SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tml 2023

Créé par: BRenaud11
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 16 sept. 2022
Publié: 16 sept. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
11 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (ARI)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
Logo de TOR
Logo de ARI
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de OTT
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $82 155 616 $212 500 $850 000 $344 384 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AD, C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
4 687 500 $4 687 500 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
16 sept. 2022 à 14 h 35
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,914
Mentions "j'aime": 20,528
The Rangers trade will never happen simply there is solid logic to it
NYR1983 a aimé ceci.
16 sept. 2022 à 15 h 36
#2
LongtimeLeafsufferer
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2015
Messages: 61,260
Mentions "j'aime": 23,593
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
The Rangers trade will never happen simply there is solid logic to it


Teams really shouldn't be trading players under contract just because they are unhappy. Then you get others declaring to be unhappy just so they hope to get traded. Lundqvist stays a Ranger inthat scenario, and Sandin.....I kinda feel for the guy, but until a offer sheet is forthcoming, unless he agrees to the Leafs offer, or is playing in Sweden this year.
16 sept. 2022 à 17 h 13
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 58
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
The Rangers trade will never happen simply there is solid logic to it


Drury has come out and said he is good with the depth on defense at the NHL level. and that he most likely will not bring in another D on a PTO. Lundkvist had a chance to compete for 3rd line LHD on his off-side against two other prospects, but he is only going to be happy if he is sent to a team where he plays top 4 minutes RHD and has a chance to compete for PP1 QB duties. NYR does not need another LD in the mix that is not waiver-exempt and will upset the cap space.
16 sept. 2022 à 17 h 56
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,914
Mentions "j'aime": 20,528
Quoting: busters99
Drury has come out and said he is good with the depth on defense at the NHL level. and that he most likely will not bring in another D on a PTO. Lundkvist had a chance to compete for 3rd line LHD on his off-side against two other prospects, but he is only going to be happy if he is sent to a team where he plays top 4 minutes RHD and has a chance to compete for PP1 QB duties. NYR does not need another LD in the mix that is not waiver-exempt and will upset the cap space.


Many things I don't agree with here or just dont really get your argument.
Being good with the NHL depth on defense does not mean you don't want to improve it.
Lundkvist has come out and said he will not be attending camp so no he doesn't have a chance at the 3LD role.
I don't see how the waiver exempt part is relevant since Jones is exempt and clearly less proven. And the cost difference also shouldn't be particularly relevant either
16 sept. 2022 à 18 h 38
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 199
Mentions "j'aime": 58
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Many things I don't agree with here or just dont really get your argument.
Being good with the NHL depth on defense does not mean you don't want to improve it.
Lundkvist has come out and said he will not be attending camp so no he doesn't have a chance at the 3LD role.
I don't see how the waiver exempt part is relevant since Jones is exempt and clearly less proven. And the cost difference also shouldn't be particularly relevant either


"Being good with the NHL depth on defense does not mean you don't want to improve it."
The priority is spending resources on center depth, not LHD. Sandin will block other cheap highly rated prospects

"Lundkvist has come out and said he will not be attending camp so no he doesn't have a chance at the 3LD role."
He had the chance to compete but chose to forgo it. Something that points to why he will not be happy on another team in a diminished role.

"I don't see how the waiver exempt part is relevant since Jones is exempt and clearly less proven. And the cost difference also shouldn't be particularly relevant either"
Rangers are in a cap crunch with many implications including cap growth at the trade deadline
Sandin was looking for guarantees about playing time and I guess you would say he definitely will be 3LD but that is not certain. He could be occupying a spot on the roster that would prevent other roster moves from happening during the season.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage