SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Sandin over Muzz

Créé par: MSZUDY21
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Date de création initiale: 26 juin 2022
Publié: 26 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
21 500 000 $
22 000 000 $
22 000 000 $
21 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
43 250 000 $
21 250 000 $
21 500 000 $
42 750 000 $
66 000 000 $
21 250 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (WPG)
3.
TOR
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
4.
TOR
  1. Lemieux, Brendan [Droits de RFA]
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de WPG
Logo de CBJ
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de PIT
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $82 283 116 $212 500 $0 $216 884 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
950 000 $950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 640 250 $11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
10 903 000 $10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
11 000 000 $11 000 000 $
C, AG
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
6 962 366 $6 962 366 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 7
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
827 500 $827 500 $
C, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
837 500 $837 500 $
C
RFA - 2
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
900 000 $900 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
7 500 000 $7 500 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
800 000 $800 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Maple Leafs de Toronto
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 2
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 3
#1
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Muzzin is a negative asset 🤦‍♂️
SlevinKalevra et OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 5
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,321
Mentions "j'aime": 2,739
Don’t see anybody giving you positive value for Muzzin. Flat cap
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 5
#3
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Why pay anyone 6 million long term? You can likely find equal productivity from this year's version of Bunting and save major money. With Matthews, Nylander and Marner all needing contracts in 2-3 years, you need to plan for that. And overpaying a secondary forward on a hero playoff run will kill their cap. Tyler Johnson ring a bell? Or Kruger from Chicago? Never overpay depth guys.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 6
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 887
Mentions "j'aime": 137
Josh Brown should not be an nhl player
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 7
#5
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Isles5513
Muzzin is a negative asset 🤦‍♂️


Top 4 defenceman, who excel at being physical and shutting down the oppositions best have no value now eh? What's next, Matthews has negative value because he scores too many goals and that hurts the feelings of other players? Muzzin has good value without a doubt. No question at all. Muzzin being a bad player is simply the hope of the anti leaf mob.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 9
#6
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Top 4 defenceman, who excel at being physical and shutting down the oppositions best have no value now eh? What's next, Matthews has negative value because he scores too many goals and that hurts the feelings of other players? Muzzin has good value without a doubt. No question at all. Muzzin being a bad player is simply the hope of the anti leaf mob.


I’m not sure anybody is interested in joining an anti leaf’s movement lol. He’s an injury prone defenseman who is overpaid and has a full NTC
OldNYIfan, SlevinKalevra, KINGS67 and 1 other person a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 9
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 20,083
Mentions "j'aime": 7,483
Muzzin is worth significantly more than a mid 3rd and a bad 4th liner
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 9
#8
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Don’t see anybody giving you positive value for Muzzin. Flat cap


Boy if one down year makes someone have negative value, what are Benn and Seguin worth these days? Or Klingberg? Funny how everyone's entire careers means nothing once the put on a leaf jersey and then get traded on this site.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 9
#9
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 41,375
Mentions "j'aime": 26,106
It never ceases to amaze me how so many Toronto fans are so abysmally ignorant about their own team that they don't know why Jake Muzzin asked for, and Kyle Dubas gave him, an absolute NTC when he signed his new contract with the Maple Leafs on February 24, 2020. And due to our desire to acquire either a top-line forward or #1 LD or both this off-season, and the resulting need for every dollar of cap space, we wouldn't have any interest in Muzzin with less than 40% retention.
Not_Isles5513 a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 9
#10
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Top 4 defenceman, who excel at being physical and shutting down the oppositions best have no value now eh? What's next, Matthews has negative value because he scores too many goals and that hurts the feelings of other players? Muzzin has good value without a doubt. No question at all. Muzzin being a bad player is simply the hope of the anti leaf mob.


You can’t trust him. He’s a walking concussion bro.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 10
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 20,083
Mentions "j'aime": 7,483
Quoting: Isles5513
Muzzin is a negative asset 🤦‍♂️


if muzzin is a negative asset then 3/4 of the league is
Keon a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 10
#12
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
Muzzin is worth significantly more than a mid 3rd and a bad 4th liner


Saying he has value doesn’t make it true
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 11
#13
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
if muzzin is a negative asset then 3/4 of the league is


No they really aren’t lol. I didn’t say Brodie was a negative asset. I said an injury prone lefty with a high cap hit was a negative asset lol.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 12
#14
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: OldNYIfan
It never ceases to amaze me how so many Toronto fans are so abysmally ignorant about their own team that they don't know why Jake Muzzin asked for, and Kyle Dubas gave him, an absolute NTC when he signed his new contract with the Maple Leafs on February 24, 2020. And due to our desire to acquire either a top-line forward or #1 LD or both this off-season, and the resulting need for every dollar of cap space, we wouldn't have any interest in Muzzin with less than 40% retention.


I’ve seen leaf’s fans defend the Muzzin trade on here… there is no reasoning with that
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 12
#15
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Isles5513
I’m not sure anybody is interested in joining an anti leaf’s movement lol. He’s an injury prone defenseman who is overpaid and has a full NTC


I guess we should swap him for Pulock then? He's an injury prone player who makes to much as well eh? Muzzin has played basically full seasons in 7 of his 9 years in the NHL. Pulock has only two full seasons without injury. Better write him off as well eh? What a joke
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 13
#16
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 7,025
Mentions "j'aime": 2,871
Kings have much better options when it comes to spending $5.625M for the next 2 years than a 33 year old D man that they don't need.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 13
#17
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 20,083
Mentions "j'aime": 7,483
Quoting: Isles5513
No they really aren’t lol. I didn’t say Brodie was a negative asset. I said an injury prone lefty with a high cap hit was a negative asset lol.


except he isnt injury prone and his cap hit is fair for what he brings, and that's before you add that intangibles tax that gms love and every single player that isnt a leaf but hits gets around here.
Muzzin is very valuable and if he was available someone would pay a lot for him.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 13
#18
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: Isles5513
You can’t trust him. He’s a walking concussion bro.


I guess so is Crosby? Or literally every player in hockey who's ever had one? You're obviously just trolling
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 13
#19
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
I guess we should swap him for Pulock then? He's an injury prone player who makes to much as well eh? Muzzin has played basically full seasons in 7 of his 9 years in the NHL. Pulock has only two full seasons without injury. Better write him off as well eh? What a joke


Dude ur a clown lmao. Muzzin has a long concussion history. Pulock got hit by a shot. There’s a huge difference and Muzzin was never and will never be as good as Pulock Lmao.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 13
#20
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 20,083
Mentions "j'aime": 7,483
Quoting: Isles5513
Saying he has value doesn’t make it true


saying he doesnt have value doesnt make it true either
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 14
#21
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
I guess so is Crosby? Or literally every player in hockey who's ever had one? You're obviously just trolling


Crosby is a generational talent who overcame it. Muzzin has been banged up for the better part of two seasons and is a 33 year old d man in steep decline. Get real.
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 16
#22
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: JaredOfLondon
saying he doesnt have value doesnt make it true either


Pretty sure Leaf’s fans don’t think he’s good either lol.

https://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/platform/amp/2022/4/5/23010633/jake-muzzins-horrible-no-good-bad-year-maple-leafs-defenceman-returns-to-lineup
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 17
#23
Owly
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 4,559
Mentions "j'aime": 932
Quoting: OldNYIfan
It never ceases to amaze me how so many Toronto fans are so abysmally ignorant about their own team that they don't know why Jake Muzzin asked for, and Kyle Dubas gave him, an absolute NTC when he signed his new contract with the Maple Leafs on February 24, 2020. And due to our desire to acquire either a top-line forward or #1 LD or both this off-season, and the resulting need for every dollar of cap space, we wouldn't have any interest in Muzzin with less than 40% retention.


To be fair, it's not easy being a leaf fan on here. 50% of the people on here hate the Leafs more than they like hockey. So anything you say you get crapped on. Now couple that with the large proportion of people on here who obviously don't really know much about hockey (this is most people of all fan bases, Leafs included) and the natural bias we all have, it's hard to know what will or will not make sense sometimes.

That being said, I am not sure I would trade Muzzin but if Dubas decides to, he can make it happen without much trouble. Contrary to guys like the Islander fan on this thread who hates TO more than he likes the Islanders, he's still a top 4 shutdown defenceman who is a playoff warrior. That has value
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 18
#24
1GarthSnowFan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 11,744
Mentions "j'aime": 4,803
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
To be fair, it's not easy being a leaf fan on here. 50% of the people on here hate the Leafs more than they like hockey. So anything you say you get crapped on. Now couple that with the large proportion of people on here who obviously don't really know much about hockey (this is most people of all fan bases, Leafs included) and the natural bias we all have, it's hard to know what will or will not make sense sometimes.

That being said, I am not sure I would trade Muzzin but if Dubas decides to, he can make it happen without much trouble. Contrary to guys like the Islander fan on this thread who hates TO more than he likes the Islanders, he's still a top 4 shutdown defenceman who is a playoff warrior. That has value


I don’t like the islanders either lmao. But everyone and I mean everyone dislikes Jake Muzzin. Don’t act like I’m the only one.

https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/maple-leafs-looking-cause-muzzins-inconsistency-hes-got-give/sn-amp/
26 juin 2022 à 14 h 18
#25
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 5,321
Mentions "j'aime": 2,739
Quoting: Logan_Ollivier
Top 4 defenceman, who excel at being physical and shutting down the oppositions best have no value now eh? What's next, Matthews has negative value because he scores too many goals and that hurts the feelings of other players? Muzzin has good value without a doubt. No question at all. Muzzin being a bad player is simply the hope of the anti leaf mob.


He’s 33. You claim he is a physical shut down defenseman, but was a minus 6 on a team with a positive goal differential. He’s on the decline at just under six million per. Competitive teams don’t have cap space for him. Non playoff teams are better off keeping their picks. I just don’t see a market for him at positive value unless Toronto retains salary. You might get lucky tho. Somebody traded for Kieth lol
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage