Quoting: drmantalban
Yeah it's a very valid question. It seems like the plan is to try and tread water over the next 3 years while being reasonably competitive - i.e. mushy middle, vying for WC spot. There is a 1 year window after these 3 year buyouts where it's Kaprizov's last year under contract and we theoretically should have a ton of money along with some solid prospects being more mature - Boldy, Rossi, Addison, Faber, Yurov, Wallstedt, etc.
Kinda shaping up like that could be an all-in year.
Obviously that's far out to project and gets dicey with Kaprizov being a pending UFA. Will he want to stick around if we spend the next 3 years being mediocre?
Lots of questions, but it's frustrating being handcuffed during our franchise players prime - especially since we've never really had a stud player besides Gaborik. The buyouts are what they are, so not expecting sympathy from any other fanbases -it's just the timing of everything that's tough.
Yeah, I'm a bit surprised Guerin hasn't elaborated further on being stuck in sort of this rock and a hard place. I guess the team will see how well they perform this upcoming season, and hey, there's no reason why they can't be a lock for the playoffs, but over a 3 year window, it will be interesting to see how Kaprizov reacts should the realization sink in that he has to spend a significant chunk of his contract on a team with a harsh ceiling like the Wild are in. Yeah, the Wild have a strong prospect system, but that's partially out of cap necessity in needing to move out high impact players for future assets. With a future core of Boldy, Ohgren, Yurov, Khusnutdinov, Beckman, Lambos, Hunt, O'Rourke, Faber, and Addison, I guess you can ask the question, do the Wild NEED Kaprizov to be a contender? If not, maybe they should explore the possibility of trading him, and getting EVEN MORE future assets