SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Garland Trade

Créé par: bdb
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2022
Publié: 7 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This assumes Allvin doesn't get a trade he likes for Miller and decides to either continue to work towards re signing him or trading at the deadline.
Hurts to lose Garland and Rathbone but both are areas of depth and this would clear significant cap while keeping a competitive team and gaining some long term assets in the 12OA and Peeke.

Columbus apparently are looking for cost controlled players and might be willing to move their 12 pick to do so.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 025 000 $
2900 000 $
Transactions
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $72 639 167 $1 250 000 $2 000 000 $9 860 833 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 650 000 $6 650 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
950 000 $950 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance300 000 $$300K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 025 000 $1 025 000 $
C, AG
UFA
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
900 000 $900 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
787 500 $787 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 juill. 2022 à 8 h 7
#1
Dolzhenkov Is Coming
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 3,781
Mentions "j'aime": 5,520
Not a logical trade for Columbus. Canucks fans should really be looking elsewhere for RD. The CBJ don't have a surplus so them trading away any of the 3 NHL capable RD or the one they have in development doesn't make sense. They also have an abundance of LD prospects behind two very solid LD in Werenski and Gavrikov. Acquiring more LD prospects is not a logical move either.
Friendly_Cannon, Viqsi et Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2022 à 8 h 13
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2019
Messages: 4,216
Mentions "j'aime": 3,703
Jackets decline as we have a surplus of wingers and a shortage of right shot defenseman and high end players like pick 12 has a chance of generating.
dk325, Viqsi et Ajp_18 a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2022 à 8 h 33
#3
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Quoting: The_Cannon
Jackets decline as we have a surplus of wingers and a shortage of right shot defenseman and high end players like pick 12 has a chance of generating.


Fair enough, for some reason, I was thinking the team was stacked on RD.
7 juill. 2022 à 9 h 14
#4
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 7,256
Mentions "j'aime": 3,684
Quoting: bdb
Fair enough, for some reason, I was thinking the team was stacked on RD.

...I'm really curious as to where this impression came from. If we can isolate and diagnose this, we might be able to help a lot of people.

For the record, while I really like Garland and wish we could add him, the extreme surplus of forwards we have means he has to be classified as a "really nice to have", and so we can't afford to significantly weaken an already fragile position in pursuit of him.
Ajp_18, bdb, dk325 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2022 à 13 h 4
#5
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 357
Mentions "j'aime": 56
Quoting: Viqsi
...I'm really curious as to where this impression came from. If we can isolate and diagnose this, we might be able to help a lot of people.

For the record, while I really like Garland and wish we could add him, the extreme surplus of forwards we have means he has to be classified as a "really nice to have", and so we can't afford to significantly weaken an already fragile position in pursuit of him.


in my head the RD's were Gavrikov, Bean, Boqvist and Peeke with Bean playing his offside. I just didn't check, just one season removed from having Jones and Savard as well likely adds to the impression.
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
7 juill. 2022 à 14 h 9
#6
mostly harmless
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2016
Messages: 7,256
Mentions "j'aime": 3,684
Quoting: bdb
in my head the RD's were Gavrikov, Bean, Boqvist and Peeke with Bean playing his offside. I just didn't check, just one season removed from having Jones and Savard as well likely adds to the impression.

I think in the future I may point out that big loss, then. Because that's fair - we did previously have very solid RD depth, and other folks may well have just not quite put two and two together like that.

(And G-d, if only Gav was a RHD. The top pairing would absolutely be a solved problem.)
bdb a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage