Rejoint: août 2020
Messages: 3,892
Mentions "j'aime": 2,794
That Norris deal is right inline with the market. But why not a 3 year bridge? It offers more flexibility in the short term and I don’t see anybody on this roster needing another monster deal in that time other than Sanderson and Stutzle. Even then I think you could get away with giving Norris that deal since Brown, Hamonic, and Murray will be coming off the books and the cap will be going up.
I think the bigger question is whether the org will *actually* spend the money.