SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Offseason

Créé par: Podkolzinmvp
Équipe: 2022-23 Blackhawks de Chicago
Date de création initiale: 5 juill. 2022
Publié: 5 juill. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
22 250 000 $
21 000 000 $
3950 000 $
1750 000 $
2762 500 $
13 750 000 $
2800 000 $
13 850 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2775 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
CHI
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2022 (LAK)
DET
  1. Khaira, Jujhar
Détails additionnels:
Anywhere for late pick
2.
CHI
  1. Bernier, Jonathan
  2. Kuokkanen, Janne
  3. Okhotiuk, Nikita
  4. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NJD)
  5. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (NJD)
Détails additionnels:
2023 2nd turns into 2023 first if NJD make the 2nd round in 2023 playoffs.
3.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TBL)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
4.
CHI
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (COL)
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (NYI)
5.
CHI
  1. Zaitsev, Nikita
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (OTT)
  3. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (NSH)
OTT
    Future Considerations
    Frais appliqués
    Enfoui
    Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
    2022
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de MIN
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de COL
    Logo de EDM
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de VGK
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CBJ
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de LAK
    2023
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de NJD
    Logo de OTT
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de NYI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de NSH
    2024
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de TBL
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CGY
    Logo de CHI
    Logo de CHI
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2282 500 000 $65 762 628 $237 500 $425 000 $16 737 372 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
    AG, C
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
    C, AD
    RFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
    AD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    10 500 000 $10 500 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    758 333 $758 333 $
    AD
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    1 825 000 $1 825 000 $
    AG, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    750 000 $750 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    950 000 $950 000 $
    AG, C, AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    870 000 $870 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AD, C
    RFA - 2
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
    DD
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de Devils du New Jersey
    4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    775 000 $775 000 $
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    UFA - 1
    Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
    4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
    DD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    1 150 000 $1 150 000 $
    AD, C, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
    800 000 $800 000 $
    AG, C
    RFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    5 juill. 2022 à 3 h 5
    #1
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: oct. 2019
    Messages: 4,986
    Mentions "j'aime": 2,356
    Keep Khaira and Cat with those offers, Strome and Kubalik are fair offers for their rights, maybe a little too much for but I think 2nd/3rd is their value for their rights.
    5 juill. 2022 à 3 h 55
    #2
    Glep
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: sept. 2018
    Messages: 2,391
    Mentions "j'aime": 911
    Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
    Keep Khaira and Cat with those offers, Strome and Kubalik are fair offers for their rights, maybe a little too much for but I think 2nd/3rd is their value for their rights.


    As a fan of neither the hawks or the devils, the 2nd alone should be plenty fair. I’d only start adding after the 4th pick for cat. I know the hawks want a kings ransom for cat but the second pick alone is a kings ransom. Could be wright if they are lucky, slafkovsky most likely, and Cooley if they really like him. Trading this years pick for jones was awful because it makes the need for a top pick in the draft higher. Anything more than the second pick and young roster player and the devils are losing that trade. Claiming the 2nd pick plus kuokkanen isn’t enough for cat is just being delusional. I’m sure whoever is drafted at 2 and is properly developed will be better than cat within 5 years. Not to mention all the extra stuff the hawks got in this mock team.
    5 juill. 2022 à 5 h 1
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2022
    Messages: 32
    Mentions "j'aime": 10
    Quoting: Hurricanes73
    As a fan of neither the hawks or the devils, the 2nd alone should be plenty fair. I’d only start adding after the 4th pick for cat. I know the hawks want a kings ransom for cat but the second pick alone is a kings ransom. Could be wright if they are lucky, slafkovsky most likely, and Cooley if they really like him. Trading this years pick for jones was awful because it makes the need for a top pick in the draft higher. Anything more than the second pick and young roster player and the devils are losing that trade. Claiming the 2nd pick plus kuokkanen isn’t enough for cat is just being delusional. I’m sure whoever is drafted at 2 and is properly developed will be better than cat within 5 years. Not to mention all the extra stuff the hawks got in this mock team.

    I wouldn’t trade debrincat for any one player in this draft
    ChiHawk et Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2022 à 5 h 22
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2017
    Messages: 19,205
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,568
    Quoting: Hurricanes73
    As a fan of neither the hawks or the devils, the 2nd alone should be plenty fair. I’d only start adding after the 4th pick for cat. I know the hawks want a kings ransom for cat but the second pick alone is a kings ransom. Could be wright if they are lucky, slafkovsky most likely, and Cooley if they really like him. Trading this years pick for jones was awful because it makes the need for a top pick in the draft higher. Anything more than the second pick and young roster player and the devils are losing that trade. Claiming the 2nd pick plus kuokkanen isn’t enough for cat is just being delusional. I’m sure whoever is drafted at 2 and is properly developed will be better than cat within 5 years. Not to mention all the extra stuff the hawks got in this mock team.


    Proven elite 24 year old NHL players are worth more then a unproven player hands down and it’s not close.
    Chicago88 et Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
    5 juill. 2022 à 7 h 25
    #5
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2019
    Messages: 40,746
    Mentions "j'aime": 18,543
    Hawks should keep DeBrincat...at least for first two years of their 4-year rebuild. Maybe trade him as deadline rental in late 2023-24. That would be so much better for team than a decade of Wright or Slafkovsky, both of whom are already total busts.
    5 juill. 2022 à 10 h 19
    #6
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mai 2022
    Messages: 163
    Mentions "j'aime": 79
    Quoting: Hurricanes73
    As a fan of neither the hawks or the devils, the 2nd alone should be plenty fair. I’d only start adding after the 4th pick for cat. I know the hawks want a kings ransom for cat but the second pick alone is a kings ransom. Could be wright if they are lucky, slafkovsky most likely, and Cooley if they really like him. Trading this years pick for jones was awful because it makes the need for a top pick in the draft higher. Anything more than the second pick and young roster player and the devils are losing that trade. Claiming the 2nd pick plus kuokkanen isn’t enough for cat is just being delusional. I’m sure whoever is drafted at 2 and is properly developed will be better than cat within 5 years. Not to mention all the extra stuff the hawks got in this mock team.


    The hawks already turned down two first and a prospect. The 2OA is nowhere close in value. Not only is this a very weak draft class but even the top end guys aren’t all that amazing. Debrincat is a 24 year old elite winger, that is going to take a big package to even get a conversation going
    5 juill. 2022 à 10 h 41
    #7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2019
    Messages: 11,113
    Mentions "j'aime": 10,987
    Pass.
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage