SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

thoughts

Créé par: tea
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 24 oct. 2022
Publié: 24 oct. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
VAN
  1. Iorio, Vincent
  2. Jensen, Nick
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2024 (WSH)
WSH
  1. Horvat, Bo
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (NYR)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de WSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $77 973 334 $1 250 000 $2 165 000 $4 526 666 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
883 750 $883 750 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
C
RFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
24 oct. 2022 à 11 h 56
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,889
Mentions "j'aime": 6,393
I'd want a 2023 1st also take out the 4th
24 oct. 2022 à 12 h 15
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 8,024
Mentions "j'aime": 3,229
Caps pass. They don't need Horvat, they are stacked at center. And if they really wanted him they'd just wait until the summer to sign him for free.
krakowitz, MVC et NoVaSpartan a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2022 à 12 h 46
#3
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 9,290
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
Quoting: TheAlien
I'd want a 2023 1st also take out the 4th


Doesn't seem like this is a fit at all lol. A top four defenseman, first round pick and solid D prospect for a 2C isn't close whatsoever
ClockReads2113 et NoVaSpartan a aimé ceci.
24 oct. 2022 à 13 h 17
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 1,672
Mentions "j'aime": 1,045
Yeah Caps pass.
24 oct. 2022 à 13 h 28
#5
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: krakowitz
Doesn't seem like this is a fit at all lol. A top four defenseman, first round pick and solid D prospect for a 2C isn't close whatsoever


I mean Horvat is a 30 goal scorer and plays a solid two way game with a very good Fo%. He'd be a 1C on a lot of teams, but the Canucks have Elias Pettersson.

With Bäckström and Wilson out, they kinda need to bolster their offense, I can see them doing something similar to the Mantha trade to do so.
24 oct. 2022 à 14 h 21
#6
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 9,290
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
Quoting: tea
I mean Horvat is a 30 goal scorer and plays a solid two way game with a very good Fo%. He'd be a 1C on a lot of teams, but the Canucks have Elias Pettersson.

With Bäckström and Wilson out, they kinda need to bolster their offense, I can see them doing something similar to the Mantha trade to do so.


And the Caps have Kuznetsov and Strome as their current top six Cs, with Eller at 3C and McMichael capable of playing down the middle as well. There's absolutely no reason to create a whole in the lineup to make a surplus of centers
24 oct. 2022 à 14 h 27
#7
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: krakowitz
And the Caps have Kuznetsov and Strome as their current top six Cs, with Eller at 3C and McMichael capable of playing down the middle as well. There's absolutely no reason to create a whole in the lineup to make a surplus of centers


I don't see how Dylan Strome can be a top 6 center on a contending team, but I get the second part.
24 oct. 2022 à 16 h 40
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2019
Messages: 7,889
Mentions "j'aime": 6,393
Quoting: krakowitz
Doesn't seem like this is a fit at all lol. A top four defenseman, first round pick and solid D prospect for a 2C isn't close whatsoever


You can keep Jensen if you want. A 1st and an okay prospect is not a crazy ask. Let's not act like Iorio is the second coming of Makar lol
24 oct. 2022 à 19 h 50
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,326
Mentions "j'aime": 1,895
Wouldn't trade Jensen for Horvat straight up. He's cracked 60 points once ...
NoVaSpartan a aimé ceci.
25 oct. 2022 à 7 h 39
#10
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: qc14
Wouldn't trade Jensen for Horvat straight up. He's cracked 60 points once ...


yeah, and he's also 27, and has scored 20 goals in 5/6 of his last season (he had 19 in 56 during the 20-21 season). he's coming off a 31 goal season in 70 games, aka a 36 goal 61 point pace, has a career 13% shooting percentage and a career 54% face off rate. he's currently scoring at a 47 goal, 70 point pace despite his team being absolute garbage and the only reason he doesn't have a 40 goal season yet is covid and injuries. you're seriously saying you wouldn't trade a 32 year old defensive defenseman who's probably leaving in free agency for a young two way center with 40 goal potential

if you're gonna act like an idiot, do it somewhere else my guy
25 oct. 2022 à 8 h 40
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,326
Mentions "j'aime": 1,895
Quoting: tea
yeah, and he's also 27, and has scored 20 goals in 5/6 of his last season (he had 19 in 56 during the 20-21 season). he's coming off a 31 goal season in 70 games, aka a 36 goal 61 point pace, has a career 13% shooting percentage and a career 54% face off rate. he's currently scoring at a 47 goal, 70 point pace despite his team being absolute garbage and the only reason he doesn't have a 40 goal season yet is covid and injuries. you're seriously saying you wouldn't trade a 32 year old defensive defenseman who's probably leaving in free agency for a young two way center with 40 goal potential

if you're gonna act like an idiot, do it somewhere else my guy


1) Jensen is much more than a "defensive defenseman" and would easily be the second best D man on the canucks and by far their best RD

https://twitter.com/dicnowder/status/1584706985517539328?s=20&t=Ylc9-0giRd96auzgqa-UDA

2) Marcus Johansson and Conor Sheary are also currently scoring at ~45 goal 70 point paces, and I don't expect them to return a 1st +. If we want to talk about scoring rates though, then it makes no sense for the Caps to replace their current 2c, a career .62 ppg player who is younger and going to make a lot less with a career .64 ppg player.

3) 27 is not young, especially for a forward, and I would only expect Horvat to decline from here rather than get better
25 oct. 2022 à 8 h 49
#12
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,301
Mentions "j'aime": 5,742
Quoting: tea
I mean Horvat is a 30 goal scorer and plays a solid two way game with a very good Fo%. He'd be a 1C on a lot of teams, but the Canucks have Elias Pettersson.

With Bäckström and Wilson out, they kinda need to bolster their offense, I can see them doing something similar to the Mantha trade to do so.


Bad comp for a trade. Mantha for Vrana +2nd was the actual deal made with the 1st being to dump Panik (as reported by Freidman). In reality, I wouldn't deal Jensen for Horvat. Washington already has their top 2 centers for the long haul, with Kuzy locked up with term and Strome playing quite well and being an RFA, Horvat isn't a need at the moment whereas losing Jensen would leave a massive hole at RD and would leave the Caps without arguably their best defenseman. While he is on an expiring deal, there is no reason for him to leave currently as he's getting quality minutes and has great chemistry with other guys on the team, particularly Dowd and Sheary.

Asking for a top 4 RD, a Top 4 RHD prospect in Iorio, and a 1st would be far to much for a Capitals team that has more pressing needs than a 2C on an expiring contract when Brown, Strome, Orlov, Fehervary, and others will need payment come July. Perhaps another team would be foolish enough to pay that much, but the Capitals are not that team.
25 oct. 2022 à 8 h 55
#13
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: qc14
1) Jensen is much more than a "defensive defenseman" and would easily be the second best D man on the canucks and by far their best RD

https://twitter.com/dicnowder/status/1584706985517539328?s=20&t=Ylc9-0giRd96auzgqa-UDA

2) Marcus Johansson and Conor Sheary are also currently scoring at ~45 goal 70 point paces, and I don't expect them to return a 1st +. If we want to talk about scoring rates though, then it makes no sense for the Caps to replace their current 2c, a career .62 ppg player who is younger and going to make a lot less with a career .64 ppg player.

3) 27 is not young, especially for a forward, and I would only expect Horvat to decline from here rather than get better


1. So Horvat only having one 60 point season means he's garbage, but Jensen is an offensive dynamo after only one 20 point season and a decent start this year? I sense some suspect motives in your arguments

2. MoJo is scoring at a 23 goal pace, don't think you can slip that kind of stuff by me. Both of them are also 30+ and have little to no history of consistent top-6 level offence, by your own rules they're both irrelevant to this discussion. Dylan Strome has started well, but is more of a 3C caliber center. Sure he could have a career year, but is that really something a contender wants to rely upon? Also, this discussion isn't really about whether the trade suits either team anymore, you made it about comparing Jensen to Horvat, which is why you're currently being eviscerated.

3. 27 is a lot younger than 32, and nowadays most forwards of his caliber continue to improve up until at least 28-29, and can stay in their primes even into their early to mid 30s. I mean look at Pavelski, he was a point per game player last season and just put up a hat trick, and he's 38. Not saying Horvat's gonna become a 50 goal scorer and stay their into his 40s, but there's no reason to think he won't continue at a 30 goal 60 pt level until his early 30s.


Just stop trying to win this. You say Jensen is more than a defensive defenseman for his veeery minimal sample size of offense, but you don't think Horvat's a goal scorer for the same reason. You think 27 is old, but ignore the fact that Jensen is 32, pretending he's not at a way larger risk of declining. You would absolutely, given the chance, trade Jensen for Horvat, it's that simple.
25 oct. 2022 à 13 h 39
#14
Skip skibbity
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 2,207
Mentions "j'aime": 867
The only way we're trading for Horvat is if Vancouver is taking Eller. Also Iorio really impressed the organization in training camp, and it looks like the team is higher on him than before. So good luck prying him out of Washington.
25 oct. 2022 à 16 h 29
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,326
Mentions "j'aime": 1,895
Quoting: tea
1. So Horvat only having one 60 point season means he's garbage, but Jensen is an offensive dynamo after only one 20 point season and a decent start this year? I sense some suspect motives in your arguments

2. MoJo is scoring at a 23 goal pace, don't think you can slip that kind of stuff by me. Both of them are also 30+ and have little to no history of consistent top-6 level offence, by your own rules they're both irrelevant to this discussion. Dylan Strome has started well, but is more of a 3C caliber center. Sure he could have a career year, but is that really something a contender wants to rely upon? Also, this discussion isn't really about whether the trade suits either team anymore, you made it about comparing Jensen to Horvat, which is why you're currently being eviscerated.

3. 27 is a lot younger than 32, and nowadays most forwards of his caliber continue to improve up until at least 28-29, and can stay in their primes even into their early to mid 30s. I mean look at Pavelski, he was a point per game player last season and just put up a hat trick, and he's 38. Not saying Horvat's gonna become a 50 goal scorer and stay their into his 40s, but there's no reason to think he won't continue at a 30 goal 60 pt level until his early 30s.


Just stop trying to win this. You say Jensen is more than a defensive defenseman for his veeery minimal sample size of offense, but you don't think Horvat's a goal scorer for the same reason. You think 27 is old, but ignore the fact that Jensen is 32, pretending he's not at a way larger risk of declining. You would absolutely, given the chance, trade Jensen for Horvat, it's that simple.


Did you even look at the link I posted with Jensen???? He is not an "offensive defenseman" in terms of racking up points like a Carlson, Hughes, or Josi, but he is much more than just a defensive defenseman as well, tilting the ice to an elite degree for his entire time on the caps as well as his last couple of years in Detroit. Like I said, Jensen would instantly become the Canucks' 2nd best defenseman by a pretty significant margin. As for 27 being old, by literally every single metric NHL forwards peak at age 24 (here's another link you can read if you really are more interested https://hockeyviz.com/static/pdf/ritsac19.pdf). For every Pavelski or Ovechkin there are 10 guys like Lucic, Lee, Okposo, Hayes, JVR, etc.. Horvat is a good offensive player, but has neither the track record nor the runway to improve to be a meaningful upgrade over Strome this year for the Caps. Giving up their 3rd best defenseman and immediately creating a massive hole on the 2nd pairing is in no ways worth that marginal upgrade.
25 oct. 2022 à 16 h 50
#16
Emotionally in 2018
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2016
Messages: 9,290
Mentions "j'aime": 3,387
Quoting: TheAlien
You can keep Jensen if you want. A 1st and an okay prospect is not a crazy ask. Let's not act like Iorio is the second coming of Makar lol


Who said Iorio was the second coming of Makar? All I said was that he's a solid D prospect, which he is. A first and Iorio is a fine deal value wise for Hornet. I don't think it's something the Caps would do from a team needs standpoint, but the value is there definitely
26 oct. 2022 à 15 h 56
#17
Démarrer sujet
i dunno
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,080
Mentions "j'aime": 293
Quoting: qc14
Did you even look at the link I posted with Jensen???? He is not an "offensive defenseman" in terms of racking up points like a Carlson, Hughes, or Josi, but he is much more than just a defensive defenseman as well, tilting the ice to an elite degree for his entire time on the caps as well as his last couple of years in Detroit. Like I said, Jensen would instantly become the Canucks' 2nd best defenseman by a pretty significant margin. As for 27 being old, by literally every single metric NHL forwards peak at age 24 (here's another link you can read if you really are more interested https://hockeyviz.com/static/pdf/ritsac19.pdf). For every Pavelski or Ovechkin there are 10 guys like Lucic, Lee, Okposo, Hayes, JVR, etc.. Horvat is a good offensive player, but has neither the track record nor the runway to improve to be a meaningful upgrade over Strome this year for the Caps. Giving up their 3rd best defenseman and immediately creating a massive hole on the 2nd pairing is in no ways worth that marginal upgrade.


You realise most of those guys not only had their peaks after 24, were either very physical players or injury prone, and are mostly considered outliers, right? I realise Pavelski is also an outlier, I even mentioned that in my post. I'm not expecting Horvat to have decades of his prime left, but the whole "peak at 24" thing is not universal, and can't really be used well when talking about one specific player. A better way to look at it is to compare him to similar players and look at his own progressio.. oh wait, why are you even dragging me into this stupid argument?

You're intentionally dodging the point and moving the goalpost... Once again going on about Jensens importance and how Horvat is gonna become an AHL'er next year because of analytics, but Jensen is never ever ever gonna fall of a cliff and is just gonna keep being this elite two way defenseman you've somehow turned him into forever. Just stop and think about what you're actually saying.

You would rather have Nick Jensen, who I admit is a good defensive defenseman, than Bo Horvat. I get you have your own personal biases as a Caps fan, but Jesus, you have to realise what a stupid argument you're actually making, right? I don't really care what rationalisations you decide to use, they're all pretty easy to disprove, given the chance anyone would trade Nick Jensen for Bo Horvat
26 oct. 2022 à 20 h 14
#18
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 3,326
Mentions "j'aime": 1,895
Quoting: tea
You realise most of those guys not only had their peaks after 24, were either very physical players or injury prone, and are mostly considered outliers, right? I realise Pavelski is also an outlier, I even mentioned that in my post. I'm not expecting Horvat to have decades of his prime left, but the whole "peak at 24" thing is not universal, and can't really be used well when talking about one specific player. A better way to look at it is to compare him to similar players and look at his own progressio.. oh wait, why are you even dragging me into this stupid argument?

You're intentionally dodging the point and moving the goalpost... Once again going on about Jensens importance and how Horvat is gonna become an AHL'er next year because of analytics, but Jensen is never ever ever gonna fall of a cliff and is just gonna keep being this elite two way defenseman you've somehow turned him into forever. Just stop and think about what you're actually saying.

You would rather have Nick Jensen, who I admit is a good defensive defenseman, than Bo Horvat. I get you have your own personal biases as a Caps fan, but Jesus, you have to realise what a stupid argument you're actually making, right? I don't really care what rationalisations you decide to use, they're all pretty easy to disprove, given the chance anyone would trade Nick Jensen for Bo Horvat


Did you not read the last part of my post?

Quoting: qc14
Horvat is a good offensive player, but has neither the track record nor the runway to improve to be a meaningful upgrade over Strome this year for the Caps. Giving up their 3rd best defenseman and immediately creating a massive hole on the 2nd pairing is in no ways worth that marginal upgrade.


There is the very explicit reason why I would not give up Jensen for Horvat straight up.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage