SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Detroit Deadline

Créé par: Mystaes
Équipe: 2021-22 Red Wings de Detroit
Date de création initiale: 15 mars 2022
Publié: 15 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Could also acquire Petersson or Reilly in offseason for ~3rd round pick and trade Namestnikov for a pick somewhere instead
Transactions
1.
DET
  1. Pettersson, Marcus
Détails additionnels:
Pens offload one of their three LHD at ~4m to make room for other acquisitions and contracts and improve their middle six.
PIT
  1. Namestnikov, Vladislav (1 000 000 $ retained)
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (VGK)
2.
DET
  1. Monahan, Sean
  2. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Could also be offseason - Calgary dumps Monahan for other acquisitions or the big contracts in the offseason
CGY
3.
DET
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (NSH)
NSH
  1. Leddy, Nick (2 750 000 $ retained)
Détails additionnels:
Based on Manson getting two seconds worth, and Leddy being virtually the same as Manson based on Hockeyviz offensive and defensive impacts, Leddy retained should net a second.
4.
DET
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2022 (EDM)
Détails additionnels:
Returning depth vet
5.
DET
  1. Choix de 4e ronde en 2023 (CGY)
Détails additionnels:
Anywhere really. standard depth d move.
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de WSH
Logo de CGY
Logo de NSH
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de COL
Logo de DET
Logo de EDM
Logo de DET
2023
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de CGY
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
2024
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
Logo de DET
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $70 704 898 $0 $4 518 750 $10 795 102 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 625 000 $2 625 000 $
AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
6 100 000 $6 100 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance2 500 000 $$2M)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 375 000 $2 375 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Flames de Calgary
6 375 000 $6 375 000 $
C, AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 460 000 $1 460 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
894 167 $894 167 $ (Bonis de performance318 750 $$319K)
C
RFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
925 000 $925 000 $
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 100 000 $2 100 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
737 500 $737 500 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
863 333 $863 333 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 600 000 $3 600 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Penguins de Pittsburgh
4 025 175 $4 025 175 $
DG
UFA - 4
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
4 400 000 $4 400 000 $
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
G
UFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 000 000 $2 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
RFA - 2
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
1 350 000 $1 350 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
2 950 000 $2 950 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Red Wings de Detroit
825 000 $825 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
15 mars 2022 à 10 h 23
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,387
Mentions "j'aime": 11,761
I think Martinez would be a better add than Pettersson
15 mars 2022 à 10 h 25
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 436
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I think Martinez would be a better add than Pettersson


Martinez currently has nerve problems due to the laceration of his face that have held him out all season and would be an ongoing concern for any team acquiring him.

If he’s healthy sure.
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 10 h 26
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,387
Mentions "j'aime": 11,761
Quoting: Mystaes
Martinez currently has nerve problems due to the laceration of his face that have held him out all season and would be an ongoing concern for any team acquiring him.

If he’s healthy sure.


Wasn’t aware of all of that. Changes my view
15 mars 2022 à 10 h 52
#4
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2019
Messages: 690
Mentions "j'aime": 561
I was thinking about Monahan the other day. I would be in favour of this, we really need a 2C, and I think it's pretty obvious that Monahan needs a fresh start and has fallen down the Flames depth chart despite them having a very good season.

I'm not sure he could be had for free though, I think Calgary would still like something in return, but as a Detroit fan, I would take your proposal all day.
15 mars 2022 à 11 h 6
#5
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 62
Mentions "j'aime": 15
CGY doesn't give Mony away for free. There'd be other suitors that woudl easily pay at least a 2nd Rd Pick for him.
But... he does have a NTC and I imagine DET could be on that non-trade list of 10 teams.
Datsyukian et Wingsfan09 a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 11 h 10
#6
StevieY19!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,068
Mentions "j'aime": 690
Ya as disappointing Monahan has been I don't think he's a cap dump yet I think we'd have to pay a bit for him.
15 mars 2022 à 11 h 14
#7
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 436
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: JamCam
CGY doesn't give Mony away for free. There'd be other suitors that woudl easily pay at least a 2nd Rd Pick for him.
But... he does have a NTC and I imagine DET could be on that non-trade list of 10 teams.


They can be stuck with him then. I don’t think any gm is going to shell out assets for a guy who is overpayed by about 4m dollars (going off of the athletic hockey card market value here). Cap, especially in this environment, is a premium.

Mangiapane, Tkatchuk, And Gaudreau are all staring at new contracts and Calgary is going to want to shed cap space to make it happen. I suppose a different victim could be Lucic.
AnyoneButTheBruins a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 11 h 14
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 436
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: AnyoneButTheBruins
Ya as disappointing Monahan has been I don't think he's a cap dump yet I think we'd have to pay a bit for him.


Yeah his contract is about 4M more then his production value so if he’s not a dump I’m passing.
15 mars 2022 à 11 h 41
#9
StevieY19!!
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2019
Messages: 1,068
Mentions "j'aime": 690
Quoting: Mystaes
They can be stuck with him then. I don’t think any gm is going to shell out assets for a guy who is overpayed by about 4m dollars (going off of the athletic hockey card market value here). Cap, especially in this environment, is a premium.

Mangiapane, Tkatchuk, And Gaudreau are all staring at new contracts and Calgary is going to want to shed cap space to make it happen. I suppose a different victim could be Lucic.


Monahan would be easier to move as he is more productive. Yes he costs more but still. Lucic also has a full NMC and a M-NTC whereas Monahan is only a M-NTC.
15 mars 2022 à 12 h 0
#10
Datsyukian
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 445
Mentions "j'aime": 194
lol are you implying that Monahan is a cap dump? Are you also suggesting that Monahan is worth around $2M AAV?

Are you serious?
15 mars 2022 à 12 h 6
#11
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2017
Messages: 24,038
Mentions "j'aime": 7,746
I don't see Edmonton trading for Gagner. Some fans would love it but there's just no reason to bring Sammy back.
15 mars 2022 à 12 h 14
#12
Wingsfan09
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2019
Messages: 439
Mentions "j'aime": 152
I'd be very willing to shell out a 3rd for Monahan, and possibly a 2nd if that's what it takes. Is he overpaid? Yes, but he has also been very good not that long ago. Even if Monahan returns to a 40 pt player, he is still statistically better that what we would likely get from a 2nd/3rd. And if he returns to form, its a huge bonus. If not, its only 1 more year on his deal. We can afford it.
15 mars 2022 à 12 h 16
#13
Friedman for Norris
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: août 2021
Messages: 875
Mentions "j'aime": 190
Pens accept
15 mars 2022 à 12 h 20
#14
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 436
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: Datsyukian
lol are you implying that Monahan is a cap dump? Are you also suggesting that Monahan is worth around $2M AAV?

Are you serious?


His market value is about 2.5m AAV based on Dom’s model from the athletic. You normally don’t pay 6.4m to a guy with ~0.33ppg and not much else going for them.

Cap dumps aren’t always 0 production. The value of the contract compared to the value of the on ice product matter. Mark Staal was dumped with a 5.25M contract to the Wing’s for a second and he was still serviceable, just nowhere near 5m in value.
Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 12 h 22
#15
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 436
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: wingss
I'd be very willing to shell out a 3rd for Monahan, and possibly a 2nd if that's what it takes. Is he overpaid? Yes, but he has also been very good not that long ago. Even if Monahan returns to a 40 pt player, he is still statistically better that what we would likely get from a 2nd/3rd. And if he returns to form, its a huge bonus. If not, its only 1 more year on his deal. We can afford it.


If he’s not a dump we shouldn’t be spending assets to acquire 1 year of a UFA and help out a team in cap trouble. Cap is a premium asset and the picks could be used to get something with term. No need for a forward version of Leddy.
Billy12Bob a aimé ceci.
15 mars 2022 à 14 h 32
#16
Datsyukian
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 445
Mentions "j'aime": 194
Quoting: Mystaes
His market value is about 2.5m AAV based on Dom’s model from the athletic. You normally don’t pay 6.4m to a guy with ~0.33ppg and not much else going for them.

Cap dumps aren’t always 0 production. The value of the contract compared to the value of the on ice product matter. Mark Staal was dumped with a 5.25M contract to the Wing’s for a second and he was still serviceable, just nowhere near 5m in value.


You're comparing 35+ year old Marc Staal to 27 year old Sean Monahan....lol case closed.
15 mars 2022 à 15 h 53
#17
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2021
Messages: 436
Mentions "j'aime": 301
Quoting: Datsyukian
You're comparing 35+ year old Marc Staal to 27 year old Sean Monahan....lol case closed.


What matters isn’t the age it’s production. Both had 1 year left at large overvaluation. Monahan being 27 has nothing to do with it because he’s a ufa after next year - it’s not like he’s an asset with control.

Both were/are not remotely worth their contracts. Dumps also don’t have to be 30+. They just have to be underperforming to enough of an extent that offloading them for something shinier is preferable.

I also didn’t come up with the Monahan trade, it was reviewed as a relatively fair trade by the athletic on a recent “ who says no” article for Detroit. I think you overvalue Monahan for what he was and not what his post injury self is.
16 mars 2022 à 9 h 8
#18
Datsyukian
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2021
Messages: 445
Mentions "j'aime": 194
Quoting: Mystaes
What matters isn’t the age it’s production. Both had 1 year left at large overvaluation. Monahan being 27 has nothing to do with it because he’s a ufa after next year - it’s not like he’s an asset with control.

Both were/are not remotely worth their contracts. Dumps also don’t have to be 30+. They just have to be underperforming to enough of an extent that offloading them for something shinier is preferable.

I also didn’t come up with the Monahan trade, it was reviewed as a relatively fair trade by the athletic on a recent “ who says no” article for Detroit. I think you overvalue Monahan for what he was and not what his post injury self is.


He's a UFA in 2 years and can easily be extended - the notion that the Flames will just give him up for a pick as a dump is preposterous. The guy is a 6 OA pick with history of success in the league...he's had one down year after an injury.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage