SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Made a mess but it was fun

Créé par: Birtle34
Équipe: 2022-23 Jets de Winnipeg
Date de création initiale: 9 sept. 2022
Publié: 9 sept. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
12 100 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Barron, Morgan
  2. Heinola, Ville
  3. Stanley, Logan
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (WPG)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de NYR
Logo de WPG
2024
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
2025
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $82 437 025 $0 $2 050 000 $62 975 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
7 142 857 $7 142 857 $
AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
2 166 667 $2 166 667 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
8 250 000 $8 250 000 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Rangers de New York
875 000 $875 000 $
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
3 641 667 $3 641 667 $
C, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Rangers de New York
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 250 000 $6 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
6 166 667 $6 166 667 $
G
UFA - 2
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 875 000 $5 875 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
900 000 $900 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance350 000 $$350K)
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
5 950 000 $5 950 000 $
DG/DD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Jets de Winnipeg
750 000 $750 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 sept. 2022 à 11 h 16
#1
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Brendan Dillon isn’t worth Lundkvist and Kravtsov. He might not even be worth Goodrow. Rangers say no.
Spanky227 a aimé ceci.
9 sept. 2022 à 11 h 20
#2
Démarrer sujet
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,670
Mentions "j'aime": 3,280
Quoting: Isles5513
Brendan Dillon isn’t worth Lundkvist and Kravtsov. He might not even be worth Goodrow. Rangers say no.


Too get out from under that goodrow contract worth something, lundquist and kravtsov both with a foot out the door, reaves a dump of money, in a cap world, makes it closer than you think. Possibly gave too much to Toronto and not enough to ny, but makes the jets kind of interesting? Or prolongs a rebuild.
9 sept. 2022 à 11 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 6,731
Mentions "j'aime": 4,825
Quoting: Birtle34
Too get out from under that goodrow contract worth something, lundquist and kravtsov both with a foot out the door, reaves a dump of money, in a cap world, makes it closer than you think. Possibly gave too much to Toronto and not enough to ny, but makes the jets kind of interesting? Or prolongs a rebuild.


Why trade for sandin? They don’t need him and they need the roster spots anyways for guys like Kovacevic/Gawanke. Just do kerfoot for a 3rd/4th. Use some of the pieces from TOR to sweeten the NY deal. Gus, Heinola and the 2nd for Kravtsov and Lundkvist?

I have no idea, but I would be interested in both Kravtsov and Lundkvist.

Dillon & Stanley get moved somewhere else.

If you do that; you’re swapping some prospects that need different opportunities. While also not prolonging the rebuild.
Birtle34 a aimé ceci.
9 sept. 2022 à 11 h 28
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,902
Mentions "j'aime": 7,069
Wouldn't it be better to just trade these guys for picks instead of taking back bad contracts and problem players? Are you trying to rebuild?

It just seems like a lot of trading meh players for different meh players. Other than Heinola.
9 sept. 2022 à 11 h 30
#5
Démarrer sujet
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,670
Mentions "j'aime": 3,280
Quoting: Windjammer
Wouldn't it be better to just trade these guys for picks instead of taking back bad contracts and problem players? Are you trying to rebuild?

It just seems like a lot of trading meh players for different meh players. Other than Heinola.


Quoting: Windjammer
Wouldn't it be better to just trade these guys for picks instead of taking back bad contracts and problem players? Are you trying to rebuild?

It just seems like a lot of trading meh players for different meh players. Other than Heinola.

Ending my night shift, might have wondered down a bit of a rabbit hole lol
9 sept. 2022 à 11 h 34
#6
Démarrer sujet
Bandwagon fairweathe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 7,670
Mentions "j'aime": 3,280
Quoting: tsyls
Why trade for sandin? They don’t need him and they need the roster spots anyways for guys like Kovacevic/Gawanke. Just do kerfoot for a 3rd/4th. Use some of the pieces from TOR to sweeten the NY deal. Gus, Heinola and the 2nd for Kravtsov and Lundkvist?

I have no idea, but I would be interested in both Kravtsov and Lundkvist.

Dillon & Stanley get moved somewhere else.

If you do that; you’re swapping some prospects that need different opportunities. While also not prolonging the rebuild.

I think with some opportunity sandin could be a interesting add, along with kerfoot, couple bargain jets going forward possibly, ya empty an abundance of ld and replace with mediocre isn’t exactly ideal. Sandin/pionk might be a little light, but probably a decent offensive mobile pair. Morrissey/demelo and samberg/lundquist would all be effective puck movers, but all rather light other than samberg, so ya your probably right on leaving sandin in Toronto.
9 sept. 2022 à 11 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 15,902
Mentions "j'aime": 7,069
Quoting: Birtle34
Ending my night shift, might have wondered down a bit of a rabbit hole lol


Lol. Got ya'. That's funny!

I really wouldn't mind Goodrow if his contract wasn't such a fart in an elevator.
Birtle34 a aimé ceci.
9 sept. 2022 à 11 h 54
#8
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Birtle34
Too get out from under that goodrow contract worth something, lundquist and kravtsov both with a foot out the door, reaves a dump of money, in a cap world, makes it closer than you think. Possibly gave too much to Toronto and not enough to ny, but makes the jets kind of interesting? Or prolongs a rebuild.


Terrible deal for NY. Goodrow deal isn’t a big issue for them rn. And if ur taking salary back it’s not even worth it.
Birtle34 a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage