SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

rest of the season moves

Créé par: Wadejos123
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 8 nov. 2022
Publié: 8 nov. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
I think Kane and Domi stay and extend
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Barrie, Tyson
  2. Foegele, Warren
  3. Petrov, Matvei
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Viewing Barrie and Foegel as dumps, correct me if i'm wrong. This move gives EDM cap flexibility to bring janmark up
2.
CHI
  1. Compher, J.T.
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (COL)
COL
  1. Toews, Jonathan (5 250 000 $ retained)
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (WPG)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
any team looking for mid 6 forward depth
WPG
  1. Athanasiou, Andreas (1 500 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de EDM
Logo de COL
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de DAL
Logo de WPG
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de NYR
Logo de CHI
2024
Logo de CHI
Logo de TBL
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de EDM
Logo de CHI
Logo de OTT
Logo de CHI
Logo de CGY
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
2025
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
Logo de CHI
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $65 134 296 $237 500 $0 $17 365 704 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, C, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Avalanche du Colorado
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
AD, C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
758 333 $758 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
DD
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
950 000 $950 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
866 667 $866 667 $
DD
RFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
975 000 $975 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
925 000 $925 000 $
DG
RFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
8 nov. 2022 à 14 h 16
#1
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
COL shouldn't be moving a 2023 1st for a rental.

Even at 50% retained and moving Comphers cap, it still leaves us too close to the cap ceiling. Which means having to pay more for third party retention, which drives up the price, making Toews that less desirable as a trade target.
TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
8 nov. 2022 à 14 h 34
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 5,765
Mentions "j'aime": 6,090
Quoting: McRanteskog
COL shouldn't be moving a 2023 1st for a rental.

Even at 50% retained and moving Comphers cap, it still leaves us too close to the cap ceiling. Which means having to pay more for third party retention, which drives up the price, making Toews that less desirable as a trade target.


I think Colorado is a team that toews would sign a team friendly extension with. He wants to win and Sakic is his idol.
McRanteskog a aimé ceci.
8 nov. 2022 à 14 h 41
#3
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: SociallyHawkward
I think Colorado is a team that toews would sign a team friendly extension with. He wants to win and Sakic is his idol.


Fair. I guess it would just come down to how friendly of a deal is would be.
SociallyHawkward et TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
8 nov. 2022 à 15 h 2
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 58
Mentions "j'aime": 25
I think Jets would like the player, although they have the cap-space that they don't rly need the retention, so if not retaining takes the 5th off I think they would do that.
8 nov. 2022 à 15 h 8
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 4,825
Jets would like AA. They need to add to the middle six as they don’t get much secondary scoring. Don’t need retention so drop the 5th and you’ve got yourself a deal.
bikelh a aimé ceci.
8 nov. 2022 à 21 h 4
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,322
Mentions "j'aime": 4,970
Quoting: McRanteskog
COL shouldn't be moving a 2023 1st for a rental.

Even at 50% retained and moving Comphers cap, it still leaves us too close to the cap ceiling. Which means having to pay more for third party retention, which drives up the price, making Toews that less desirable as a trade target.


This seems like a year COL should be semi all in, no? last year before Mack's new deal kicks in
9 nov. 2022 à 11 h 57
#7
RETIRED
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 4,846
Mentions "j'aime": 2,481
Quoting: Wadejos123
This seems like a year COL should be semi all in, no? last year before Mack's new deal kicks in


Yes agreed, semi all in. But moving their 2023 1st is not semi in, that's all in (especially when you consider how few picks and prospects they have left after going all in last year)
9 nov. 2022 à 12 h 29
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,162
Mentions "j'aime": 7,791
Barrie has 9 points so far (tied for 18th in the league among defensemen) and is leading the Oilers blueliners with a 61.11 GF% at 5v5. Why are you viewing him as a cap dump?
9 nov. 2022 à 14 h 26
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 8,322
Mentions "j'aime": 4,970
Quoting: CD282
Barrie has 9 points so far (tied for 18th in the league among defensemen) and is leading the Oilers blueliners with a 61.11 GF% at 5v5. Why are you viewing him as a cap dump?


Generally a liability in his own end, and i'll bet on the sample size that is his whole career over the past 15 games. Erik Gustaffson was once top 5 in dman point for the hawks and was still terrible. It's possible to be both. At least Gus make 800k, Barrie makes 4.5M
9 nov. 2022 à 15 h 37
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,162
Mentions "j'aime": 7,791
Quoting: Wadejos123
Generally a liability in his own end, and i'll bet on the sample size that is his whole career over the past 15 games. Erik Gustaffson was once top 5 in dman point for the hawks and was still terrible. It's possible to be both. At least Gus make 800k, Barrie makes 4.5M

That's a tired narrative that doesn't stand the light of day. Barrie had a positive GF% Rel at 5v5 in 8 of the past 9 seasons and is doing it again this year. So it's not a 15 game hot streak, it's the expectation based on a decade worth of results.

He's a 50-point RHD who wins his minutes at 5v5 and costs just $4.5M - and you think he's a cap dump. squinty smile
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage