SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Its time

Créé par: Pmatychuk13
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 5 oct. 2022
Publié: 5 oct. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
EDM
  1. Chychrun, Jakob (1 916 667 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
I’ve added that Arizona take the rest of James Neals buyout in the trade. So Arizona isn’t actually retaining any salary I just did that to show the Neal money coming off edmontons cap.
ARI
  1. Broberg, Philip
  2. Puljujärvi, Jesse
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $82 432 333 $896 000 $1 350 000 $67 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
798 000 $798 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
2 683 333 $2 683 333 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
5 oct. 2022 à 11 h 5
#1
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
I mean, I could be wrong, but I'm 99% sure that you absolutely can't trade buyout money...
Artsy19, CD282 et Pmatychuk13 a aimé ceci.
5 oct. 2022 à 11 h 6
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 40,499
Mentions "j'aime": 18,460
Can’t trade penalties
Artsy19, CD282 et Pmatychuk13 a aimé ceci.
5 oct. 2022 à 11 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
As others have said, you can't move the James Neal dead money. And Holland won't trade Broberg for Chychrun.

It really doesn't make a lot of sense for Edmonton to submit the high bid for Chychrun, as they have their top-4 LHD set for the rest of the decade and they don't like playing defensemen on their offside.
Pmatychuk13 a aimé ceci.
5 oct. 2022 à 12 h 9
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: CD282
As others have said, you can't move the James Neal dead money. And Holland won't trade Broberg for Chychrun.

It really doesn't make a lot of sense for Edmonton to submit the high bid for Chychrun, as they have their top-4 LHD set for the rest of the decade and they don't like playing defensemen on their offside.



Learn something new everyday! I don’t see why Edmonton wouldn’t be going after Chychrun, other than maybe his injury history. If they added him they’d have their entire LD set for the next 3 years no question. At this point Broberg is a question mark as to what kind of player he’s going to be. Maybe he’ll be a top 4 one day but they can’t wait for him to develop. Plus Samorukov and Neimelanen can make Broberg dispensable imo. Especially right now since I think they’ve both out played him in preseason.
5 oct. 2022 à 13 h 23
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,091
Mentions "j'aime": 7,772
Quoting: Pmatychuk13
Learn something new everyday! I don’t see why Edmonton wouldn’t be going after Chychrun, other than maybe his injury history. If they added him they’d have their entire LD set for the next 3 years no question. At this point Broberg is a question mark as to what kind of player he’s going to be. Maybe he’ll be a top 4 one day but they can’t wait for him to develop.

They have LHD set up for 4 years already. Kulak is the 2LD until such time as Broberg surpasses him, then he's a 3LD until his contract is over. If Samorukov or Niemelainen pass him he can be traded (he doesn't have any trade protection) or moved to the right side.

Chychrun is better than Kulak, but I think Holland made his choice in the summer. He did try to land Chychrun but when Armstrong insisted Broberg be part of the deal Holland walked away and went with Kulak instead.

Quoting: Pmatychuk13
Plus Samorukov and Neimelanen can make Broberg dispensable imo. Especially right now since I think they’ve both out played him in preseason.

I don't agree with that assessment. Nemo hits a lot but often takes himself out of the play seeking big hits, and he has zero offensive instincts. Dima has been quietly effective but against mostly AHL comp, offensively he deferred almost completely to Barrie.

Plus Broberg has a much higher ceiling then either.
5 oct. 2022 à 14 h 16
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 6
Quoting: CD282
They have LHD set up for 4 years already. Kulak is the 2LD until such time as Broberg surpasses him, then he's a 3LD until his contract is over. If Samorukov or Niemelainen pass him he can be traded (he doesn't have any trade protection) or moved to the right side.

Chychrun is better than Kulak, but I think Holland made his choice in the summer. He did try to land Chychrun but when Armstrong insisted Broberg be part of the deal Holland walked away and went with Kulak instead.


I don't agree with that assessment. Nemo hits a lot but often takes himself out of the play seeking big hits, and he has zero offensive instincts. Dima has been quietly effective but against mostly AHL comp, offensively he deferred almost completely to Barrie.

Plus Broberg has a much higher ceiling then either.


I think best case scenario is Broberg turns out to be a similar level of player that Chychrun is right now so that’s where my thoughts of why not make that move to better the team while we have the window. Like you said though Holland won’t trade him so this trade doesn’t really matter. Just something for me.

I agree that Broberg has the higher ceiling for sure, but how long are you willing wait for Broberg to become that top 4 guy? All I meant was right now I don’t see Broberg being above and beyond Neimo or Samo on the depth chart, they’re all pretty close imo. Making Broberg the dispensable one if you’re upgrading the LD by trading him because he has the most value. I’d rather have Nurse Chychrun Kulak down the left side starting right now for the next 3+ years.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage