Thanks for letting us know taisei and for returning in such a professional manner. I have notified your successor, NateElder, that you will now be his AGM.

Bump

C'est n'est pas très important haha. Tu ne doit pas voir les choix. Écrire qulle choix tu as dans ton description d'accord?

Whaaaaaaaat? How am I next on the priority list?

If Bo53Horvat isn't around, I would totally take the Minnesota GM spot unless PlNHL objects to it. I'll check with him.

Ok même les 2021?

Oui

Ok merci

As written in the agenda, GYR has not made his Dallas team...it's been 6 days now. We'll have to wait till 7 but, most likely we will have to find a new Dallas GM too...

I won't be leaving temporarily. I will come back as an agm sometime...whoever takes over will be permanent. No protection lists or anything.

Gotcha. Thanks for letting us know

Icegirl is next in line (assuming my AGM is still sleeping er working). Prolly not, just making sure no objections correct?

Hey guys, I'm not sure if this has been discussed before, but I have a proposal. Right before v2 launches, I think we should have votes to determine which GMs have done the best job. There would be different categories such as Best All-In team, Best Retool-on-the-fly team, Brightest Futureq, Biggest Real-Life Improvement, etc. We would pick which category we fall into, and any GMs not in that category can vote. I think it'd be a good way to acknowledge which teams have done really good jobs, no matter which direction they took their team in.

Thoughts?

I was thinking of the exact same thing ironically. This is something that I'd love to happen and think we should do it. Yet I have no clue when V2 will even start (or if it will start, there isn't a definitive answer yet) but I think we should do this sometime soon.

I don't think it really matters when we do it, as long as it happens. Sooner would be nicer. Is the BOG going to vote on doing this? I haven't paid a ton of attention to this thread so I'm not entirely sure how this works haha

Sure why not

1-0 of implementing krakowtiz's idea above, date TBD

Wait... Does that mean I'm next after Icegirl?

I'd have to check, I'm not sure

Order is
1) Bo53Horvat (but most likely he's not on so next is...)
2) Brock6Boeser
3) WhisperWhisper
4) TopCornerShot
5) DirtyDangles
6) taisei

Don't know if this is the right place to post this or not, but what are we going to do with players that have gone to the KHL in order to play in the Olympics (Nikita Nesterov, for example)? Do they get to stay on team's rosters or do they have to be removed?

I think they should be removed. Put Nesterov on LTIR for now...that's what STL did with Tryamkin

We don't have rights to Nesterov, was just using him as an example.

Same answer

That's not what I... Nes... Never mind, I get it

I had planned for all of that to be sorted when we go through and budget teams.
1. Players bought out IRL remain on the books unless also bought out in game (there will be another buyout opportunity prior to the beginning of the season).
2. Players who appear on your team in the form of buyout or retained salary that were not performed by the GM will be adjusted for.
3. Players who were bought out and disappeared from your team as a result, will be added back to your team.
4. Retired players should be removed once they announce retirement and are approved by the BOG (to make sure it is an actual announcement from a credible source, is reflected on capfriendly, and is not a rumor/speculation).
5. Players going to Europe should be changed to player rights once they sign a contract overseas and reinstated (at their new salary) if they return to an NHL club while you hold their rights. The rights have the same term as the length of their current contract or until they reach 27(? we'd have to verify, but I think that's right). If a GM does not wish to take that player at that salary, they may release the player to waivers instead (Again, upon BOG approval, and only after the signing/return of the player is confirmed).

There may be other situations I'm not thinking of at the moment, so mention them now if you think of any.

I like the idea but I think we should draft a more formal list of things to vote on/create more categories before we vote on anything. But definitely include Krakowitzs ideas in there as well.