%
            Rachats de contrats
            Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
            Frais appliqués
            Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
            2023
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de TBL
            Logo de BOS
            Logo de COL
            Logo de EDM
            Logo de DAL
            Logo de TOR
            Logo de WSH
            Logo de PIT
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de TBL
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de DAL
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de CHI
            2024
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de TBL
            Logo de PIT
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de VAN
            Logo de DAL
            Logo de EDM
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de OTT
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de CGY
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de CHI
            2025
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de BOS
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de DAL
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de CHI
            Logo de CHI
            TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
            3582 500 000 $101 964 297 $237 500 $1 312 500 $-19 464 297 $
            Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
            AG, AD
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
            C
            NMC
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            800 000 $800 000 $
            AG, C
            RFA - 2
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
            C, AD
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            758 333 $758 333 $
            AG
            RFA - 2
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
            C, AG
            UFA - 2
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            800 000 $800 000 $
            AD, C
            RFA - 2
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            750 000 $750 000 $
            AG, C, AD
            RFA - 1
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
            C, AD
            UFA - 2
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            758 333 $758 333 $
            AD
            RFA - 2
            Logo de Bruins de Boston
            764 167 $764 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
            AG, AD
            RFA - 1
            Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
            847 500 $847 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
            C
            RFA - 3
            Logo de Bruins de Boston
            3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
            AD
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
            2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
            AG, AD
            UFA - 2
            Logo de Stars de Dallas
            894 167 $894 167 $
            C
            RFA - 3
            Logo de Stars de Dallas
            2 900 000 $2 900 000 $
            AD, AG
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
            3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
            AG, C, AD
            M-NTC
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
            875 000 $875 000 $
            C, AG
            RFA - 5
            Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
            870 000 $870 000 $
            AD, C
            RFA - 1
            Logo de Capitals de Washington
            789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
            AD, AG, C
            UFA - 2
            Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
            764 167 $764 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
            C
            RFA - 1
            Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
            3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
            AD
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
            2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
            AG, AD
            UFA - 3
            Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
            859 167 $859 167 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
            C
            RFA - 3
            Logo de Rangers de New York
            875 000 $875 000 $
            AG, AD
            RFA - 1
            Logo de Capitals de Washington
            2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
            AG, AD
            UFA - 2
            Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
            3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
            AD
            UFA - 2
            Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
            DD
            NMC
            UFA - 8
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
            G
            M-NTC
            UFA - 2
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
            DG/DD
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
            DD
            M-NTC
            UFA - 4
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            750 000 $750 000 $
            G
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            950 000 $950 000 $
            DG
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
            DD
            RFA - 1
            Logo de Stars de Dallas
            3 333 333 $3 333 333 $
            G
            UFA - 1
            Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
            AD, C, AG
            M-NTC
            UFA - 2
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            975 000 $975 000 $
            AG, C
            UFA - 1
            Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
            900 000 $900 000 $
            DG
            UFA - 1

            Code d'intégration

            • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
            • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

            Texte intégré

            Cliquer pour surligner
            31 janv. 2023 à 3 h 11
            #1
            Alex
            Avatar de l'utilisateur
            Rejoint: avr. 2022
            Messages: 716
            Mentions "j'aime": 41
            Question. Hope you respond back soon, how do you do 50% retain. I can only get up to 3M retain lol
            31 janv. 2023 à 5 h 18
            #2
            Avatar de l'utilisateur
            Rejoint: janv. 2023
            Messages: 204
            Mentions "j'aime": 37
            Quoting: Giggz77
            Question. Hope you respond back soon, how do you do 50% retain. I can only get up to 3M retain lol


            depends on the player but when you enter "add" to retain and you enter the number that is up to 50% of the current cap hit, for Kane you can enter 5250000
            31 janv. 2023 à 7 h 47
            #3
            Avatar de l'utilisateur
            Rejoint: août 2022
            Messages: 5,519
            Mentions "j'aime": 1,528
            This is going to sound crazy, but i don’t think the bruins are upgrading. I think kane is a downgrade on both of the lines that you mentioned. Debrusk is out producing Kane at this point, and really fits with that line. We all know Kane doesn’t exactly play a third line style, and Frederic has been producing more than Kane at 5 on 5 from an offensive perspective. I just don’t see the upside here.
            31 janv. 2023 à 7 h 48
            #4
            Avatar de l'utilisateur
            Rejoint: juin 2019
            Messages: 11,489
            Mentions "j'aime": 11,554
            Quoting: Giggz77
            Question. Hope you respond back soon, how do you do 50% retain. I can only get up to 3M retain lol


            Use the "+" symbol next to the player after you add them to a trade.
            31 janv. 2023 à 7 h 50
            #5
            Avatar de l'utilisateur
            Rejoint: juin 2019
            Messages: 11,489
            Mentions "j'aime": 11,554
            BOS has every reason not to spend big and upgrade. They may be really good this season, but the writing is on the wall for them in the long term picture and their pipeline is pretty empty.
            31 janv. 2023 à 9 h 24
            #6
            Representing the 505
            Avatar de l'utilisateur
            Rejoint: sept. 2020
            Messages: 4,540
            Mentions "j'aime": 3,721
            Avs pass - they don't need a wing (especially one that doesn't play defense) and aren't going to pay that sort of price for a rental anyhow.
            31 janv. 2023 à 11 h 11
            #7
            hawkman
            Avatar de l'utilisateur
            Rejoint: juill. 2015
            Messages: 703
            Mentions "j'aime": 113
            Quoting: Garak
            BOS has every reason not to spend big and upgrade. They may be really good this season, but the writing is on the wall for them in the long term picture and their pipeline is pretty empty.


            Quoting: Garak
            BOS has every reason not to spend big and upgrade. They may be really good this season, but the writing is on the wall for them in the long term picture and their pipeline is pretty empty.


            So you think the righting is in the wall for this roster because of their age right ??? So why would they not be all in ?? This is best Bruins team I have seen yrs . They need depth because of there age because they might burnout playing every night in playoffs . This team should be all in this year . The point of playing is to win the cup not to look good in the regular season ( Toronto ) the Bruins will go into major rebuild for next season or the season after that's a given . All the more reason to be all in now . I would sacrifice 5 seasons of bottom ten finishes to win a cup without question . As would just about every team and player because that's what this is all about . I am a hawk fan aswell and feel the pain but knowing I got to see my Hawks lift the cup 3 times makes it worth it . Very few fans have seen their team in this day and age win three championships in ten yrs .
            Garak a aimé ceci.
            31 janv. 2023 à 11 h 12
            #8
            hawkman
            Avatar de l'utilisateur
            Rejoint: juill. 2015
            Messages: 703
            Mentions "j'aime": 113
            Quoting: babouie
            So you think the writing is on the wall for this roster because of their age right ??? So why would they not be all in ?? This is the best Bruins team I have seen in yrs . They need depth because of there age because they might burnout playing every night in playoffs . This team should be all in this year . The point of playing is to win the cup not to look good in the regular season ( Toronto ) the Bruins will go into major rebuild for next season or the season after that's a given . All the more reason to be all in now . I would sacrifice 5 seasons of bottom ten finishes to win a cup without question . As would just about every team and player because that's what this is all about . I am a hawk fan aswell and feel the pain but knowing I got to see my Hawks lift the cup 3 times makes it worth it . Very few fans have seen their team in this day and age win three championships in ten yrs .
            31 janv. 2023 à 11 h 20
            #9
            Avatar de l'utilisateur
            Rejoint: juin 2019
            Messages: 11,489
            Mentions "j'aime": 11,554
            Quoting: babouie
            So you think the righting is in the wall for this roster because of their age right ??? So why would they not be all in ?? This is best Bruins team I have seen yrs . They need depth because of there age because they might burnout playing every night in playoffs . This team should be all in this year . The point of playing is to win the cup not to look good in the regular season ( Toronto ) the Bruins will go into major rebuild for next season or the season after that's a given . All the more reason to be all in now . I would sacrifice 5 seasons of bottom ten finishes to win a cup without question . As would just about every team and player because that's what this is all about . I am a hawk fan aswell and feel the pain but knowing I got to see my Hawks lift the cup 3 times makes it worth it . Very few fans have seen their team in this day and age win three championships in ten yrs .


            Yeah, because of their aging players and the thin prospect pool. I don't think BOS should spend big because they are already the most complete team in the NHL by a pretty large margin and they have a really great team chemistry going on. You don't want to mess up that chemistry. If they need to relieve some of the stress off their older players they should be bolstering the bottom 6 and adding depth with players that can eat some of those minutes. They don't have to expend all of their high end assets in order to do that. Those assets are going to be VERY important to BOS in the coming years. I mean, if BOS is offering and Kane and Toews want out and are willing to go to BOS, we'll take it. But I very much doubt things will unfold that way.
            blackhawksfan22 a aimé ceci.
            1 févr. 2023 à 1 h 24
            #10
            Démarrer sujet
            Avatar de l'utilisateur
            Rejoint: avr. 2018
            Messages: 205
            Mentions "j'aime": 25
            Quoting: Garak
            Yeah, because of their aging players and the thin prospect pool. I don't think BOS should spend big because they are already the most complete team in the NHL by a pretty large margin and they have a really great team chemistry going on. You don't want to mess up that chemistry. If they need to relieve some of the stress off their older players they should be bolstering the bottom 6 and adding depth with players that can eat some of those minutes. They don't have to expend all of their high end assets in order to do that. Those assets are going to be VERY important to BOS in the coming years. I mean, if BOS is offering and Kane and Toews want out and are willing to go to BOS, we'll take it. But I very much doubt things will unfold that way.


            Totally agree with not messing up the chemistry and don't see them making a move other than a depth move or something like that.
            Garak a aimé ceci.
             
            Répondre
            To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
            Question:
            Options:
            Ajouter une option
            Soumettre le sondage