SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Genius Moves

Créé par: TheGeniusGM
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 8 juill. 2022
Publié: 9 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Relieving cap, added a deeper bottom six while maintaining a similar d-core.

Gio is arguably better than muzzin at 1/5 of his price and less injury prone. Sandin deserves a bridge deal.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
21 400 000 $
22 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
31 500 000 $
21 600 000 $
34 000 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Crouse, Lawson [Droits de RFA]
ARI
  1. Holl, Justin
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
2.
ANA
  1. Muzzin, Jake
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2023 (TOR)
  3. Choix de 5e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2025
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2182 500 000 $82 268 116 $212 500 $0 $231 884 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, C, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
750 000 $750 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
1 600 000 $1 600 000 $
DD
UFA
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 400 000 $1 400 000 $
DG
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
9 juill. 2022 à 1 h 28
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,846
Mentions "j'aime": 1,875
Ducks decline. Muzzin isn’t of value for ANA. Make it Sandin instead and that should be ballpark
TJClutch, TheGeniusGM, christ30 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2022 à 1 h 40
#2
Démarrer sujet
GeniusGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: Jded
Ducks decline. Muzzin isn’t of value for ANA. Make it Sandin instead and that should be ballpark


I think he is still a useful dman on a fair contract. Wouldn't be the worst deal for the ducks alongside the picks. We all know gibson is being shown around the league too right.
9 juill. 2022 à 1 h 44
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 27
Mentions "j'aime": 14
As much as I actually like this team, like jded said, ducks easily decline that trade. Wouldn't give away Sandin tho. Just keep Campbell at that point. Costs less and younger. Also wouldn't sign PK. ARI prob declines too. Would prob have to give up a 2nd + 3rd. Keep the extra money from keeping Campbell instead of Gibson and PK or possibly use that for another depth piece, whether a 3rd or 4th line depth piece or a 3rd pairing dman.
Britishbulldog, Jded, HeroStuff and 3 others a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2022 à 1 h 53
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,774
Mentions "j'aime": 7,384
How is trading for arguably the worst starter in the league over the past 3 years a genius move?
Britishbulldog et HeroStuff a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2022 à 2 h 4
#5
C,mon Leafs...Please
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 838
Mentions "j'aime": 329
Quoting: TJClutch
As much as I actually like this team, like jded said, ducks easily decline that trade.
- Wouldn't give away Sandin tho.
- Just keep Campbell at that point. Costs less and younger.
- Also wouldn't sign PK.
- ARI prob declines too.
- Would prob have to give up a 2nd + 3rd. Keep the extra money from keeping Campbell instead of Gibson and PK or possibly use that for another depth piece, whether a 3rd or 4th line depth piece or a 3rd pairing dman.


I agree with all those points 100%
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2022 à 2 h 10
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
How is trading for arguably the worst starter in the league over the past 3 years a genius move?


Everyone keeps liking him cause they think he's bounceback candidate, if he flops with Toronto his contract would be impossible to move.
Britishbulldog a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2022 à 2 h 10
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,846
Mentions "j'aime": 1,875
Quoting: TheGeniusGM
I think he is still a useful dman on a fair contract. Wouldn't be the worst deal for the ducks alongside the picks. We all know gibson is being shown around the league too right.


He’s totally a useful defenseman on a contract that isn’t unreasonable. He’s also 33 and on a 2 year contract. ANA won’t be competing in either of those two years, so a player that will 100% be gone by the time they’re competing is not an asset to ANA at all. Rebuilding teams don’t trade future assets for short term veterans.
9 juill. 2022 à 2 h 15
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 19,774
Mentions "j'aime": 7,384
Quoting: HeroStuff
Everyone keeps liking him cause they think he's bounceback candidate, if he flops with Toronto his contract would be impossible to move.


Yeah, bounce backs are only worth it if you can get em cheap, and gibson is expensive as hell in every way
HeroStuff et Britishbulldog a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2022 à 2 h 19
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,846
Mentions "j'aime": 1,875
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
How is trading for arguably the worst starter in the league over the past 3 years a genius move?


Because he has star talent (literally been an all-star three times). If you judge a goalie by blindly looking at their save % then sure, he dropped off the last three years, which totally coincidentally aligns to when the ducks team went to crap and stopped playing competent hockey. Watch the ducks play and you’ll see it’s impossible for any goalie to sit back there and manage a .920 save % for a good sample size. It was crazy that Stolarz managed it at the sample he did, but if he played the sample Gibson did it would have been the same or worse. GMs will be smart enough to value him. If they don’t offer enough value, the ducks will happily keep him
OldNYIfan et TheGeniusGM a aimé ceci.
9 juill. 2022 à 2 h 37
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2022
Messages: 41
Mentions "j'aime": 17
Quoting: Jded
Because he has star talent (literally been an all-star three times). If you judge a goalie by blindly looking at their save % then sure, he dropped off the last three years, which totally coincidentally aligns to when the ducks team went to crap and stopped playing competent hockey. Watch the ducks play and you’ll see it’s impossible for any goalie to sit back there and manage a .920 save % for a good sample size. It was crazy that Stolarz managed it at the sample he did, but if he played the sample Gibson did it would have been the same or worse. GMs will be smart enough to value him. If they don’t offer enough value, the ducks will happily keep him


To be fair he has had a negative GSAA according to href for the last 3 seasons, and same thing with money pucks Goals Saved above expected.

So there definitely a very risky choice to hope for a rebound for a new team.

I don't watch the ducks his bad is their D and defensive structure?
9 juill. 2022 à 3 h 10
#11
ChrisT30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 59
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Sadin may sign a bridge but aav still will be higher than lilys
9 juill. 2022 à 11 h 15
#12
Démarrer sujet
GeniusGM
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 71
Mentions "j'aime": 10
Quoting: christ30
Sadin may sign a bridge but aav still will be higher than lilys


I disagree, and if it is, it will be not much higher. They are valued the same and it's bad for team morale to pay more to a dman in the same role.
9 juill. 2022 à 19 h 17
#13
ChrisT30
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2018
Messages: 59
Mentions "j'aime": 3
Quoting: TheGeniusGM
I disagree, and if it is, it will be not much higher. They are valued the same and it's bad for team morale to pay more to a dman in the same role.

Then why hasn’t the deal been done
9 juill. 2022 à 23 h 27
#14
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 2,846
Mentions "j'aime": 1,875
Modifié 9 juill. 2022 à 23 h 32
Quoting: HeroStuff
To be fair he has had a negative GSAA according to href for the last 3 seasons, and same thing with money pucks Goals Saved above expected.

So there definitely a very risky choice to hope for a rebound for a new team.

I don't watch the ducks his bad is their D and defensive structure?


I hear you and totally get why a fan would be concerned because his stats haven’t shined lately. He’s not a different goalie though, the ducks everything has just been garbage. Their structure offensively, defensively, everything. They give up a ridiculous shot volume and generate very few themselves. Have to be bottom 10 for both those metrics. With how little offensive pressure the ducks get, it really leaves the goalie out to dry to because other teams spend so much time in our zone

Gibby started this past year great btw. He had a .917, was 3rd in saves and 4th in starts at the All star game in Jan. Then the ducks moved all of their vets and he plummeted in front of a glorified AHL defense
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage