SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

dream remaining offseason

Créé par: VancLOSERCaSUCKS
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 20 juill. 2022
Publié: 20 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
While not everyone will agree, here are my thoughts on how the Canucks can improve with minor changes to their roster.

1.) Don't get me wrong, I've love JT Miller as a player and he's been way better than expected in Vancouver, but I honestly don't see him resigning after his contract is over (i.e. Gaudreau, an American, not wanting to stay in Canada). I believe Van & NYI had talks at the draft about JT so I could see them circling back on it. While the return may seem a tad low, I think it fits nucks other needs and for a player who doesn't really fit the timeline of the team, it's better than losing him for nothing. Mayfield could be a good partner for Quinn for the next couple years.

2.) Idk why so many Canuck fans love Tyler Myers, but I hope they realize that just cuz he's big, he isn't very good. He's a fine offensive dman but I think the Canucks have plenty of that with Hughes, OEL, and Rathbone coming up. I heard the Canucks were looking for a 2nd but i'll take a 3rd from CHI as they could use a RHD and it'll help them reach the cap floor for the next couple years (esp if Toews and/or Kane is dealt). I later made a trade similarly to what they did this past trade deadline flipping Hamonic for a 3rd then using it to get Dermott. This time I went for Matt Roy as LA has lots of up and coming RHD (Durzi, Spence). I could see the Canucks adding a late rd pick here too.

3.) Pearson has honestly been solid as a Canuck, but I hope they give Kuzemko and Hoglander more chances in the top 9 as there's a surplus of wingers on the team. Dickinson hasn't been a great fit in Van either but I could see a team like Anaheim taking a flyer on him to help with defense and mentor the kids.

4.) The FA signings I made was in hopes to helping out the PK and team defence in general. I could see Rodrigues commanding in the $4~$4.35 range and honestly, I would not mind giving him that contract if its a shorter term deal.

Let me know what y'all think and hope you give my thoughts a read before just disagreeing with everything lol.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
33 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Mayfield, Scott
  2. Räty, Aatu
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2025 (OTT)
4.
VAN
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (ANA)
ANA
  1. Dickinson, Jason
Détails additionnels:
I would honestly take anything for him
5.
LAK
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (CHI)
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYI
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de ANA
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2025
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de OTT
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $75 501 667 $1 250 000 $2 000 000 $6 998 333 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 750 000 $4 750 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 750 000 $3 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
825 000 $825 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Islanders de New York
1 450 000 $1 450 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 22
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 15,041
Mentions "j'aime": 12,102
Isles decline
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 25
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2020
Messages: 10,191
Mentions "j'aime": 9,412
Roy probably has more value than Myers right?
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 25
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 181
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: Db1899
Isles decline


enjoy mediocracy
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 27
#4
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 586
Myers and Pearson are worth well more than that. Rather keep them than give them away for that little.
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 27
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 181
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: mv21227
Roy probably has more value than Myers right?


Yeah but I could see LA having to move him due to so many RHD that can play. And I thought the same about Dermott and Hamonic so who knows tears of joy I wouldn't mind upgrading the pick to a 2nd or adding Dipietro, also that CHI 3rd would be a higher 3rd rd pick so
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 28
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 15,041
Mentions "j'aime": 12,102
Quoting: VancLOSERCaSUCKS
enjoy mediocracy


Ironic because that’s what this trade would lead to. Miller already peaked. Raty will make the isles out of camp this season, they aren’t trading a player with his upside for a player approaching 30.
Badgm91 et JMF13 a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 28
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2018
Messages: 831
Mentions "j'aime": 717
Pick a different team for Myers. Hawks right side has no spots. They aren’t investing picks for players over 30. They will have no issue reaching the cap floor next year. Hawks would be dumb to give up 66th overall for Myers. Roy is worth more than Myers.
klassic a aimé ceci.
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 30
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 181
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: westleysnipez
Myers and Pearson are worth well more than that. Rather keep them than give them away for that little.


To each their own. Myers sucks so I'd be happy with a 3rd for him. Pearson was traded for Gudbranson so, gotta give the kids/new guys a chance over him.
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 32
#9
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 181
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: Db1899
Ironic because that’s what this trade would lead to. Miller already peaked. Raty will make the isles out of camp this season, they aren’t trading a player with his upside for a player approaching 30.


I'd still do the trade if you remove Raty. Would prob take Holmstrom or any B-tier prospect instead.
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 33
#10
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 181
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: HiddenValley
Pick a different team for Myers. Hawks right side has no spots. They aren’t investing picks for players over 30. They will have no issue reaching the cap floor next year. Hawks would be dumb to give up 66th overall for Myers. Roy is worth more than Myers.


Hawk's have been making dumb moves all offseason. What are the odds the 3rd rd pick becomes a decent player anyways?
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 39
#11
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 586
Quoting: VancLOSERCaSUCKS
To each their own. Myers sucks so I'd be happy with a 3rd for him. Pearson was traded for Gudbranson so, gotta give the kids/new guys a chance over him.


Idk why you're being pessimistic about Myers. He just had a really good season and eats 22 minutes/night. Canucks aren't going to move him for less than a late 1st, and only after they have a replacement lined up.

Just because Pearson was traded for Gudbranson doesn't mean Pearson is somehow a worse player. Any team in the league would want a 40-point, defensively responsible winger. Yeah, the Canucks need to clear the bottleneck at forward, but Pearson is going to cost a team more than that.
20 juill. 2022 à 12 h 51
#12
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 181
Mentions "j'aime": 38
Quoting: westleysnipez
Idk why you're being pessimistic about Myers. He just had a really good season and eats 22 minutes/night. Canucks aren't going to move him for less than a late 1st, and only after they have a replacement lined up.

Just because Pearson was traded for Gudbranson doesn't mean Pearson is somehow a worse player. Any team in the league would want a 40-point, defensively responsible winger. Yeah, the Canucks need to clear the bottleneck at forward, but Pearson is going to cost a team more than that.


Really good season is quite the overstatement, he got better under Boudreau, sure I can get on board with that. But historically, he's been bad ever since he was traded from Buffalo. Idk how he deceives so many people. He is so god awful defensively. Led the team with turnovers in the defensive zone and on-ice goal (and expected goal) differential. If the nucks had a pure defensive defenseman to pair with him it could maybe work but unfortunately we don't.

If he can fetch more than a 3rd, then sure. But I'd part with him for at least that. The main idea is just moving him in general.
20 juill. 2022 à 13 h 46
#13
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 1,208
Mentions "j'aime": 1,490
Chicago says no. They are not trading assets for a player like Myers. They are just starting the tear down.
20 juill. 2022 à 13 h 56
#14
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,302
Mentions "j'aime": 4,479
Quoting: VancLOSERCaSUCKS
Hawk's have been making dumb moves all offseason. What are the odds the 3rd rd pick becomes a decent player anyways?


Not as high as a second round pick but still higher then you think.
Quoting: westleysnipez
Idk why you're being pessimistic about Myers. He just had a really good season and eats 22 minutes/night. Canucks aren't going to move him for less than a late 1st, and only after they have a replacement lined up.

Just because Pearson was traded for Gudbranson doesn't mean Pearson is somehow a worse player. Any team in the league would want a 40-point, defensively responsible winger. Yeah, the Canucks need to clear the bottleneck at forward, but Pearson is going to cost a team more than that.


Chicago would just be wasting a roster spot for someone who just slots in on the bottom pairing at best when we can use the empty slot for a young guy like Ian Mitchell or Alec Regula literally either one of them would be a better choice then Myers who hasn’t been good since 2018
20 juill. 2022 à 18 h 29
#15
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,368
Mentions "j'aime": 586
Quoting: IconicHawk
Chicago would just be wasting a roster spot for someone who just slots in on the bottom pairing at best when we can use the empty slot for a young guy like Ian Mitchell or Alec Regula literally either one of them would be a better choice then Myers who hasn’t been good since 2018


Yeah, I wasn't saying it would be a good option for Chicago, just that Myers is worth more.

If I was making a trade with the Hawks, I'd offer Myers, a Conditional 3rd, and a 5th (both 2023) for Murphy. Condition on Murphy playing at least 40 games, then the 3rd becomes a 2nd.
20 juill. 2022 à 18 h 48
#16
Bedard23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 9,302
Mentions "j'aime": 4,479
Quoting: westleysnipez
Yeah, I wasn't saying it would be a good option for Chicago, just that Myers is worth more.

If I was making a trade with the Hawks, I'd offer Myers, a Conditional 3rd, and a 5th (both 2023) for Murphy. Condition on Murphy playing at least 40 games, then the 3rd becomes a 2nd.


Still a no
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage