Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 69
Mentions "j'aime": 21
For starters the Rangers literally do not have the cap space to accommodate Kane next year (even at 50% retained) without being forced to cap dump in other areas. That would create a huge hole at 2C since they don't have one under contract. Then there's the fact that Kane barely moves the needle for the Rangers. A lot of his positive impact comes from the power play at this stage of his career and the Rangers quite literally do not need help in that department. Then there's the price you set which frankly the Rangers would laugh at. Rangers refused to trade Lafreniere in any package for Eichel, so why would they trade him for Kane? Othmann should be considered off limits too unless its in a package for a young cost controlled C, his potential to provide cheap scoring for 3 years of an ELC makes his value too great (and needed) for the Rangers. I doubt they would trade either of those two straight up for Kane, let alone together with even more assets.