John gibson has been, at best, as good as mrazek has been the past 3 seasons

mrazek is toast

mrazek is toast

Over the last 3 seasons:

Goalie A: .904sv%
Goalie B: .905sv%

… A is Gibson, B is Mrazek and Mrazek is cheaper and can easily be bought out. Gibson is the most overrated player on this site and in the game. He’s not good, he’s a backup calibre goalie

now show the stats of the teams they were on. gibson was on one of the worst teams in the league. mrazek was on good playoff teams.

At the end of the day it comes down to stopping the puck for goalies - that’s their job. Stop blaming other factors and just do your job. Gibson doesn’t do his that well, that’s getting to be the oldest line I’ve heard on here

lol you cant ignore it. one guys job is harder than the others so of course that's going to effect the results.

Lol. Explain why Anthony Stolarz has a .917sv% behind the same defence that Gibson has but Gibson only has a .905sv% then

Gibson is overrated.

hes not a bad backup. kinda like campbell. you need a starter tho.

So you’re backup is better than your starter?

lol you think hes better than gibson

You’re the one that blamed Anaheim’s poor defence for Gibson’s numbers, but then can’t justify why Stolarz’s numbers are better behind the same team? But you still say that Gibson is a good goalie? I guess you’re saying that Stolarz is an even better goalie then..

This was literally you’re justification that I just called you out on. I’m sorry you can’t admit or accept that you’re wrong, but you are. Gibson is not good. Stats say he’s bad. Underlying metrics say he’s bad. Eye test says he’s bad. But DirtyDangle says he’s good so it must be true!

stolarz is just having a good season. gibson is the better goalie. tor needs a starter not another back up bandaid

If Gibson is better and you claim that the defence he plays behind is the only reason why he’s had poor numbers for 3 seasons in a row, then again how are Stolarz’s numbers better?

You can’t justify anything you’re saying. Gibson is overrated. He’s not good. Leafs are better off keep Campbell at a much lower cap hit than Gibson’s overpaid $6.4m per year. Sorry but you’re just wrong here.