SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

I asked Siri to pick a number 1-32 and I got 5 I guess Ill rebuild Calgary

Créé par: Sebi
Équipe: 2022-23 Flames de Calgary
Date de création initiale: 29 mai 2022
Publié: 29 mai 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Most ppl I see that do Calgary automatically assume Johnny is for sure signing in Philly. Although I agree, I think Calgary have a good roster and with proper cap management can be cup contenders. With that being said, Gaudreau resigning isn’t out of the realm of realism and I think it’s 50/50 that he comes back.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
88 500 000 $
55 750 000 $
2775 000 $
33 250 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
811 500 000 $
11 800 000 $
21 750 000 $
22 450 000 $
Transactions
1.
CGY
    Dump
    ANA
    1. Lucic, Milan
    2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
    3. Choix de 4e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
    2.
    CGY
      Sucks that it had to end like this
      BUF
      1. Kuznetsov, Yan
      2. Monahan, Sean
      3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2024 (CGY)
      Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
      2022
      Logo de CGY
      Logo de CGY
      Logo de CGY
      2023
      Logo de CGY
      Logo de CGY
      Logo de CGY
      Logo de CGY
      2024
      Logo de CGY
      Logo de CGY
      Logo de CGY
      TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
      2082 500 000 $71 462 500 $0 $0 $11 037 500 $
      Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      11 500 000 $11 500 000 $
      AG
      UFA - 7
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      4 850 000 $4 850 000 $
      C, AD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      8 500 000 $8 500 000 $
      AD
      UFA - 8
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 3
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      5 350 000 $5 350 000 $
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
      AD, AG
      NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      2 300 000 $2 300 000 $
      AG, AD, C
      RFA - 2
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      2 450 000 $2 450 000 $
      AD, C, AG
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      2 125 000 $2 125 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 2
      1 800 000 $1 800 000 $
      AG, AD
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      775 000 $775 000 $
      AG, C
      UFA - 2
      1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
      AD, AG
      UFA - 1
      Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      1 237 500 $1 237 500 $
      DG
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      4 550 000 $4 550 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
      G
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
      DG/DD
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
      DD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      750 000 $750 000 $
      G
      UFA - 1
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      1 550 000 $1 550 000 $
      DG
      RFA - 1
      Logo de Flames de Calgary
      950 000 $950 000 $
      DD
      UFA - 1

      Code d'intégration

      • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
      • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

      Texte intégré

      Cliquer pour surligner
      29 mai 2022 à 3 h 46
      #1
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 11,284
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,686
      your giving up much more to move Lucic snd Monahan. both contracts need to move or you don’t sign Gaudreau and teams know this and know your going to be desperate.
      29 mai 2022 à 3 h 54
      #2
      Démarrer sujet
      (ExiledSebi)
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2021
      Messages: 74
      Mentions "j'aime": 18
      Fair enough. Monahan has the capabilities to have a good bounce back season with a team like Buffalo so I think a second and a prospect could be about fair. As for lucic I think u may be right. Maybe a first or 2 seconds for lucic tbh
      29 mai 2022 à 4 h 22
      #3
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2021
      Messages: 7,136
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
      Sabres say maybe
      I can’t see us wanting Monahan, but maybe the 2nd & prospect are enough to get us to take him?
      29 mai 2022 à 4 h 43
      #4
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2021
      Messages: 202
      Mentions "j'aime": 71
      So basically the plan is, ditch your two worst contracts, replace your 4th line wingers, and run it back?

      I mean sure. I suppose. That's something all right. It's not even a bad strategy it's just so like. Idk. Average....
      29 mai 2022 à 4 h 49
      #5
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 38,602
      Mentions "j'aime": 19,716
      Monahan has already been reported to be oh pretty high interest. It definitely won't cost that much to move him, he actually probably returns slightly positive value assuming he is healthy. Lucic should not cost more than a 2nd to move
      29 mai 2022 à 5 h 2
      #6
      Démarrer sujet
      (ExiledSebi)
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2021
      Messages: 74
      Mentions "j'aime": 18
      Quoting: Jukesy
      So basically the plan is, ditch your two worst contracts, replace your 4th line wingers, and run it back?

      I mean sure. I suppose. That's something all right. It's not even a bad strategy it's just so like. Idk. Average....


      Tbf I wasn’t trying to go absolutely crazy, I’m not a flames fan and ironically they’re one of my least favorite teams so I didn’t want to attack their fan base by doing radical changes. But I’m smart enough to know whats best for them this off season lol
      29 mai 2022 à 5 h 4
      #7
      Démarrer sujet
      (ExiledSebi)
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2021
      Messages: 74
      Mentions "j'aime": 18
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      Monahan has already been reported to be oh pretty high interest. It definitely won't cost that much to move him, he actually probably returns slightly positive value assuming he is healthy. Lucic should not cost more than a 2nd to move


      I wish it was that easy but in a flat cap world any contract even psuedo-bad is gonna take a bit to trade away. We’ve seen quite a few trades where teams have had to trade away multiple seconds minimum to trade away contracts that didn’t seem too horrible on paper.
      theleano1 a aimé ceci.
      29 mai 2022 à 5 h 6
      #8
      Démarrer sujet
      (ExiledSebi)
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2021
      Messages: 74
      Mentions "j'aime": 18
      Quoting: Buffalove
      Sabres say maybe
      I can’t see us wanting Monahan, but maybe the 2nd & prospect are enough to get us to take him?


      I mean Sabres are the team with the most cap space going into free agency and they need to reach the cap floor. They already had to make the boychuck trade to accommodate for their lack of spending. Plus at the minimum monahan has the possibility to actually make an impact and resurrection his career.
      29 mai 2022 à 5 h 19
      #9
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: mai 2021
      Messages: 202
      Mentions "j'aime": 71
      Quoting: Sebi
      Tbf I wasn’t trying to go absolutely crazy, I’m not a flames fan and ironically they’re one of my least favorite teams so I didn’t want to attack their fan base by doing radical changes. But I’m smart enough to know whats best for them this off season lol


      I dont even think running it back is a bad plan. It's just...

      So. Boring... lmao

      Im not a flames fan either, but I live in Calgary so I wouldn't hate seeing them do well haha
      Sebi a aimé ceci.
      29 mai 2022 à 5 h 21
      #10
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 38,602
      Mentions "j'aime": 19,716
      Quoting: Sebi
      I wish it was that easy but in a flat cap world any contract even psuedo-bad is gonna take a bit to trade away. We’ve seen quite a few trades where teams have had to trade away multiple seconds minimum to trade away contracts that didn’t seem too horrible on paper.


      Lucic yes, but Monahan I disagree with. Teams skipped out on Tarasenko last year because injuries hurt his numbers and teams generally don't make the same mistake twice. Also Keith and Risto got very good returns considering they are roughly the same caliber players
      Sebi a aimé ceci.
      29 mai 2022 à 5 h 54
      #11
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juill. 2021
      Messages: 7,136
      Mentions "j'aime": 3,156
      Quoting: Sebi
      I mean Sabres are the team with the most cap space going into free agency and they need to reach the cap floor. They already had to make the boychuck trade to accommodate for their lack of spending. Plus at the minimum monahan has the possibility to actually make an impact and resurrection his career.


      There’s plenty of ways to get to the Cap floor, including the starting goalie we’re likely to go after in free agency

      And our forwards are pretty much set for next year already
      It’s a matter of whether or not we think the extra incentive to take on Monahan is worth holding back 1 of our young guys or not
      29 mai 2022 à 7 h 19
      #12
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: avr. 2020
      Messages: 5,715
      Mentions "j'aime": 4,783
      Quoting: Sebi
      I mean Sabres are the team with the most cap space going into free agency and they need to reach the cap floor. They already had to make the boychuck trade to accommodate for their lack of spending. Plus at the minimum monahan has the possibility to actually make an impact and resurrection his career.


      Yan is a interesting prospect, big boy, but he plays a side we are pretty loaded on, got any decent RD prospects
      29 mai 2022 à 9 h 12
      #13
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: août 2020
      Messages: 1,049
      Mentions "j'aime": 850
      Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
      Lucic yes, but Monahan I disagree with. Teams skipped out on Tarasenko last year because injuries hurt his numbers and teams generally don't make the same mistake twice. Also Keith and Risto got very good returns considering they are roughly the same caliber players


      It would not be the same mistake even if Monahan returns to form. Surgeries on both hips is a pretty significant and he has been overpaid for the last 3 years. Tarasenko was only overpaid for 2 and it was a shoulder injury. Not that close.
      29 mai 2022 à 10 h 1
      #14
      Avatar de l'utilisateur
      Rejoint: juin 2019
      Messages: 38,602
      Mentions "j'aime": 19,716
      Quoting: sabresparaavida
      It would not be the same mistake even if Monahan returns to form. Surgeries on both hips is a pretty significant and he has been overpaid for the last 3 years. Tarasenko was only overpaid for 2 and it was a shoulder injury. Not that close.


      Monahan was not "overpaid" 2 years ago, where did you get that conclusion from? He paced 56 points in 19/20 which is right around his career average (slightly under if you want to nitpick). Is a 55-65 point pace not pretty standard for a center of that contract range? Brayden Schenn, Sam Reinhart, Nico Hischier, Dylan Larkin, William Karlsson, Bo Horvat, etc. Only exceptions arpund there are MacKinnon and Scheifele, but its a pretty fair argument that they are underpaid.

      How is a hip surgery not as significant as a shoulder surgery? Both are major body limbs.
       
      Répondre
      To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
      Question:
      Options:
      Ajouter une option
      Soumettre le sondage