SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

2023 -24

Équipe: 2023-24 Canadiens de Montréal
Date de création initiale: 23 oct. 2022
Publié: 23 oct. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
First 3 trades are 50% retention
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 500 000 $
2850 000 $
2850 000 $
1850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
27 000 000 $
1775 000 $
1775 000 $
Transactions
1.
COL
    Monohan
    2.
    3.
    MTL
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
    2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
    NYI
      Dadonov
      4.
      MTL
      1. Podkolzin, Vasily
      2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
      Détails additionnels:
      4th
      VAN
      1. Anderson, Josh
      2. Teasdale, Joël [Droits de RFA]
      3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (MTL)
      4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
      Détails additionnels:
      8th + 18th
      5.
      MTL
        4th Overall selection: Adam Fantilli
        VAN
        1. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
        6.
        7.
        MTL
        1. Wallstedt, Jesper
        2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (MIN)
        Rachats de contrats
        Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
        2023
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de NYI
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de PIT
        Logo de VGK
        Logo de MIN
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de NYI
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        2024
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de COL
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de EDM
        2025
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de CGY
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        Logo de MTL
        TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
        2382 500 000 $58 851 666 $1 170 000 $4 770 000 $23 648 334 $
        Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 8
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance3 500 000 $$4M)
        AD, AG
        RFA - 2
        7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
        AG
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        3 362 500 $3 362 500 $
        C, AD
        RFA - 3
        Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
        925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
        AD, AG
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        1 100 000 $1 100 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        7 875 000 $7 875 000 $
        C
        UFA - 7
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        850 000 $850 000 $
        AD, AG
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        850 000 $850 000 $
        AG, AD
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        4 450 000 $4 450 000 $
        C
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        3 400 000 $3 400 000 $
        AD, AG
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        1 700 000 $1 700 000 $
        C
        UFA - 2
        Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        4 875 000 $4 875 000 $
        DG
        M-NTC
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
        DD
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
        G
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance420 000 $$420K)
        DG/DD
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        766 667 $766 667 $
        DD
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        890 000 $890 000 $
        G
        RFA - 2
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        828 333 $828 333 $
        DG/DD
        RFA - 1
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        850 000 $850 000 $
        DG/DD
        RFA - 2
        Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
        775 000 $775 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 1
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        6 500 000 $6 500 000 $
        AD, AG
        M-NTC, NMC
        UFA - 4
        775 000 $775 000 $
        AG, AD
        UFA - 2
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
        G
        NMC
        UFA - 3
        Logo de Canadiens de Montréal
        762 500 $762 500 $
        DD
        UFA - 1

        Code d'intégration

        • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
        • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

        Texte intégré

        Cliquer pour surligner
        23 oct. 2022 à 23 h 45
        #1
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: oct. 2021
        Messages: 3,722
        Mentions "j'aime": 821
        Drouin is a cap dump, Habs will have to pay to get rid of that contract
        23 oct. 2022 à 23 h 49
        #2
        Démarrer sujet
        v5 Minnesota GM
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2022
        Messages: 8,122
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,685
        Quoting: Babatunde
        Drouin is a cap dump, Habs will have to pay to get rid of that contract


        @ 2,75m?
        23 oct. 2022 à 23 h 52
        #3
        BRUCE THERE IT IS
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: nov. 2020
        Messages: 1,662
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,187
        Canucks aren't downgrading their pick and trading Podkolzin for Anderson
        remowilliams, majormoose007, OldNYIfan and 6 others a aimé ceci.
        24 oct. 2022 à 0 h 0
        #4
        Ex Nucks fan
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2021
        Messages: 17,615
        Mentions "j'aime": 17,624
        Canucks downgrade pick and lose Podkolzin? Terrible for them
        remowilliams, majormoose007, OldNYIfan and 6 others a aimé ceci.
        24 oct. 2022 à 0 h 1
        #5
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2019
        Messages: 8,348
        Mentions "j'aime": 3,744
        Why in the world would Minnesota consider that?
        OldNYIfan, mv21227, mokumboi and 2 others a aimé ceci.
        24 oct. 2022 à 0 h 12
        #6
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2017
        Messages: 9,819
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,665
        As far as any trade for Monahan goes it should read like this as an answer:

        No thanks.

        Yours very sincerely,

        Colorado Avalanche.
        OldNYIfan et TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
        24 oct. 2022 à 0 h 16
        #7
        Démarrer sujet
        v5 Minnesota GM
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2022
        Messages: 8,122
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,685
        Quoting: cooliny
        Canucks aren't downgrading their pick and trading Podkolzin for Anderson


        Quoting: Juiceman
        Canucks downgrade pick and lose Podkolzin? Terrible for them


        N terms of pick value, Vancouver is getting pretty good. But this is considering, they need a change, and podz needs a change. I'm sure they'd want Josh. It may not be exactly the deal, but I can see it happening.

        Quoting: glarson17
        Why in the world would Minnesota consider that?

        Because they would need a good goalie if Flower is drying out. Maybe Habs add something to that, tho.
        Quoting: TJTwolf
        As far as any trade for Monahan goes it should read like this as an answer:

        No thanks.

        Yours very sincerely,

        Colorado Avalanche.


        You can say that before the year but 3 things
        1. Look at his stats since coming here, they're excellent, along with analytics
        2. The eye test proves the stats correct, just gotta watch some games.
        3. Some avs scout has been at almost very single Habs game since Monohan debuted in the preseason. They're looking closely on him, I would think, as it does make sense, as Newhook isn't playing like a 2C.
        Monohan on the other hand is.
        24 oct. 2022 à 0 h 27
        #8
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2017
        Messages: 9,819
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,665
        Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
        N terms of pick value, Vancouver is getting pretty good. But this is considering, they need a change, and podz needs a change. I'm sure they'd want Josh. It may not be exactly the deal, but I can see it happening.


        Because they would need a good goalie if Flower is drying out. Maybe Habs add something to that, tho.


        You can say that before the year but 3 things
        1. Look at his stats since coming here, they're excellent, along with analytics
        2. The eye test proves the stats correct, just gotta watch some games.
        3. Some avs scout has been at almost very single Habs game since Monohan debuted in the preseason. They're looking closely on him, I would think, as it does make sense, as Newhook isn't playing like a 2C.
        Monohan on the other hand is.


        Point 1 & 2 I'll address together. If he has that good a season then it's likely MTL has a good season and he won't be traded as MTL will at least be a bubble team. They actually have too much talent to be as bad as last year again. I would consider that an abberation. Monahan isn't a great fit for the Avs style, would have to be fully fit and prove it over the course of a season. Again, it's unlikely his skating improves at this point in his career, and again, if he's been fully fit all year that likely contributes to MTL having a solid season so they won't wish to trade him. Third point. The Avs could be scouting anybody IF there has actually been a scout there rather than unsubstantiated rumour. It's already been stated Newhook will be given plenty of time and with GL injured the top 6 isn't looking like it would normally. I'll add a 4th point. CGY gave up a first to move him. Unlikely the Avs give up Olausson (a recent 1st) to get him.
        TheMooterus a aimé ceci.
        24 oct. 2022 à 0 h 30
        #9
        Once a Kings Fan Too
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juin 2018
        Messages: 41,149
        Mentions "j'aime": 25,915
        Podkolzin for the 8th, maybe, if you're right that he needs a change.

        Quoting: glarson17
        Why in the world would Minnesota consider that?


        Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
        Because they would need a good goalie if Flower is drying out. Maybe Habs add something to that, tho.


        Wallstedt will be a good NHL goalie a lot further into the future than Allen.
        24 oct. 2022 à 0 h 36
        #10
        BRUCE THERE IT IS
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: nov. 2020
        Messages: 1,662
        Mentions "j'aime": 1,187
        Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
        N terms of pick value, Vancouver is getting pretty good. But this is considering, they need a change, and podz needs a change. I'm sure they'd want Josh. It may not be exactly the deal, but I can see it happening.


        How is Vancouver getting good pick value? They lose out on Fantilli lmao. Podz does not need a change and certainly not for Josh Anderson
        TheMooterus, Warpbox, OldNYIfan and 2 others a aimé ceci.
        24 oct. 2022 à 1 h 19
        #11
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2020
        Messages: 10,651
        Mentions "j'aime": 9,686
        So the Canucks give up the 2 best assets in the trade and take on Anderson’s horrible contract? Easy pass. They’ll keep Podz and Fantilli in this scenario
        TheMooterus, Warpbox, OldNYIfan and 2 others a aimé ceci.
        24 oct. 2022 à 1 h 32
        #12
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2020
        Messages: 10,651
        Mentions "j'aime": 9,686
        Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
        N terms of pick value, Vancouver is getting pretty good. But this is considering, they need a change, and podz needs a change. I'm sure they'd want Josh. It may not be exactly the deal, but I can see it happening.


        Because they would need a good goalie if Flower is drying out. Maybe Habs add something to that, tho.


        You can say that before the year but 3 things
        1. Look at his stats since coming here, they're excellent, along with analytics
        2. The eye test proves the stats correct, just gotta watch some games.
        3. Some avs scout has been at almost very single Habs game since Monohan debuted in the preseason. They're looking closely on him, I would think, as it does make sense, as Newhook isn't playing like a 2C.
        Monohan on the other hand is.


        Why does Podz need a change? He’s only in year two and looked great on a line with Pettersson and Kuzmenko, he’s a key part of the Canucks future
        TheMooterus, Warpbox, OldNYIfan and 2 others a aimé ceci.
        24 oct. 2022 à 10 h 32
        #13
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2022
        Messages: 3,193
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,263
        Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
        N terms of pick value, Vancouver is getting pretty good. But this is considering, they need a change, and podz needs a change. I'm sure they'd want Josh. It may not be exactly the deal, but I can see it happening.


        Because they would need a good goalie if Flower is drying out. Maybe Habs add something to that, tho.


        You can say that before the year but 3 things
        1. Look at his stats since coming here, they're excellent, along with analytics
        2. The eye test proves the stats correct, just gotta watch some games.
        3. Some avs scout has been at almost very single Habs game since Monohan debuted in the preseason. They're looking closely on him, I would think, as it does make sense, as Newhook isn't playing like a 2C.
        Monohan on the other hand is.


        What makes you think Pods needs a change? Because he’s been one of the teams best players and is one of the most loved guys on the team? Podkolzin is the most untouchable Canucks outside of Petey Hughes and Demko
        OldNYIfan, Juiceman et Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
        24 oct. 2022 à 10 h 32
        #14
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: juill. 2022
        Messages: 3,193
        Mentions "j'aime": 2,263
        Quoting: OldNYIfan
        Podkolzin for the 8th, maybe, if you're right that he needs a change.





        Wallstedt will be a good NHL goalie a lot further into the future than Allen.

        Pods does not need a change
        Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
        24 oct. 2022 à 18 h 12
        #15
        Démarrer sujet
        v5 Minnesota GM
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2022
        Messages: 8,122
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,685
        Quoting: TJTwolf
        Point 1 & 2 I'll address together. If he has that good a season then it's likely MTL has a good season and he won't be traded as MTL will at least be a bubble team. They actually have too much talent to be as bad as last year again. I would consider that an abberation. Monahan isn't a great fit for the Avs style, would have to be fully fit and prove it over the course of a season. Again, it's unlikely his skating improves at this point in his career, and again, if he's been fully fit all year that likely contributes to MTL having a solid season so they won't wish to trade him. Third point. The Avs could be scouting anybody IF there has actually been a scout there rather than unsubstantiated rumour. It's already been stated Newhook will be given plenty of time and with GL injured the top 6 isn't looking like it would normally. I'll add a 4th point. CGY gave up a first to move him. Unlikely the Avs give up Olausson (a recent 1st) to get him.


        Your response to the first point, is completely incorrect.
        I agree on your take, habs will be around a bubble team, around 10th overall.
        But 2 questions.
        1) If theHabs know they're gonna miss the playoffs,why wouldn't they still trade away rentals.
        To add to that question, 2. We have at center: Suzuki, Dach (who's playing like a 2C), Dvorak, Evans.
        We do not need Monohan, we acquired him because
        A. We could
        B. We got assets back.
        On #3, Stu Cowan, very reliable habs reporter, has reported this many times, its not a rumor its reality. And with a stacked team, I'd extremely doubt they'd scout anyone else.
        On #4 , Calgary was in a tight cap situation, needing to sign Kadri, and from the Tkachuk trade. They had to get rid of him. They could've traded him for less, they must have traded him to MTL, because the toffoli trade, worked out, and why not. They were desperate. No one wanted to acquire him. I'll add to that, that, did you see how many conditions on the 1st? Calgary is very worried on giving him up w/an early 1st. They know his 'healthy' value
        I'll add a 5th thing too.
        You can look at habs YouTube game highlights, you can see posts on Twitter.
        All flames fans are acknowledging the great play from him, and saying he's looking like 2017-18 Sean Monohan.
        25 oct. 2022 à 2 h 16
        #16
        oh how i suffer
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: févr. 2019
        Messages: 852
        Mentions "j'aime": 332
        Did you seriously just try to send Mike Hoffman to the Sharks????? Like, to play with Erik Karlsson?

        Man, are you out of your mind, or did you legitimately miss all that drama when it happened?
        TJTwolf a aimé ceci.
        25 oct. 2022 à 9 h 14
        #17
        Démarrer sujet
        v5 Minnesota GM
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2022
        Messages: 8,122
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,685
        Quoting: bunnymcfoo
        Did you seriously just try to send Mike Hoffman to the Sharks????? Like, to play with Erik Karlsson?

        Man, are you out of your mind, or did you legitimately miss all that drama when it happened?


        Forgot
        Good point
        25 oct. 2022 à 13 h 53
        #18
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2017
        Messages: 9,819
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,665
        Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
        Your response to the first point, is completely incorrect.
        I agree on your take, habs will be around a bubble team, around 10th overall.
        But 2 questions.
        1) If theHabs know they're gonna miss the playoffs,why wouldn't they still trade away rentals.
        To add to that question, 2. We have at center: Suzuki, Dach (who's playing like a 2C), Dvorak, Evans.
        We do not need Monohan, we acquired him because
        A. We could
        B. We got assets back.
        On #3, Stu Cowan, very reliable habs reporter, has reported this many times, its not a rumor its reality. And with a stacked team, I'd extremely doubt they'd scout anyone else.
        On #4 , Calgary was in a tight cap situation, needing to sign Kadri, and from the Tkachuk trade. They had to get rid of him. They could've traded him for less, they must have traded him to MTL, because the toffoli trade, worked out, and why not. They were desperate. No one wanted to acquire him. I'll add to that, that, did you see how many conditions on the 1st? Calgary is very worried on giving him up w/an early 1st. They know his 'healthy' value
        I'll add a 5th thing too.
        You can look at habs YouTube game highlights, you can see posts on Twitter.
        All flames fans are acknowledging the great play from him, and saying he's looking like 2017-18 Sean Monohan.


        The first point is an opinion in part of which yours and mine differ. So to say it's incorrect when we're still waiting for whether part of it happens or not is silly unless you have a crystal ball. Simply skipping over a lot of the points and not addressing them doesn't validate your opinion. The Habs have a roster on which there are many players the Avs could be interested in. To say it's SM or nothing is also silly. It's also highly probable Colorado scouts and other teams scouts will be at other teams stadiums throughout the season. It's kind of a thing they do called their job, and I just googled Cowan and couldn't see anything immediately relating to Avs scouts at Habs games but I'll admitit was a cursory look. Regardless of Calgary's situation the point still stands. They gave up a first to ditch him. The Avs aren't likely to part with Olausson or the '23 1st to get him. If we were talking Kaut then I'd agree the Avs could be in on it, as he doesn't seem to be in favour in the organisation, but of course the Habs would want more. It's simply not a fit to me. But then I can always be proven wrong.
        25 oct. 2022 à 18 h 8
        #19
        Démarrer sujet
        v5 Minnesota GM
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2022
        Messages: 8,122
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,685
        Quoting: TJTwolf
        The first point is an opinion in part of which yours and mine differ. So to say it's incorrect when we're still waiting for whether part of it happens or not is silly unless you have a crystal ball. Simply skipping over a lot of the points and not addressing them doesn't validate your opinion. The Habs have a roster on which there are many players the Avs could be interested in. To say it's SM or nothing is also silly. It's also highly probable Colorado scouts and other teams scouts will be at other teams stadiums throughout the season. It's kind of a thing they do called their job, and I just googled Cowan and couldn't see anything immediately relating to Avs scouts at Habs games but I'll admitit was a cursory look. Regardless of Calgary's situation the point still stands. They gave up a first to ditch him. The Avs aren't likely to part with Olausson or the '23 1st to get him. If we were talking Kaut then I'd agree the Avs could be in on it, as he doesn't seem to be in favour in the organisation, but of course the Habs would want more. It's simply not a fit to me. But then I can always be proven wrong.


        https://twitter.com/StuCowan1/status/1583959693965131776?s=20&t=4T7Get6hdCMGn7GYsWlepA
        25 oct. 2022 à 18 h 9
        #20
        Démarrer sujet
        v5 Minnesota GM
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2022
        Messages: 8,122
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,685
        Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
        https://twitter.com/StuCowan1/status/1583959693965131776?s=20&t=4T7Get6hdCMGn7GYsWlepA


        @tjtwolf
        https://twitter.com/StuCowan1/status/1583959693965131776?s=20&t=4T7Get6hdCMGn7GYsWlepA
        26 oct. 2022 à 7 h 42
        #21
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2017
        Messages: 9,819
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,665


        And as you'll note in the first handful of replies at least 4 of your roster are mentioned!
        26 oct. 2022 à 18 h 9
        #22
        Démarrer sujet
        v5 Minnesota GM
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2022
        Messages: 8,122
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,685
        Quoting: TJTwolf
        And as you'll note in the first handful of replies at least 4 of your roster are mentioned!


        He was here yesterday at the wild game too..
        26 oct. 2022 à 22 h 11
        #23
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2017
        Messages: 9,819
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,665
        Quoting: DucharmetheDOMinator
        He was here yesterday at the wild game too..


        Which still means exactly the same thing. Not even sure what you're trying to achieve now as if in some way it reinforces the argument further. tears of joy
        26 oct. 2022 à 22 h 22
        #24
        Démarrer sujet
        v5 Minnesota GM
        Avatar de l'utilisateur
        Rejoint: janv. 2022
        Messages: 8,122
        Mentions "j'aime": 4,685
        Quoting: TJTwolf
        Which still means exactly the same thing. Not even sure what you're trying to achieve now as if in some way it reinforces the argument further. tears of joy


        We will see what happens
         
        Répondre
        To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
        Question:
        Options:
        Ajouter une option
        Soumettre le sondage