SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Off-season

Créé par: braisman
Équipe: 2022-23 Predators de Nashville
Date de création initiale: 25 mars 2022
Publié: 25 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
RFAANSCAP HIT
2950 000 $
31 500 000 $
31 250 000 $
77 000 000 $
UFAANSCAP HIT
88 750 000 $
Transactions
1.
OTT
  1. Johansen, Ryan
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
2.
3.
NSH
  1. Dadonov, Evgeni
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
4.
NSH
  1. Boeser, Brock [Droits de RFA]
VAN
  1. Fabbro, Dante
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
5.
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de NSH
Logo de LAK
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2023
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
2024
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
Logo de NSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2481 500 000 $74 035 309 $0 $345 000 $7 464 691 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Predators de Nashville
8 750 000 $8 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 8
Logo de Predators de Nashville
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 4
7 000 000 $7 000 000 $
AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Golden Knights de Vegas
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
AD, AG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 3
Logo de Sénateurs d'Ottawa
1 200 000 $1 200 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
2 857 143 $2 857 143 $
C, AD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance212 500 $$212K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Predators de Nashville
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
C, AG
RFA - 2
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
850 000 $850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
1 133 333 $1 133 333 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Predators de Nashville
9 059 000 $9 059 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Predators de Nashville
733 333 $733 333 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Kings de Los Angeles
3 150 000 $3 150 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
DG/DD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
950 000 $950 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Sharks de San Jose
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Predators de Nashville
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
25 mars 2022 à 23 h 9
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 8,174
Mentions "j'aime": 3,655
Sharks easily decline. Glass is a bust big time, rather have the other solid players
sharks_1999 a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2022 à 23 h 12
#2
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 981
Mentions "j'aime": 228
Glass was a bust with VGK and now with NSH + Kunin is worse than Balcers. Sharks easy decline that
25 mars 2022 à 23 h 15
#3
Amirov Forever
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2022
Messages: 6,616
Mentions "j'aime": 6,082
Why are the Sens paying for RJ? Canucks laugh at you
WhereArtTLuongo a aimé ceci.
25 mars 2022 à 23 h 23
#4
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,481
Mentions "j'aime": 25,380
Eeli Tolvanen is a youngster with a bright future. He's having as good a year as rookie Arthur Kaliyev, who's two years younger, but Tolvanen wouldn't play ahead of Alex Iafallo, Adrian Kempe or Trevor Moore, so we don't really have a need for him. And if we WERE going to trade for him, it wouldn't be our #2 RD that we'd be sending.
25 mars 2022 à 23 h 34
#5
Ballards Curse
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2017
Messages: 1,055
Mentions "j'aime": 271
OTT Blocks your number. Stop this
26 mars 2022 à 9 h 13
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Everyone except Vegas easily decline.
FunMustBeAlways a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2022 à 9 h 39
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,656
Mentions "j'aime": 5,239
Quoting: crankshaft
Everyone except Vegas easily decline.


Oddly, that't the one I see NSH having the most interest in. Maybe the Boeser proposal, but I don't see NSH being eager to move Fabbro, with the way Myers hasn't worked out and a lack of NHL ready RD prospects.

The SJS and OTT proposals are big downgrades for NSH. Selling low on Tolvanen like that doesn't happen if Fabbro doesn't get moved, and NSH isn't desperate for a replacement.
26 mars 2022 à 9 h 52
#8
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2020
Messages: 2,686
Mentions "j'aime": 1,219
Quoting: gmgb
Oddly, that't the one I see NSH having the most interest in. Maybe the Boeser proposal, but I don't see NSH being eager to move Fabbro, with the way Myers hasn't worked out and a lack of NHL ready RD prospects.

The SJS and OTT proposals are big downgrades for NSH. Selling low on Tolvanen like that doesn't happen if Fabbro doesn't get moved, and NSH isn't desperate for a replacement.


Then you underrate Balcers whom I think is better than Kunin. He's faster, plays PK, plays up and down the lineup. No point in SJ moving him unless it's a clear upgrade. Reimer alone is going to get a 2nd plus. Nieto can be had but I'm guessing he was a toss-in here. This is a terrible deal for SJ, plain and simple as Glass was a bust in Vegas, went to Nash for a change of scenery and is still a bust. Would be a major downgrade for SJ and it's simply not realistic. We easily decline.
gmgb a aimé ceci.
26 mars 2022 à 10 h 24
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2017
Messages: 7,656
Mentions "j'aime": 5,239
Quoting: crankshaft
Then you underrate Balcers whom I think is better than Kunin. He's faster, plays PK, plays up and down the lineup. No point in SJ moving him unless it's a clear upgrade. Reimer alone is going to get a 2nd plus. Nieto can be had but I'm guessing he was a toss-in here. This is a terrible deal for SJ, plain and simple as Glass was a bust in Vegas, went to Nash for a change of scenery and is still a bust. Would be a major downgrade for SJ and it's simply not realistic. We easily decline.


Thanks for providing a Sharks focused take on the proposal. Here's why I don't like it for NSH:

I like Balcers, but don't see him as a great fit for the Preds under Hynes. He lacks size and physicality, and I see him being a target on the ice in NSH. The Preds are the most physical team in the NHL, and since opponents can't easily step up to guys like Jeannot and Trenin, they'll likely focus their hits and rough stuff on Balcers, like they currently do with Carrier.

NSH has Ingram ready to be the backup next season, so they don't have a spot for Reimer. He'd just be an unnecessary cap hit to them.

Nieto is fine as a throw in depth piece, but like Balcers he's not big or physical. He doesn't have much value to the Preds.

The player here that NSH would place the highest value on is oddly enough the one the Sharks fans here are screaming is a bust. NSH deciding to keep Glass in the AHL all season isn't because they view him as a failure, but rather because they see a lot of potential there, and want to develop him properly. He's excelled with the Ads, and is still looked at as a significant part of NSH's future. Like the Sharks, NSH doesn't have the greatest prospect depth down the middle either. Aside from Glass and Svechkov (and Pärssinen, but he might easily wind up on the wing) there isn't much else for center prospects. They'd be loathe to move Glass, and none of the players coming from SJS here are incentive enough. They just don't fill any glaring needs the Preds have.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage