PARAMÈTRES D’AFFICHAGE
Basculer en mode sombre
Thème automatique
COTES DES PARIS
Cotes activées
LANGUE
EN
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
FORUMS
ARCHIVES ▾
ARCHIVES
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
CBA ▾
CBA
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
COTES
DÉPISTAGE
CALCS ▾
CALCS
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
Historique des blessures
OUTILS ▾
OUTILS
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Équipes affiliées
Essais professionnels
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
JOUEURS ▾
JOUEURS
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
ÉQUIPES ▾
CONFÉRENCE DE L'OUEST
PACIFIQUE
Ducks d'Anaheim
Flames de Calgary
Oilers d'Edmonton
Kings de Los Angeles
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
CENTRALE
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Stars de Dallas
Wild du Minnesota
Predators de Nashville
Blues de St-Louis
Jets de Winnipeg
CONFÉRENCE DE L'EST
MÉTROPOLITAINE
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Capitals de Washington
ATLANTIQUE
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Red Wings de Detroit
Panthers de la Floride
Canadiens de Montréal
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
INTERACTIF ▾
OUTILS INTERACTIFS
Fauteuil - DG (Simulateur de formation personnalisée)
Repêchage simulé
Simulateur de transactions (propositions de transactions)
RECHERCHER
FAUTEUIL - DG
REPÊCHAGE SIMULÉ
SIMULATEUR DE TRANSACTIONS
ÉQUIPES ▾
Ducks d'Anaheim
Coyotes de l'Arizona
Bruins de Boston
Sabres de Buffalo
Flames de Calgary
Hurricanes de la Caroline
Blackhawks de Chicago
Avalanche du Colorado
Blue Jackets de Columbus
Stars de Dallas
Red Wings de Detroit
Oilers d'Edmonton
Panthers de la Floride
Kings de Los Angeles
Wild du Minnesota
Canadiens de Montréal
Predators de Nashville
Devils du New Jersey
Islanders de New York
Rangers de New York
Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Flyers de Philadelphie
Penguins de Pittsburgh
Sharks de San Jose
Kraken de Seattle
Blues de St-Louis
Lightning de Tampa Bay
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Canucks de Vancouver
Golden Knights de Vegas
Capitals de Washington
Jets de Winnipeg
JOUEURS ▾
Joueurs autonomes
Joueurs actifs
Joueurs inactifs
Contrats 35 ans et +
Contrats d’entrée
Reports du contrat d'entrée
NTC-NMC
Gains en carrière
Rapports de dépistage
Coût par point
Coût par arrêt
Transactions
Signatures
Mouvements de personnel
Historique des blessures
Historique du ballottage
Salaire retenu
Historique des rachats de contrat
Comparables de contrats
Essais professionnels
OUTILS ▾
Tableau de repêchage
Comparables de contrats
Rapports de dépistage
Cas d’arbitrage
Essais professionnels
Entraîneurs
Directeurs généraux
Joueurs appartenant à la formation au moment du gel - COVID
Joueurs - Liste de réserve
(Premium)
Suivi des dépenses salariales
(Premium)
Clauses d'échange entrant en vigueur
(Premium)
Équipes affiliées
OUTILS - FANTASY HOCKEY ▾
Sommaire
Alignements détaillés
Gardiens partants
Mises à jour - Statuts des joueurs
CALCS ▾
Calculateur de rachat de contrat
Calculateur de ballottage
Calculateur d’offre qualificative
Calculateur d’arbitrage
Calculateur d'offre hostile
Calculateur d'impôt sur le revenu
RAPPORTS DE DÉPISTAGE
COTES
CBA▾
FAQ - Convention collective
FAQ - Rapports de dépistage
Historique des masses salariales
Rémunération maximale du contrat d’entrée
FAQ - Rachats de contrat
FAQ - Liste des blessés à long terme
FAQ - Offre Hostile
FAQ - Ballottage
FAQ - Liste de réserve
FAQ - Repêchage d'expansion
ARCHIVES ▾
Masses salariales des années antérieures
(Premium)
Articles
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2017 - Vegas
Simulateur de repêchage d'expansion de 2021 - Seattle
FORUMS
SE CONNECTER
S'INSCRIRE
EN
Basculer en mode sombre
Cotes activées
BallPuckFellow10
Membre depuis
28 août 2020
Équipe favorite
Maple Leafs de Toronto
Messages dans les forums
1143
Messages par jour
0.9
MESSAGES
SUJETS
MENTIONS "J'AIME"
ÉQUIPES VIA FAUTEUIL-DG
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 juill. 2022 à 14 h 8
Sujet:
Would you be happy with this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NR1203</b></div><div>This seems like the way it's headed and that isn't necessarily an awful thing. I think Sonny Milano is worth a shot instead of ZAR, he proved last season he thrives as a complement to higher-scoring players so I feel like he could be a fit with Tavares and Nylander.</div></div>
Milano did have a good season for sure. Could see him complement JT & Willy. Problem is what you do with Robertson then. Don't think playing on the 4th line will be good for his development or confidence. Maybe trade bait then?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
18 juill. 2022 à 13 h 44
Sujet:
Would you be happy with this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ernie</b></div><div>Looks possible i like it but ZAR will be closer to 2 mill and want two years minimum IMO</div></div>
Honestly don't know what the FA's will get. I have seen some take way below what I expected and others more. Figured the 1 year deal on lower AAV would be what the Leafs could offer ZAR and he might be interested in taking that if he prioritizes to be on a contending team. Can obviously get more elsewhere with more term, but situation might not be as good.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2022 à 20 h 53
Sujet:
Would be happy with this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>chefed</b></div><div>I do not see Muzzin being traded unless an asset is coming back .Look at what is left 2 almost rookies Holl a 39 year old .Add to the fact the Leafs have already paid half of his salary. .I do see him moved to clear cap for a larger deal then I could see giving up an asset. McD 33 yrs old 6.75 x4 was traded by Tampa for an asset. That was a cap dump .Reese for 1 m is wishful thinking 1.5 more likely Sandin will want Boqvist numbers 2.6 m if he is going to sign for 3 years .We have several players on the bubble who can play in Kerfoot's spot Robertson Holmberg come to mind Defense/Goal is still the teams weak spot .</div></div>
Difference is that Tampa got a deal with a team that wanted McDonagh. Nashville clearly think they were that defenseman piece away from seriously contending. Extending Forsberg for 8 years clearly proves that.
In this scenario, the Leafs haven't yet found another contender that is willing to move assets for Muzzin. The Leafs have to move someone as they only can field a 20 man roster with Sandin unsigned. Leafs have no leverage now either which takes away their bargaining power. Although Muzzin isn't a negative value asset, they will have to do something to make this deal worthwhile for the Ducks. They could easily add his cap hit from players in FA without giving up assets. This is why the trade is setup like it is.
Obviously other combinations of player trades could take place. Kerfoot + Holl is a very viable package deal the Leafs could make to a team or just trade them separately.
As for ZAR, have seen a bunch of FA's take well below what I expected them to take. $1M or $1.5M, doesn't really matter. If you noticed, I left some cap maneuverability.
I took the Boqvist contract into consideration here. He has had a more productive NHL career so far in comparison to Sandin. That is why I gave Sandin $2.3M rather than $2.6M like Boqvist.
Holmberg could use some seasoning in the AHL while Robertson would have to earn a spot in camp. Very unfortunate situation for him, but the Leafs cant afford to gamble on him being a productive member in the top 6 and trade a versatile Swiss army knife like Kerfoot away without knowing for certain that Robertson is ready.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2022 à 20 h 13
Sujet:
Would be happy with this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>gmurrayt</b></div><div>Muzzin has a full NTC, what if he decides he wants to stay in Toronto. What incentive does he have to move?</div></div>
This is obviously a scenario that he does waive his NTC.
There are no guarantees he will waive it for anybody. Can come up with pros and cons for pretty much every franchise. This is strictly hypothetical if he'd be interested into going back to California.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2022 à 19 h 34
Sujet:
Would be happy with this
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Nighthawk</b></div><div>A late 1st for an early 2nd in a good draft isn’t enough imo. A later pick from the Ducks maybe they consider it. That said they probably are in semi tank mode & say no.</div></div>
Fair enough.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2022 à 18 h 32
Sujet:
Muzzin Waives for Sunny Southern California
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MatthewsFan</b></div><div>Lol no more arguments, you win so this can be over. Muzzin for picks makes total sense</div></div>
It is not about ''winning'' lol. Just thinking a little bit critically.
You are not wrong in Muzzin having value, he does. He is not a scrub. He is also a good vet that would be good for the younger players, no doubt. But Anaheim can find other players that can be ''good vets'' that aren't on 2 year deals. It is just how the market works.
For a team that is a contender and wants Muzzin's services, Toronto can ask for assets back. In this case it would with 99% certainty be the Leafs calling Anaheim to make a deal, not the other way around. The Ducks have all the leverage.
Is it completely unrealistic that the Leafs get a roster player back from Anaheim? Of course not. I just don't think there are too many players on Anaheims roster that the Leafs would be interested in & the Ducks willing to part with.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2022 à 18 h 22
Sujet:
Muzzin Waives for Sunny Southern California
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MatthewsFan</b></div><div>Does a team make this deal if they want to finish at the bottom?
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Ryan Strome signs a five-year contract in Anaheim.</p>— Chris Johnston (<a href="/users/reporterchris" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">@reporterchris</a>) <a href="https://twitter.com/reporterchris/status/1547387623546781696?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">July 14, 2022</a></blockquote>
This was a team that was in the playoff race till late in the season last year. Adding a vet like Muzzin to provide some leadership and toughness to young group could be really good</div></div>
Obviously.
Firstly, Strome doesn't move the needle that much, he essentially replaces Getzlaf.
Secondly, without doing that move they would be $16M under the cap floor. They needed to add some dollars from free agency.
Your next argument is probably going to be, adding Muzzin's $5.625M will help them get closer to the floor. That is true. But there are probably 25 other teams in the league that likely wants to move a contract which means that Anaheim still has all the leverage in a potential deal that see's them taking on a significant cap-hit. Why should they chose to ''help'' the Leafs when they can play all the teams against each other in order to receive the best possible package?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2022 à 18 h 9
Sujet:
Muzzin Waives for Sunny Southern California
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MatthewsFan</b></div><div>I am very happy to agree to disagree and just go back to my original post. IMO (which could be dead wrong) IF Muzzin were to agree to a trade and was willing to go to ANA, it is my believe Kyle would not simply Judy trade him for a puck swap. He has value and would want something coming back in the form of a roster player with upside. And if</div></div>
You can't count anything out.
But, what would be the incentive for Anaheim to take on Muzzin? They are most likely a team that will want to finish as close to the bottom as possible in order to have a chance at a top pick. Does adding Muzzin help them achieve this goal? Personally don't think so. Logically you'd think they'd want a sweetener to take Muzzin on-board.
On a side note, I also think Anaheim could be a player as a third party in a three-way trade. If the Leafs find a hockey trade with a contender, Anaheim can use their cap-space to help both teams get what they want.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2022 à 17 h 56
Sujet:
Muzzin Waives for Sunny Southern California
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MatthewsFan</b></div><div>I will call it now so we can come back to this, IF Muzzin is traded, it will be a hockey deal. A roster player, most likely a fwd, will be coming back.
Not just picks</div></div>
I am not saying that Muzzin won't be traded in a hockey deal. It is very possible that he will. I have no clue what Dubas is planning. But in this specific scenario from the OP, Muzzin is a cap dump, and I understand why he set it up that way if you think logically what the needs are for both hockey clubs.
Anaheim can trade with 30 other teams or sign FA's to reach the floor, they essentially have no direct need for Muzzin. We have a direct need to free up some cap-space.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2022 à 17 h 46
Sujet:
Muzzin Waives for Sunny Southern California
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MatthewsFan</b></div><div>“Hope that makes sense”
Mrazek was a cap dump.
Muzzin absolutely still has value. Yes, his injury his is absolutely a concern but came back healthy for the playoffs and played extremely well with Brodie.
Muzzin would not be a cap dump, he still has value.
I absolutely believe they would not be interested in just having cap space should they move him. This trade does not make sense in comparison to the Mrazek deal.
Muzzin has value 🤷♂️</div></div>
Exactly, hope that made sense, lol.
Muzzin wouldn't be a cap dump then? We can currently only fit a 20 man roster under the cap. So we need to move someone in order to have a bigger roster and sign Sandin. Hence why moving Muzzin would be a cap-dump.
Does Muzzin have value? Absolutely, but Anaheim doesn't need to make the trade, we do. In this deal we have no leverage, Anaheim does. It is common sense really.
We could look at other options like moving Kerfoot + Holl or something even bigger.
What is crystal clear is that moving Muzzin is a cap-dump because we need the space to resign players and have a full roster. It is not a hockey trade that makes us a better team.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2022 à 17 h 31
Sujet:
Muzzin Waives for Sunny Southern California
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MatthewsFan</b></div><div>Thanks captain obvious, where did I say I didn’t get.
I said, I don’t believe this is what the Leafs would do.
Learn how to read</div></div>
Where did I say that you didn't get it? I just explained why it made sense.
Learn how to read.
Jokes aside, Anaheim maybe squeezes us a little harder because we don't have the same leverage now as we did at the draft.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
17 juill. 2022 à 17 h 23
Sujet:
Muzzin Waives for Sunny Southern California
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MatthewsFan</b></div><div>IMO if Muzzin does waive, ANA makes a ton on sense with the lack of vet LD right now.
Not going to comment on the return, I don’t believe it will be this tho</div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>NR1</b></div><div>I think muzzin could wavie but, I wouldn't send in a 1st to get rid of him. I'd do a 3rd and a 5th and possibly a 7th. then just get the second or 3rd in return</div></div>
View it as Anaheim moving up a few spots in the draft to take on Muzzin's contract and us just sliding down a couple of spots. It says in the description ''Trade a la the Mrazek transaction.'' If we are a playoff team that hopefully moves past the 1st round, our pick is somewhere in the 24-32 range. Anaheim are most likely going to pick in the top 5, so we would move down from let's say 25 to 37 in the draft to dump his contract.
Hope that makes sense to you guys.
The return makes sense in terms of compensation too. Yes Muzzin's cap hit is higher than Mrazek, but he is actually owed less in real dollars ($6M vs $8.6M).
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 juill. 2022 à 18 h 48
Sujet:
Trading for Tavares
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Shibbal18</b></div><div>Toronto thanks Minnesota</div></div>
lol.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
15 juill. 2022 à 12 h 22
Sujet:
R-E-L-A-X - Read Desc
Couldn't agree more with you. People need to calm down. Was thinking about making a post like this myself.
Everybody is freaking out about goaltending, last season our save % as a team was .900 flat. We added Murray .906 & Samsonov .896. We are pretty much in the exact same spot there.
We still have to figure out what we are going to do on D. We can afford to move one player and get some assets back or trade for a different defenseman or forward. We have flexibility there.
NAK is a very good add to the bottom 6. Think he plays on a line with 47 & 64. Gaudette & Malgin are depth adds. They likely compete for one spot on the 4th line. Joey Anderson is right there too. Simmonds maybe takes a step back and becomes 13th forward. We still have room for a couple of extra adds from FA to increase the competition. Abruzzese & Steeves could surprise and take a spot, wouldn't count them out, but not factor them in as guaranteed 4th liners.
Leaves us with Robertson. Do you give him a look with 91 & 88? Don't think he is suited to the shutdown role 47 & 64 play, so it would have to be 4th line minutes otherwise. Maybe trade bait with Kerfoot + Holl for upgrade at 2LW. Would look at guys like J.T. Miller, Yanni Gourde, Mangiapane & Necas. A few of them might be too expensive, but that is my thought process.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juill. 2022 à 16 h 29
Sujet:
Yanni Gourde
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>I don't disagree with 99% of your analysis. My point is the one <strong>you</strong> make in this construction: with 21 players on the roster and only a New-York-steak-dinner-for-four's cost below the ceiling, Toronto is in need of all the cap relief every transaction can give them.</div></div>
I see where you are coming from and the way to mitigate that would be to probably give Sandin & Engvall one year deals at a lower cap hit so that you at least could get a 22nd player in.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juill. 2022 à 16 h 7
Sujet:
Yanni Gourde
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>OldNYIfan</b></div><div>It seems to me that Seattle is giving up a perfectly good (although overpriced) third-line center who has three years on his contract for an equivalent third-line center with one year on his contract plus a third-pairing defenseman with one year on his contract who would play behind Adam Larsson and Justin Schultz. Moreover, Toronto gets no cap relief and loses a roster slot. Seems like a lose-lose to me.</div></div>
Personally think you'd have to add a sweater to the deal for Seattle to accept. Don't think Kerfoot + Holl is enough.
Why are Toronto in need for cap relief in this move? I am trading for Gourde, not dumping Kerfoot & Holl. I believe Gourde to be a better player than Kerfoot with more offensive upside & just better game in general. Also has the experience winning with Tampa that never hurts. Think he 100% is worth his contract and could provide the Leafs with some immense value. He can either play 2LW or 2C depending on what the coach wants. He is an all situation type guy as well which is useful. Moving Holl also opens a spot for Sandin to play regularly.
Seattle now have 2 young C studs that will play in the top 9 plus Wennberg. Geekie can be the 4C. Kerfoot is a versatile middle 6 option that only is owed $750k in real dollars this season. If Seattle aren't a playoff team, you can deal that at the TDL for some nice picks. Same goes for Holl. A 3rd pairing defenseman that has experience playing 20 minutes a night can be dealt at the TDL for picks too. I believe the return for Kerfoot & Holl at the TDL plus the sweetener from the original deal would be a greater haul for Seattle than what they could get for Gourde alone from someone else.
Obviously welcome to disagree.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
14 juill. 2022 à 15 h 5
Sujet:
Yanni Gourde
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Britishbulldog</b></div><div>For a 5'9" 20 goal scoring 31 year old making over $5 MIL I would consider that trade if Seattle included our 2 picks.
Gourde for Kerfoot and Ott 3rd pick
Robertson and Holl for Leafs 2nd Pick 2023 and Leafs 3rd pick 2024</div></div>
Just edited the trade.
Going by your suggestion:
Kerfoot + 3rd for Gourde.
Holl + Robertson for 2nd + 3rd.
Might as well remove Robertson & 2nd from Seattle's side. The 3rd from both sides cancel each other out so in the end you have:
Kerfoot + Holl for Gourde.
Thoughts?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 46
Sujet:
Leafs with Matt Murray and Evgeni Malkin
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sowsysauce</b></div><div>Okay okay you're right. I moved Malkin to 2C, Kerfoot to 3C, and Tavares to the wing.
Now what? do your worst.</div></div>
Interesting idea, don't think Malkin signs that anyways.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2022 à 18 h 32
Sujet:
Leafs with Matt Murray and Evgeni Malkin
Malkin coming to Toronto to play 3C... I have seen it all now.
Cheers for the laugh.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2022 à 11 h 43
Sujet:
Murray three-way trade and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>Hes old, injury prone and has a big cap hit for multiple years. If anyone gives up anything to help the leafs cap issue and dman log jam they should be ashamed of themselves</div></div>
You are only viewing from the perspective of ''helping the Leafs,'' not how it helps Detroit as well.
Again, not saying that the deal is a slam-dunk by any means.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2022 à 10 h 24
Sujet:
Murray three-way trade and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>buffbry</b></div><div>Wings pass, leafs pay us to take muzzin not other way around</div></div>
I disagree, don't think Muzzin has negative value. Can understand if the Wings aren't interested in the deal, but value-wise I think it is fair.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2022 à 10 h 15
Sujet:
Perfect Offseason with Kane
Committing 7 years x $7M to a soon to be 31 year old forward cannot be viewed as perfect in my book.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2022 à 10 h 13
Sujet:
Murray three-way trade and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mmccRed198913</b></div><div>Red Wings do not want Muzzin. They need someone who can play with Seider. Last year that was 1/2 of Dekeyser, Leddy (who was not great) and Osterle. Stevie Y will not make the same mistake</div></div>
You might be right. I am just speculating obviously, but believe the fit is there. He is also a superior defenseman in comparison to DeKeyser, Leddy & Oesterle.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
11 juill. 2022 à 9 h 55
Sujet:
Murray three-way trade and more
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Chopper02</b></div><div>Pretty sure Edmonton wants a player that can play now and not a pick. Plus a late 2nd rounder wouldn't get it done for Puljujarvi. It is fascinating how Toronto wants Murray though.</div></div>
You are probably right in Edmonton wanting a player for now. What the Leafs can offer is the 2nd and potentially another pick for Puljujärvi & then Edmonton using those assets to get a F.
Murray seems like such a risk to me.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
10 juill. 2022 à 14 h 29
Sujet:
Fixing goaltending and secondary scoring
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Wildnochance</b></div><div>I mean Minnesota doesn't need a bottom 6 forward. They have plenty of those. Holtby retired. Halak is no longer reliable.
Minnesota tried that with Talbot and Kaapo kahkonen and it didn't work. Trading Talbot would make Minnesota need another G.</div></div>
You are right, they don't need anything. It would be Toronto needing the move more than Minnesota in this case. I think the 2nd round draft pick reflects that. But I can definitely see where you are coming from.
1
2
Suivant
Page 1
Remerciements à
Guillaume Lambert-Héon
pour l'aide à la traduction de l'anglais au français
SalarySwish
| Masses salariales de la NBA par CapFriendly
Conditions d’utilisation
Politique de confidentialité
Règlements du forum
À propos de nous
FAQ - Convention collective
Nous contacter
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com