SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

swing for the fences

Créé par: scottysniper
Équipe: 2022-23 Oilers d'Edmonton
Date de création initiale: 31 juill. 2022
Publié: 31 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Oilers cup window is probably 3 years, Chychrun contract is 3 years. Can’t see holland pulling off something big like this but I can dream
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
43 250 000 $
2800 000 $
31 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
21 750 000 $
Transactions
EDM
  1. Chychrun, Jakob (1 600 000 $ retained)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2024
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
2025
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
Logo de EDM
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $82 238 500 $896 000 $1 350 000 $261 500 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, AD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
12 500 000 $12 500 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 125 000 $5 125 000 $
AG, C
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
C, AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance500 000 $$500K)
AG, C
RFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
9 250 000 $9 250 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Coyotes de l'Arizona
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 167 000 $4 167 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
2 200 000 $2 200 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
762 500 $762 500 $
C, AG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 juill. 2022 à 11 h 10
#1
hockeyman
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2016
Messages: 36
Mentions "j'aime": 9
Huge overpay for Chychrun. He can had for less. Otherwise I like the roster.
31 juill. 2022 à 11 h 12
#2
Simpleton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,365
Mentions "j'aime": 502
I see at least two issues with your bottom six forwards, and I don't think adding Chychrun and Stralman compensates for them.
31 juill. 2022 à 11 h 12
#3
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Irish
Huge overpay for Chychrun. He can had for less. Otherwise I like the roster.


He cleared a lot of cap space and got retention. I think Arizona says no to this, but I’d make the move just to get myself some maneuvering room.
31 juill. 2022 à 11 h 14
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
I hate these 5 or 6 or 7 assets for one types of trades creates soo many organizational holes that once the big main window trying to win in ends there is very little hope in extending it. Considering the players that need to be signed during that window seems very risky
Spanky_McButtCakes a aimé ceci.
31 juill. 2022 à 11 h 27
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: uphere
I see at least two issues with your bottom six forwards, and I don't think adding Chychrun and Stralman compensates for them.

What would those issues be? I think holloway mcleod pulju could be a strong 3rd line. Yeah the 4th isn’t fantastic but I think it’s serviceable
31 juill. 2022 à 11 h 38
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: Timmah007
I hate these 5 or 6 or 7 assets for one types of trades creates soo many organizational holes that once the big main window trying to win in ends there is very little hope in extending it. Considering the players that need to be signed during that window seems very risky

I get your point, but there’s no guarantee the oilers can keep mcdavid or draisaitl in town once their contracts are up. Yes 6 pieces are going to Arizona but 2 are roster players (Barrie, Foegele) who have cheaper replacements (Bouchard, Holloway). Let’s say that you’re overpaying AZ with Schaefer to take on those contracts (and to retain salary). The trade is then essentially Broberg, Lavoie and a 1st for Chychrun. Maybe this creates holes in the future but their chances at a cup before McD/Drai contracts expire are likely better off letting go of a top D prospect for a current top 4 dman.
31 juill. 2022 à 11 h 46
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: Irish
Huge overpay for Chychrun. He can had for less. Otherwise I like the roster.


Yes, maybe he could be had for less, but have to overpay for retention and to get barrie/foegele off the books. Oilers prospect pool is decent so I think it’s worth giving up a few to make this happen.
31 juill. 2022 à 13 h 51
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 8,634
Mentions "j'aime": 3,931
Quoting: scottysniper
I get your point, but there’s no guarantee the oilers can keep mcdavid or draisaitl in town once their contracts are up. Yes 6 pieces are going to Arizona but 2 are roster players (Barrie, Foegele) who have cheaper replacements (Bouchard, Holloway). Let’s say that you’re overpaying AZ with Schaefer to take on those contracts (and to retain salary). The trade is then essentially Broberg, Lavoie and a 1st for Chychrun. Maybe this creates holes in the future but their chances at a cup before McD/Drai contracts expire are likely better off letting go of a top D prospect for a current top 4 dman.


Deal built around broberg for chychrun I'm not for but willing to listen depending on how able to make the cap work. I personally don't see how without causing a bigger hole elsewhere. Barrie in my opinion shouldn't be in any conversations for at least another year still need him alot more than most fans recognize.
31 juill. 2022 à 14 h 5
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 22
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: Timmah007
Deal built around broberg for chychrun I'm not for but willing to listen depending on how able to make the cap work. I personally don't see how without causing a bigger hole elsewhere. Barrie in my opinion shouldn't be in any conversations for at least another year still need him alot more than most fans recognize.

I agree Barrie is more useful than most think, but with money being tight I just don’t love his cap hit, and would prefer flexibility and more of a shutdown guy. I have faith in Bouchard being able to fill the PP1 role and continue to develop his defensive game, so I really don’t see a reason to keep Barrie around if you can replace his production cheaper (Bouchard stepping up, signing a veteran like Stralman).
1 août 2022 à 18 h 37
#10
Simpleton
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 1,365
Mentions "j'aime": 502
Quoting: scottysniper
What would those issues be? I think holloway mcleod pulju could be a strong 3rd line. Yeah the 4th isn’t fantastic but I think it’s serviceable


There is risk with that third line, but the potential is quite good. it's the 4th line and lack of depth that are problematic. I's difficult to reconcile going all in if Devin Shore is a regular in the lineup and Derek Ryan is playing centre. Unless Shore really impressed at camp, I think he's going to see very limited playing time. Ryan is much more effective playing RW and taking faceoffs on his strong side.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage