SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Contracts that are looking great this season no expiring

Créé par: rext7177
Équipe: 2022-23 Équipe personnalisée
Date de création initiale: 22 déc. 2022
Publié: 22 déc. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
1 Year contracts are ok, more talking about guys like Thompson, Hintz, MacKinnon and such that are on super cheap contracts right now but have big ones coming up next year
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
16182 500 000 $66 225 000 $0 $4 500 000 $116 275 000 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Stars de Dallas
7 750 000 $7 750 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 4
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Bruins de Boston
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 000 000 $$2M)
C
NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Panthers de la Floride
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
DG
NTC, NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Flames de Calgary
4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
4 600 000 $4 600 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
22 déc. 2022 à 12 h 7
#1
Hockey IQ
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 3,056
Mentions "j'aime": 1,502
the chychrun contract will be lookin amazing for whatever team acquires him wink
BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2022 à 12 h 9
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 9,508
Mentions "j'aime": 6,514
Thompsons next contract also looks amazing 😆
wojme a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2022 à 12 h 12
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 638
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: BuFfaLOFaN
Thompsons next contract also looks amazing 😆


Lol you have a point, superstar production at 7.2 mil is amazing
BuFfaLOFaN a aimé ceci.
22 déc. 2022 à 13 h 4
#4
Dougie HIMilton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,071
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
I'm still extremely annoyed that Boston blatantly circumvented the cap and no one paused to give it second thought.

Brilliant move on their part but my team got dinged a first round pick years ago for it and deserve to get it back, now that we've decided that legal circumvention is allowed.
22 déc. 2022 à 13 h 39
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 1,108
Mentions "j'aime": 363
I really like the idea of this post! What about Bunting, Liljegren, Logan Thompson, Lindgren, Devon Toews, Nacas, Hakanpaa, Oettinger, Lindholm, and Rasmus Andersson?
22 déc. 2022 à 13 h 49
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 638
Mentions "j'aime": 201
Quoting: JTrades
I really like the idea of this post! What about Bunting, Liljegren, Logan Thompson, Lindgren, Devon Toews, Nacas, Hakanpaa, Oettinger, Lindholm, and Rasmus Andersson?


Andersson is there, i agree with these choices, the ones i picked were just the ones from the top of my head
22 déc. 2022 à 14 h 48
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,593
Mentions "j'aime": 3,301
Quoting: HeadHighSauce
I'm still extremely annoyed that Boston blatantly circumvented the cap and no one paused to give it second thought.

Brilliant move on their part but my team got dinged a first round pick years ago for it and deserve to get it back, now that we've decided that legal circumvention is allowed.


I’m curious, what did Boston do?
22 déc. 2022 à 14 h 58
#8
Dougie HIMilton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,071
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
I’m curious, what did Boston do?


they gave Bergeron and Krejci performance bonuses that are "play 10 games".

So those contracts are really 5M for Bergeron and 3M for Krejci, with the overages being tacked onto their cap next year.
22 déc. 2022 à 15 h 44
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,593
Mentions "j'aime": 3,301
Quoting: HeadHighSauce
they gave Bergeron and Krejci performance bonuses that are "play 10 games".

So those contracts are really 5M for Bergeron and 3M for Krejci, with the overages being tacked onto their cap next year.


Perfectly legal though. It’s not circumventing if everyone can do it, I don’t think there are restrictions on the type of bonuses. Definitely can see the shadiness behind it though.
22 déc. 2022 à 15 h 59
#10
Dougie HIMilton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,071
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Perfectly legal though. It’s not circumventing if everyone can do it, I don’t think there are restrictions on the type of bonuses. Definitely can see the shadiness behind it though.


exactly, just like the Devils had a perfectly legal contract we were retroactively punished for.
22 déc. 2022 à 16 h 31
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 6,593
Mentions "j'aime": 3,301
Quoting: HeadHighSauce
exactly, just like the Devils had a perfectly legal contract we were retroactively punished for.


Weird part, wasn’t the initial contract rejected and then reworked to become acceptable. Seems they wanted to prove a point with the Devils imo for the future.
22 déc. 2022 à 18 h 28
#12
Dougie HIMilton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,071
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: HOCKEYBOY448
Weird part, wasn’t the initial contract rejected and then reworked to become acceptable. Seems they wanted to prove a point with the Devils imo for the future.

Yup! Rejected and reworked. Now Boston is kicking 60% of the cap hit of two of their best players until next season and no one is saying a word!

Devils deserve that pick back
22 déc. 2022 à 18 h 58
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 2,677
Mentions "j'aime": 1,027
Quoting: HeadHighSauce
I'm still extremely annoyed that Boston blatantly circumvented the cap and no one paused to give it second thought.

Brilliant move on their part but my team got dinged a first round pick years ago for it and deserve to get it back, now that we've decided that legal circumvention is allowed.


MTL lost a shot at the cup in 2021 because Tampa had a 100M+ cap hit. Nobody said anything because it's MTL.
23 déc. 2022 à 7 h 57
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 1,108
Mentions "j'aime": 363
Quoting: HeadHighSauce
they gave Bergeron and Krejci performance bonuses that are "play 10 games".

So those contracts are really 5M for Bergeron and 3M for Krejci, with the overages being tacked onto their cap next year.


If you aint cheating you aint trying. Not saying I like it but I admire their win at all costs mindset (minus Mitchell Miller of course). If you find a loophole that can help you, take it. Any team can do this. What I want though is consistency from the league in dealing with stuff like this. Allow is or set a precedent and stick to it
23 déc. 2022 à 8 h 28
#15
Dougie HIMilton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,071
Mentions "j'aime": 1,629
Quoting: JTrades
If you aint cheating you aint trying. Not saying I like it but I admire their win at all costs mindset (minus Mitchell Miller of course). If you find a loophole that can help you, take it. Any team can do this. What I want though is consistency from the league in dealing with stuff like this. Allow is or set a precedent and stick to it


Yeah I’m not saying I have a problem with it. I think it’s brilliant.

I just can’t believe more people didn’t pitch a fit over it, especially with all the hemming and hawing they did with Kucherov getting hip surgery lol like even if you think Kuch was healthy - I personally don’t but that’s whatever - he at least had a real, serious injury that forced his team to sideline the defending hart trophy winner. How can you be mad at that and not kicking half the cap hit of the best defensive forward in the world to the following year!

Also the Devils should be awarded pick 17 in this years draft as compensation for the pick we lost. But that’s homerism and grievance.
JTrades a aimé ceci.
28 déc. 2022 à 8 h 26
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 1,108
Mentions "j'aime": 363
Quoting: HeadHighSauce
Yeah I’m not saying I have a problem with it. I think it’s brilliant.

I just can’t believe more people didn’t pitch a fit over it, especially with all the hemming and hawing they did with Kucherov getting hip surgery lol like even if you think Kuch was healthy - I personally don’t but that’s whatever - he at least had a real, serious injury that forced his team to sideline the defending hart trophy winner. How can you be mad at that and not kicking half the cap hit of the best defensive forward in the world to the following year!

Also the Devils should be awarded pick 17 in this years draft as compensation for the pick we lost. But that’s homerism and grievance.


Bettman being Bettman. Takes one issues seriously and ignores another one
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage