SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

CHI blockbuster

Créé par: Komisarek
Équipe: 2022-23 Sénateurs d'Ottawa
Date de création initiale: 17 juin 2022
Publié: 17 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
2825 000 $
RFAANSCAP HIT
66 750 000 $
43 500 000 $
21 750 000 $
21 750 000 $
11 000 000 $
2800 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1750 000 $
1750 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. DeBrincat, Alex
  2. Strome, Dylan [Droits de RFA]
  3. Vlasic, Alex
Détails additionnels:
DeBrincat signs 8.5x8 extension
CHI
  1. Murray, Matt
  2. Stützle, Tim
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (OTT)
Détails additionnels:
7th OA pick
2.
Rachats de contrats
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de BOS
Logo de WPG
Logo de OTT
Logo de NYI
2023
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de TBL
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
Logo de OTT
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2382 500 000 $71 585 714 $0 $2 800 000 $10 914 286 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 205 714 $8 205 714 $
AG
UFA - 6
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
6 750 000 $6 750 000 $
C
UFA - 8
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
4 975 000 $4 975 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
6 400 000 $6 400 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG
RFA
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
863 333 $863 333 $
C, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
950 000 $950 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 550 000 $2 550 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Blackhawks de Chicago
916 667 $916 667 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
787 500 $787 500 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance925 000 $$925K)
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance600 000 $$600K)
C
RFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 300 000 $1 300 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance425 000 $$425K)
DD
RFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
17 juin 2022 à 12 h 33
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,626
Mentions "j'aime": 5,216
No thanks from NSH. Farrance has more potential than Brännström, and Del Zotto wouldn't have much opportunity to be more than a healthy scratch in NSH.
17 juin 2022 à 12 h 35
#2
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,949
Mentions "j'aime": 23,972
Yikes. This trade doesn’t make ottawa better
17 juin 2022 à 12 h 37
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 9,527
Mentions "j'aime": 8,968
lol we’re not trading stutzle at all, let alone stutzle AND 7oa in the same deal. that’s horrendous for ottawa. the whole point of trading for debrincat would be to play him with stutzle
csick, gmgb et Rudd a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2022 à 12 h 47
#4
Hotsam Batcho
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 110
Mentions "j'aime": 74
Absolutely not trading Stützle. He is an untouchable and should always be an untouchable.
csick a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2022 à 12 h 50
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 69
The Hawks easily pass. Stützle and the 1st isn't a bad starting point, but it's ultimately two firsts. Stützle is a good offer, but the 70a is in a weak draft class. You also asked that the Hawks take on Murray, which is a salary dump, IE the sens would have to pay the hawks to do that. Then you're asking for not just Debrincat, but also the rights to Strome and Vlassic (a very good defensive prospect). I'd say storm and Vlassic are worth, at least, a second. It'd cost at least a 3rd for me to take Murray.
17 juin 2022 à 13 h 17
#6
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,949
Mentions "j'aime": 23,972
Quoting: jance
The Hawks easily pass. Stützle and the 1st isn't a bad starting point, but it's ultimately two firsts. Stützle is a good offer, but the 70a is in a weak draft class. You also asked that the Hawks take on Murray, which is a salary dump, IE the sens would have to pay the hawks to do that. Then you're asking for not just Debrincat, but also the rights to Strome and Vlassic (a very good defensive prospect). I'd say storm and Vlassic are worth, at least, a second. It'd cost at least a 3rd for me to take Murray.


2 1sts ? Do u know how players values work? Stutzle is worth at least 3 1sts right now and the 7th overall is higher than the value of a regular 1st, closer to 2 1sts. So that’s 5 1sts for Debrincat and Strome. That’s ridiculous
17 juin 2022 à 13 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2022
Messages: 100
Mentions "j'aime": 69
Quoting: csick
2 1sts ? Do u know how players values work? Stutzle is worth at least 3 1sts right now and the 7th overall is higher than the value of a regular 1st, closer to 2 1sts. So that’s 5 1sts for Debrincat and Strome. That’s ridiculous


I think you're overvaluing the 7th overall. Again, it's a weak draft. It's not worth anything more than the 10 or 11th. I also think you overvaluing Stutzle, I may have undervalued him, but there is no way a .66 ppg player who is a career -45 is worth 3 1sts. If he is, Debrincat is worth more. Yeah, Stutzle is young and developing, but at most I'd say he's worth 2 firsts. So in my eye, the 7th overall isn't worth any more than a mid-1st, definitely not worth 2. If it were the 7th in 2023 then yeah, you would be right, but not in the 2022 draft. Add in the fact you are dumping murry, which you need to pay for, and the op was asking for Vlassic (a young, high-level defensive defenseman prospect), yeah, this is an underpay by Ottawa.
17 juin 2022 à 13 h 41
#8
KFTW
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 42,949
Mentions "j'aime": 23,972
Quoting: jance
I think you're overvaluing the 7th overall. Again, it's a weak draft. It's not worth anything more than the 10 or 11th. I also think you overvaluing Stutzle, I may have undervalued him, but there is no way a .66 ppg player who is a career -45 is worth 3 1sts. If he is, Debrincat is worth more. Yeah, Stutzle is young and developing, but at most I'd say he's worth 2 firsts. So in my eye, the 7th overall isn't worth any more than a mid-1st, definitely not worth 2. If it were the 7th in 2023 then yeah, you would be right, but not in the 2022 draft. Add in the fact you are dumping murry, which you need to pay for, and the op was asking for Vlassic (a young, high-level defensive defenseman prospect), yeah, this is an underpay by Ottawa.


Stutzle finished the year with 58pts and was trending at a point per game playing with weak line mates . He’s at least 70+ next year. He’s also a centre now and was solid defensively . The 1st is one of Gauthier, Savoie or Kemell . Stutzle + 7th > Holtz + 2nd. And NJ wouldn’t offer that
athrin a aimé ceci.
17 juin 2022 à 14 h 54
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 92
Mentions "j'aime": 11
Thanos was right.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage