SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Fixing goaltending and secondary scoring

Créé par: BallPuckFellow10
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 10 juill. 2022
Publié: 10 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
- Out of all the goalie options for the Leafs out there, I believe this would be one of the lowest risk moves that could be made that still carries a high chance of success. Think Talbot is a phenomenal goaltender.

- D-core is pretty self explanatory. Pairings could be moved around. Rielly & Sandin will quarterback their own PP's while the remaining for will play on the PK.

- Adding Strome & Rodrigues would be two massive moves for the Leafs. They could really add some secondary scoring while giving Keefe immense flexibility in terms of line-combinations. Robertson should also be a full-time player now. I think this puts him in a good spot to succeed.

- Kämpf & Engvall are an exceptional duo that dominates when they are out together. I believe Anderson complements them well. Although he only had a cup of coffee in the NHL this season, his results in terms of driving play with those two were really good. He get's the nod over Simmonds for me to start the season.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
23 000 000 $
11 500 000 $
21 400 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
22 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
MIN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
CHI
    No qualifying offer.
    3.
    TOR
    1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2024 (DAL)
    DAL
    1. Holl, Justin
    Détails additionnels:
    Could be moved anywhere.
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2024
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de DAL
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2025
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2182 500 000 $81 756 450 $212 500 $0 $743 550 $

    Formation

    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
    C, AG
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
    AD
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    796 667 $796 667 $
    AG, AD
    RFA - 2
    3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Wild du Minnesota
    3 666 667 $3 666 667 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    5 625 000 $5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    750 000 $750 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    800 000 $800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
    900 000 $900 000 $
    AD, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    10 juill. 2022 à 13 h 50
    #1
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 2,766
    Mentions "j'aime": 520
    Unless Guerin changes his mind, Talbot isn't available to be traded . Minnesota would still be in position of needing a 1b, so no
    10 juill. 2022 à 13 h 56
    #2
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,143
    Mentions "j'aime": 471
    Quoting: Wildnochance
    Unless Guerin changes his mind, Talbot isn't available to be traded . Minnesota would still be in position of needing a 1b, so no


    Still think it makes sense for the Wild. The return is fair, and the cap-space created by the move can be used to sign a cheaper backup like Comrie, Holtby or Halak, while utilizing the remaining cap space to sign a good bottom 6 forward. Don't think it is a terrible move from the Wild's perspective. But we can obviously disagree on that.
    10 juill. 2022 à 13 h 58
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 5,684
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,887
    Strome thrives playing top line minutes with highly skilled star players. Signing him to play 3C with a couple average players is setting him up for failure.
    GMBL a aimé ceci.
    10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 9
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2022
    Messages: 8,621
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,333
    Quoting: SociallyHawkward
    Strome thrives playing top line minutes with highly skilled star players. Signing him to play 3C with a couple average players is setting him up for failure.


    They should try him with Marner and see if they can rekindle old chemistry, if Bunting-Matthews-Nylander works if not can see if not then try Bunting-Tavares-Nylander. If that fails then Strome-Tavares-Nylander.
    BallPuckFellow10 a aimé ceci.
    10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 14
    #5
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,143
    Mentions "j'aime": 471
    Quoting: SociallyHawkward
    Strome thrives playing top line minutes with highly skilled star players. Signing him to play 3C with a couple average players is setting him up for failure.


    Kerfoot - Tavares - Nylander
    Robertson - Strome - Rodrigues

    Tavares - Strome - Nylander
    Robertson - Kerfoot - Rodrigues

    Kerfoot - Tavares - Rodrigues
    Robertson - Strome - Nylander

    Robertson - Tavares - Rodrigues
    Kerfoot - Strome - Nylander

    Don't really get your point at all. There are so many possibilities with him in the lineup. Haven't even moved around Marner or Bunting here either.
    10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 15
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,143
    Mentions "j'aime": 471
    Quoting: GMBL
    They should try him with Marner and see if they can rekindle old chemistry, if Bunting-Matthews-Nylander works if not can see if not then try Bunting-Tavares-Nylander. If that fails then Strome-Tavares-Nylander.


    You can create endless combinations to try to make it work. It is a good ''problem'' to have.
    10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 20
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 5,684
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,887
    Quoting: BallPuckFellow10
    Kerfoot - Tavares - Nylander
    Robertson - Strome - Rodrigues

    Tavares - Strome - Nylander
    Robertson - Kerfoot - Rodrigues

    Kerfoot - Tavares - Rodrigues
    Robertson - Strome - Nylander

    Robertson - Tavares - Rodrigues
    Kerfoot - Strome - Nylander

    Don't really get your point at all. There are so many possibilities with him in the lineup. Haven't even moved around Marner or Bunting here either.


    Strome can't play wing either. He's a terrible winger. I guess if you want to do Tavares - strome - Nylander that might work but strome and Tavares are both really slow.
    10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 22
    #8
    Banni
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: déc. 2020
    Messages: 2,766
    Mentions "j'aime": 520
    Quoting: BallPuckFellow10
    Still think it makes sense for the Wild. The return is fair, and the cap-space created by the move can be used to sign a cheaper backup like Comrie, Holtby or Halak, while utilizing the remaining cap space to sign a good bottom 6 forward. Don't think it is a terrible move from the Wild's perspective. But we can obviously disagree on that.


    I mean Minnesota doesn't need a bottom 6 forward. They have plenty of those. Holtby retired. Halak is no longer reliable.
    Minnesota tried that with Talbot and Kaapo kahkonen and it didn't work. Trading Talbot would make Minnesota need another G.
    10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 22
    #9
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 5,684
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,887
    Quoting: BallPuckFellow10
    You can create endless combinations to try to make it work. It is a good ''problem'' to have.


    Hawks tried. Only thing that worked was putting him in the middle of Debrincat and Kane. So yeah if you want strome as your 1C with matthews and marner on his wings it should work fine. But I don't see that happening
    10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 24
    #10
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,143
    Mentions "j'aime": 471
    Quoting: SociallyHawkward
    Strome can't play wing either. He's a terrible winger. I guess if you want to do Tavares - strome - Nylander that might work but strome and Tavares are both really slow.


    Strome & Tavares can be surrounded by the likes of Bunting, Marner, Nylander, Kerfoot, Rodrigues & Robertson, all players that can move their feet that can compensate for their lack of foot-speed.
    10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 27
    #11
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2019
    Messages: 5,684
    Mentions "j'aime": 5,887
    Quoting: BallPuckFellow10
    Strome & Tavares can be surrounded by the likes of Bunting, Marner, Nylander, Kerfoot, Rodrigues & Robertson, all players that can move their feet that can compensate for their lack of foot-speed.


    I'm just saying you don't want strome and Tavares on a line together. But strome needs superstar players so that leaves only matthews and marner. And it'd mean moving matthews to wing. It's just not a fit.
    10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 29
    #12
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: août 2020
    Messages: 1,143
    Mentions "j'aime": 471
    Quoting: Wildnochance
    I mean Minnesota doesn't need a bottom 6 forward. They have plenty of those. Holtby retired. Halak is no longer reliable.
    Minnesota tried that with Talbot and Kaapo kahkonen and it didn't work. Trading Talbot would make Minnesota need another G.


    You are right, they don't need anything. It would be Toronto needing the move more than Minnesota in this case. I think the 2nd round draft pick reflects that. But I can definitely see where you are coming from.
    10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 50
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2022
    Messages: 8,621
    Mentions "j'aime": 3,333
    Quoting: SociallyHawkward
    I'm just saying you don't want strome and Tavares on a line together. But strome needs superstar players so that leaves only matthews and marner. And it'd mean moving matthews to wing. It's just not a fit.


    There's Nylander, they can move them both to the 3rd line with Kampf perhaps but yeah, if he's slow probably wouldnt work well with Tavares. Sounds like it's something they should only try for a year then.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage