SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Best Friends

Créé par: Prime_Jimbo
Équipe: 2022-23 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 11 juin 2022
Publié: 11 juin 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
65 500 000 $
22 250 000 $
2950 000 $
2800 000 $
21 000 000 $
2750 000 $
22 500 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
1900 000 $
Transactions
1.
2.
EDM
  1. Boeser, Brock [Droits de RFA]
3.
4.
VAN
  1. Roy, Nicolas [Droits de RFA]
VGK
  1. Ferland, Micheal
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
  3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (VAN)
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2282 500 000 $81 124 166 $1 250 000 $850 000 $1 375 834 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
5 500 000 $5 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 4
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 1
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 5
Logo de Kraken de Seattle
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Flames de Calgary
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
C, AG
UFA
900 000 $900 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 5
Logo de Oilers d'Edmonton
4 500 000 $4 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 3

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
11 juin 2022 à 20 h 14
#1
westleysnipez
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2022
Messages: 1,385
Mentions "j'aime": 588
Vegas doesn't do that trade, they'd see no benefit from acquiring Ferland unless a cap hit is moved out, likely Dadonov, maybe Carrier.

Calgary can't trade Lucic to Vancouver, he has the Canucks on his NTC.
11 juin 2022 à 20 h 19
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 2,796
Mentions "j'aime": 1,389
VAN say no EDM trade. VAN would not move Miller in the same division.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2022 à 20 h 22
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2021
Messages: 2,796
Mentions "j'aime": 1,389
Quoting: westleysnipez
Vegas doesn't do that trade, they'd see no benefit from acquiring Ferland unless a cap hit is moved out, likely Dadonov, maybe Carrier.

Calgary can't trade Lucic to Vancouver, he has the Canucks on his NTC.


Lucic is from East Vancouver... he was almost got traded to VAN, Eriksson just wouldn't waive for EDM.
FilthyMitts05 a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2022 à 20 h 28
#4
Smokewise Ganja
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2018
Messages: 1,290
Mentions "j'aime": 306
Why would Vancouver do that they’ve got enough liabilities on D🥲
11 juin 2022 à 20 h 33
#5
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,439
Mentions "j'aime": 1,961
Quoting: smokewiseganja
Why would Vancouver do that they’ve got enough liabilities on D🥲


Can't be any worse! He may not be in his prime but he's probably available and seemed to be more of an overall contributor this season.
11 juin 2022 à 20 h 45
#6
CGY
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2015
Messages: 5,554
Mentions "j'aime": 2,073
Quoting: westleysnipez


Calgary can't trade Lucic to Vancouver, he has the Canucks on his NTC.


That's interesting. I remember in the 2016 offseason he was linked to EDM, VAN and even CGY.

I know it hasn't always been easy for him going home to Vancouver, being a Bruin and all.
11 juin 2022 à 21 h 43
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,705
Mentions "j'aime": 20,446
Jesus, what a massive overpay for a rental
11 juin 2022 à 23 h 1
#8
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,439
Mentions "j'aime": 1,961
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
Jesus, what a massive overpay for a rental


Not really. Not to mention there's more to the trade. They can turn around and bring back Johnny, Tkatchuk and add JT plus Nils whose better than Zary. And stop with the "rental" madness, name another 100 pt guy available? Flames love adding Canucks anyway.
Knuckl3s a aimé ceci.
11 juin 2022 à 23 h 7
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 175
Mentions "j'aime": 72
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Not really. Not to mention there's more to the trade. They can turn around and bring back Johnny, Tkatchuk and add JT plus Nils whose better than Zary. And stop with the "rental" madness, name another 100 pt guy available? Flames love adding Canucks anyway.


…but he is a rental
12 juin 2022 à 0 h 19
#10
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,705
Mentions "j'aime": 20,446
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
Not really. Not to mention there's more to the trade. They can turn around and bring back Johnny, Tkatchuk and add JT plus Nils whose better than Zary. And stop with the "rental" madness, name another 100 pt guy available? Flames love adding Canucks anyway.


I love Miller but I wouldn't even do this if you replaced Mangiapane with Monahan. Rentals just don't carry this type of value.

Another 100 point guy available? How about Pastrnak? Would you trade Podkolzin + Nils + Boeser + Myers for 1 year of Pasta Studnicka?
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
12 juin 2022 à 0 h 31
#11
Démarrer sujet
VAN
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2022
Messages: 6,439
Mentions "j'aime": 1,961
Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
I love Miller but I wouldn't even do this if you replaced Mangiapane with Monahan. Rentals just don't carry this type of value.

Another 100 point guy available? How about Pastrnak? Would you trade Podkolzin + Nils + Boeser + Myers for 1 year of Pasta Studnicka?


I think the Flames window is largely here. A trade like this makes them just as good, if not better. It will be hard to move Lucic as his 10 teams will likely be contenders who won't have space to take him on and the Flames may be slightly talented next year unless Pelletier, Vakamaki, etc make the jump.

I personally don't believe Pasta is available despite the rumor mill getting excited over a player with 1 year left.

I would not like the Canucks to give up those pieces as you laid out given they are NHL regulars. And besides Mangiapane/Boeser comp, the other players are doing well in the NHL where as those have yet to take the step. Don't get me wrong, Pelletier looks like he will be sweet to watch on the ice.

Though if I were a Flames fan, I'd probably want them team to offer Mangiapane, Zary, Pelletier and Lucic for Pasta. Canucks window just isn't here as much as they want to force it.
12 juin 2022 à 7 h 13
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 39,705
Mentions "j'aime": 20,446
Quoting: Prime_Jimbo
I think the Flames window is largely here. A trade like this makes them just as good, if not better. It will be hard to move Lucic as his 10 teams will likely be contenders who won't have space to take him on and the Flames may be slightly talented next year unless Pelletier, Vakamaki, etc make the jump.

I personally don't believe Pasta is available despite the rumor mill getting excited over a player with 1 year left.

I would not like the Canucks to give up those pieces as you laid out given they are NHL regulars. And besides Mangiapane/Boeser comp, the other players are doing well in the NHL where as those have yet to take the step. Don't get me wrong, Pelletier looks like he will be sweet to watch on the ice.

Though if I were a Flames fan, I'd probably want them team to offer Mangiapane, Zary, Pelletier and Lucic for Pasta. Canucks window just isn't here as much as they want to force it.


A few things here.
1. Adding JT Miller would be a great move, not arguing that
2. Whether you personally believe Pasta is available or not is irrelevant
3. Pelletier and Zary are fairly similar caliber prospects to Nils and Pod despite Calgary not bringing them up right away
4. Looch's has already waived his clause twice and he's not chasing a cup at this point, hell he might even retire after his last signing bonus
Prime_Jimbo a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage