SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Oilers deadline moves

Créé par: dls9
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 25 août 2022
Publié: 26 août 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Move Barrie BEFORE the season.

Trade for Kane and Klingberg mid season (deadline).
Transactions
1.
EDM
  1. Kane, Patrick (5 250 000 $ retained)
CHI
2.
EDM
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
3.
EDM
  1. Klingberg, John (3 500 000 $ retained)
ANA
  1. Savoie, Carter
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (EDM)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $72 384 333 $896 000 $2 200 000 $10 115 667 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
-2 625 000 $-2 625 000 $
AD
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
870 000 $870 000 $
AD, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
0 $0 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
775 000 $775 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 août 2022 à 14 h 20
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
As an oilers fan I'd be very upset if Holland went in this direction.
gary_ et CD282 a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 20
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,145
Mentions "j'aime": 5,953
Ducks decline, Look at what Lindholm got, thats what theyre going to get for Klingberg
SpinyLiving a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 23
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,627
Mentions "j'aime": 588
Quoting: Salzy
Ducks decline, Look at what Lindholm got, thats what theyre going to get for Klingberg


Lindholm is a much better defenseman than klingberg.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 24
#4
Future Norris guy
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 15,605
Mentions "j'aime": 8,625
Ducks and Hawks pass.

Patrick Kane will be a Ranger.

And not enough for Klingberg at 50% retention.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 24
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,145
Mentions "j'aime": 5,953
Quoting: gary_gobbler
Lindholm is a much better defenseman than klingberg.


And Klingberg is a much better offensive defenseman than Lindholm, they have very similar values
SpinyLiving a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 29
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,627
Mentions "j'aime": 588
Quoting: Salzy
And Klingberg is a much better offensive defenseman than Lindholm, they have very similar values


Lindholm's offence greatly outweighs klingbergs defense. Lindholm is by far the better all around defensemen, we don't need another offensive dman anyway
CD282 a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 30
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 325
Mentions "j'aime": 198
Ducks will 100% get at least a first round pick for Klingberg, maybe more if he excels. Like Salzy said, they'll probably get a similar return to Hampus Lindholm. Kane trade isn't terrible, but Hawks will ask for 2 firsts for Kane and an extra pick/prospect to take Foegle. They won't take a cap dump for free.
BeefBouillon a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 30
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 5,145
Mentions "j'aime": 5,953
Quoting: gary_gobbler
Lindholm's offence greatly outweighs klingbergs defense. Lindholm is by far the better all around defensemen, we don't need another offensive dman anyway


I am aware of Lindholms game. And They are insanley similar in value

Oilers not needing another Offensive Dman has nothing to do with me I didnt make this ACGM

Klingberg easily starts at a 1st + a good prospect with 50% retention
GeneralLandro et SpinyLiving a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 32
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,627
Mentions "j'aime": 588
Quoting: Salzy
I am aware of Lindholms game. And They are insanley similar in value

Oilers not needing another Offensive Dman has nothing to do with me I didnt make this ACGM

Klingberg easily starts at a 1st + a good prospect with 50% retention



whatever floats your boat, he's overrated
CD282 et Timmah007 a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 41
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,567
Mentions "j'aime": 11,949
Quoting: Salzy
I am aware of Lindholms game. And They are insanley similar in value

Oilers not needing another Offensive Dman has nothing to do with me I didnt make this ACGM

Klingberg easily starts at a 1st + a good prospect with 50% retention


if we get anything less than what MTL got for Chiarot, I will be very disappointed
getzlafshair a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 14 h 41
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2016
Messages: 10,506
Mentions "j'aime": 3,721
I highly doubt Barrie will ever be on the Sens radar. They want to improve 5on5 defensive play.

They won't need a PP specialist

Chabot - Brannstrom - Sanderson

But Batherson, Stutzle can play the point (and be excellent)

Plus all of DeBrincat, Norris, Giroux, Tkachuk, Pinto, etc
26 août 2022 à 16 h 19
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2022
Messages: 112
Mentions "j'aime": 84
As long as Barrie, Bouchard and Ceci are good enough and hold down the RD spots, a trade for Klingberg may not make sense for Edmonton.
But come trade deadline time, if Klingberg's production doesn't fall off a cliff, I think the going rate is a prospect and a 2023 1st.

As for Kane, I think his going rate (unless Kyle Davidson messes up) is: established player/good prospect, a middling prospect, and a 1st along with another 1st to retain 50%.
26 août 2022 à 16 h 21
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,087
Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
Barrie is every bit as good as Klingberg. This is terrible asset management.
BeefBouillon et gary_ a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 16 h 59
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: CD282
Barrie is every bit as good as Klingberg. This is terrible asset management.


I'd say Barrie is better but even if consider it a wash we know Barrie and we know he fits in extremely well within the dressing room so the only thing I can see this do is upset chemistry. I see no positive what so ever. I personally wish this Kane talk would die down just don't see any possible way to do it without removing a part of the team we need more than Kane. Maybe a huge splash the following year when not starting the year in ltir and have more wiggle room for deadline.
CD282 a aimé ceci.
26 août 2022 à 17 h 3
#15
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: BeefBouillon
As long as Barrie, Bouchard and Ceci are good enough and hold down the RD spots, a trade for Klingberg may not make sense for Edmonton.
But come trade deadline time, if Klingberg's production doesn't fall off a cliff, I think the going rate is a prospect and a 2023 1st.

As for Kane, I think his going rate (unless Kyle Davidson messes up) is: established player/good prospect, a middling prospect, and a 1st along with another 1st to retain 50%.


I don't think Chicago can ask for additional assets for retention or get too hung up on taking back money otherwise they will get nothing he makes way way too much for any team that would be interested to fit in at this point.
26 août 2022 à 18 h 0
#16
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,087
Mentions "j'aime": 7,771
Quoting: Timmah007
I'd say Barrie is better but even if consider it a wash we know Barrie and we know he fits in extremely well within the dressing room so the only thing I can see this do is upset chemistry. I see no positive what so ever. I personally wish this Kane talk would die down just don't see any possible way to do it without removing a part of the team we need more than Kane. Maybe a huge splash the following year when not starting the year in ltir and have more wiggle room for deadline.


From reports, Kane doesn't want to move until the deadline anyhow.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage