SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Discuss

Créé par: Wildfan5611
Équipe: 2017-18 Wild du Minnesota
Date de création initiale: 30 mai 2017
Publié: 30 mai 2017
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2017
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de ARI
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2018
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
2019
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
Logo de MIN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
1573 000 000 $60 413 353 $0 $212 500 $12 586 647 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 8
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 1
5 600 000 $5 600 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
3 200 000 $3 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
5 571 429 $5 571 429 $
AG, C
UFA - 4
894 166 $894 166 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
7 538 462 $7 538 462 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
5 187 500 $5 187 500 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
4 166 667 $4 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 4
650 000 $650 000 $
G
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
30 mai 2017 à 14 h 24
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 389
Mentions "j'aime": 28
I would ask for more from COL
30 mai 2017 à 14 h 44
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,221
Mentions "j'aime": 3,642
Both teams say no.
30 mai 2017 à 14 h 47
#3
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 33,053
Mentions "j'aime": 8,999
Pretty sure that Sakic wants LD help not RD like Dumba, Sakic already has Johnson and Barrie at RD.
30 mai 2017 à 14 h 48
#4
Minnesota Wild
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 994
Mentions "j'aime": 335
I'd rather chop my nuts off than see Landeskog on the ice for the Wild. No thanks.

Also, adding him makes it harder to keep Nino and Granny while also worsening the logjam at LW. Granlund alone did better this year than Landeskog did in his best year (13-14).
30 mai 2017 à 14 h 53
#5
MNBassman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2015
Messages: 8,188
Mentions "j'aime": 3,578
I like a lot of what Landeskog could bring to the Wild, but the Wild have a serious log jam at the forward spots going forward. IMO, any trade involving a d-man going out would need to have one coming back...and/or have a forward going out too.
Something like: Dumba and Haula for Landeskog and Nicolas Meloche.
30 mai 2017 à 15 h 17
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 8,221
Mentions "j'aime": 3,642
Quoting: MNBassman
I like a lot of what Landeskog could bring to the Wild, but the Wild have a serious log jam at the forward spots going forward. IMO, any trade involving a d-man going out would need to have one coming back...and/or have a forward going out too.
Something like: Dumba and Haula for Landeskog and Nicolas Meloche.


I do too. Just hard for a trade with that big of names happening within the Division.
Wildfan5611 a aimé ceci.
30 mai 2017 à 15 h 58
#7
Démarrer sujet
Wildfan5611
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 89
Mentions "j'aime": 2
Quoting: wabit
Quoting: MNBassman
I like a lot of what Landeskog could bring to the Wild, but the Wild have a serious log jam at the forward spots going forward. IMO, any trade involving a d-man going out would need to have one coming back...and/or have a forward going out too.
Something like: Dumba and Haula for Landeskog and Nicolas Meloche.


I do too. Just hard for a trade with that big of names happening within the Division.


I was thinking the same that it would be hard to trade within division. It's not necessarily impossible though. We've seen some pretty big names tossed around the central before. Sharp to Dallas, Ladd to Chicago (albeit a rental). Of course those aren't half the magnitude to this trade but Colorado could be a very realistic trade partner this offseason.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage