Forums/Armchair-GM

Gibson

Créé par: Napparific
Date de création initiale: 13 juin 2022
Publié: 13 juin 2022
Équipe: 2022-23 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
Liljegren, Timothy11 750 000 $
Sandin, Rasmus11 750 000 $
Engvall, Pierre12 750 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
Lyubushkin, Ilya11 000 000 $
Holtby, Braden12 400 000 $
Transactions
1.
TOR
    Future considerations
    ARI
    1. Holl, Justin
    2.
    TOR
    1. Gibson, John
    2. Comtois, Maxime (1 000 000 $ retained)
    ANA
    1. Kerfoot, Alexander
    2. Mrázek, Petr
    3. Knies, Matthew [Liste de réserve]
    4. 2022 1e round pick (TOR)
    Détails additionnels:
    I think Kerfoot pushes this deal over the top, might be a slight overpay from Toronto given how promising Knies is and how average Gibson has been for 3 years but if you're the leafs you're betting in a return to form. Anaheim can really stock the cupboards with this haul and get a cost-controlled roster player in Kerfoot in exchange for taking Mrazek
    ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
    2022
    Logo de WPG
    Logo de TOR
    2023
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    2024
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    Logo de TOR
    TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
    2182 500 000 $82 477 283 $212 500 $0 $22 717 $
    Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
    Logo de TOR
    Bunting, Michael
    950 000 $
    AG
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Matthews, Auston
    11 640 250 $
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo de TOR
    Nylander, William
    6 962 366 $
    AD, AG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de TOR
    Robertson, Nicholas
    796 667 $
    AG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de TOR
    Tavares, John
    11 000 000 $
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo de TOR
    Marner, Mitchell
    10 903 000 $
    AD
    UFA - 3
    Logo de TOR
    Engvall, Pierre
    2 750 000 $
    AG, AD, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Kämpf, David
    1 500 000 $
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Anderson, Joey
    750 000 $
    AD
    RFA - 1
    Logo de ANA
    Comtois, Maxime
    1 037 500 $
    AG
    RFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Abruzzese, Nick
    850 000 $
    C
    RFA - 1
    Logo de TOR
    Simmonds, Wayne
    900 000 $
    AD, AG
    NTC
    UFA - 1
    Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
    Logo de TOR
    Rielly, Morgan
    7 500 000 $
    DG
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    Logo de TOR
    Brodie, TJ
    5 000 000 $
    DG/DD
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de ANA
    Gibson, John
    6 400 000 $
    G
    NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo de TOR
    Muzzin, Jake
    5 625 000 $
    DG
    NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo de TOR
    Liljegren, Timothy
    1 750 000 $
    DD
    RFA - 2
    Holtby, Braden
    2 400 000 $
    G
    UFA
    Logo de TOR
    Giordano, Mark
    800 000 $
    DG
    UFA - 2
    Logo de TOR
    Sandin, Rasmus
    1 750 000 $
    DG
    RFA - 2
    Logo de TOR
    Lyubushkin, Ilya
    1 000 000 $
    DD
    UFA - 2

    Code d'intégration

    • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
    • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

    Texte intégré

    Cliquer pour surligner
    13 juin à 15 h 40
    #1
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 12,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,941
    How exactly does Kerfoot push the deal over the top? He's signed for 1 year, which is a season where the Ducks clearly won't be contending.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    13 juin à 15 h 40
    #2
    First NY Then LA
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 30,099
    Mentions "j'aime": 17,219
    Kerfoot and Mrazek push the deal under water.
    13 juin à 15 h 48
    #3
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2015
    Messages: 50
    Mentions "j'aime": 8
    Why is it always Kerfoot?....every deal on this site. tears of joy
    OldNYIfan et CD282 a aimé ceci.
    13 juin à 15 h 53
    #4
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2016
    Messages: 987
    Mentions "j'aime": 311
    Quoting: OldNYIfan
    Kerfoot and Mrazek push the deal under water.


    Kerfoot just put up 50 points on a great contract. In what way does he push it under water? Mrazek 100% agree but come on... good team or not, Kerfoot still put up points moving throughout the lineup.
    13 juin à 16 h 29
    #5
    First NY Then LA
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 30,099
    Mentions "j'aime": 17,219
    Quoting: KPasty
    Kerfoot just put up 50 points on a great contract. In what way does he push it under water? Mrazek 100% agree but come on... good team or not, Kerfoot still put up points moving throughout the lineup.


    Kerfoot is a rental. By definition, any rental involved in a trade for players with 4 and 5 years' term is a throw-in. He pushes the deal under the surface because he's nowhere near the value of Comtois. Take Comtois out and I wouldn't say Kerfoot pushes the deal under water, just Mrazek.
    13 juin à 16 h 29
    #6
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 172
    Mentions "j'aime": 33
    Quoting: Lenny7
    How exactly does Kerfoot push the deal over the top? He's signed for 1 year, which is a season where the Ducks clearly won't be contending.


    50 point guy, cost controlled, owed
    13 juin à 16 h 30
    #7
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 172
    Mentions "j'aime": 33
    Quoting: OldNYIfan
    Kerfoot is a rental. By definition, any rental involved in a trade for players with 4 and 5 years' term is a throw-in. He pushes the deal under the surface because he's nowhere near the value of Comtois. Take Comtois out and I wouldn't say Kerfoot pushes the deal under water, just Mrazek.


    Lol what a stupid arguement. Really? Any rental is a throw in no matter what if there is a long term deal involved? So if Matthews had a year left on his deal and was being traded for Dahlin with 3 years left would Matthews be a throw in?
    Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
    13 juin à 16 h 31
    #8
    Démarrer sujet
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: avr. 2020
    Messages: 172
    Mentions "j'aime": 33
    Quoting: Lenny7
    How exactly does Kerfoot push the deal over the top? He's signed for 1 year, which is a season where the Ducks clearly won't be contending.


    So the ducks just want to ice a team of scrubs forever?
    13 juin à 16 h 35
    #9
    First NY Then LA
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: juin 2018
    Messages: 30,099
    Mentions "j'aime": 17,219
    Quoting: Napparific
    Lol what a stupid arguement. Really? Any rental is a throw in no matter what if there is a long term deal involved? So if Matthews had a year left on his deal and was being traded for Dahlin with 3 years left would Matthews be a throw in?


    Only you would construe my comment as equating Kerfoot with Matthews.

    Once again, Yes, bottom-6 rental forwards are throw-ins in deals involving players with 4 or 5 years' term. That's how hockey works.
    Lenny7 a aimé ceci.
    13 juin à 17 h 35
    #10
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 12,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,941
    Quoting: Napparific
    So the ducks just want to ice a team of scrubs forever?


    Does 1 year of Kerfoot change the outcome in Anaheim?
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    13 juin à 17 h 36
    #11
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 12,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,941
    Quoting: Napparific
    50 point guy, cost controlled, owed


    For one year. Heck, if I was a contending team I’d be all over him, which begs the question of why Leafers have such a hard on to move him.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    13 juin à 17 h 36
    #12
    Lenny7
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: janv. 2017
    Messages: 12,215
    Mentions "j'aime": 9,941
    Quoting: Napparific
    Lol what a stupid arguement. Really? Any rental is a throw in no matter what if there is a long term deal involved? So if Matthews had a year left on his deal and was being traded for Dahlin with 3 years left would Matthews be a throw in?


    Rental to contender-good.
    Rental to rebuilding team-Very, very dumb.
    OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
    13 juin à 17 h 49
    #13
    Avatar de l'utilisateur
    Rejoint: mars 2017
    Messages: 20,053
    Mentions "j'aime": 6,245
    Quoting: BlackieO
    Why is it always Kerfoot?....every deal on this site. tears of joy


    Because nobody is touching the Tavares contract?
     
    Répondre
    To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
    Question:
    Options:
    Ajouter une option
    Soumettre le sondage