SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Devils blockbuster

Créé par: Bruinsbeatz
Équipe: 2021-22 Bruins de Boston
Date de création initiale: 13 mars 2022
Publié: 13 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
LISTE DE RÉSERVEANSCAP HIT
3800 000 $
Transactions
1.
BOS
  1. Graves, Ryan
  2. Tatar, Tomas (2 250 000 $ retained)
  3. Zacha, Pavel
NJD
  1. Beecher, John
  2. DeBrusk, Jake
  3. Steen, Oskar
  4. Vaakanainen, Urho
  5. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (BOS)
  6. Choix de 2e ronde en 2023 (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (MIN)
Enfoui
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de BOS
Logo de CGY
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2023
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de MIN
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
2024
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
Logo de BOS
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2281 500 000 $79 977 341 $1 956 507 $125 000 $1 522 659 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 125 000 $6 125 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 875 000 $6 875 000 $
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
AG
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
2 250 000 $2 250 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
6 666 667 $6 666 667 $
AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 050 000 $1 050 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 100 000 $3 100 000 $
AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 800 000 $3 800 000 $
AG, C, AD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 750 000 $1 750 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
800 000 $800 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 687 500 $3 687 500 $
DG
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 900 000 $4 900 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de Devils du New Jersey
3 166 667 $3 166 667 $
DG
UFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
4 100 000 $4 100 000 $
DD
UFA - 6
Logo de Bruins de Boston
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance125 000 $$125K)
G
RFA - 2
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Bruins de Boston
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DG
UFA - 3
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Bruins de Boston
750 000 $750 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
725 000 $725 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Bruins de Boston
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
13 mars 2022 à 12 h 9
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2020
Messages: 2,766
Mentions "j'aime": 520
Minnesota won't trade for haula. He's reputation in Minnesota, lets just say is not good. Especially when he's not getting playing time
13 mars 2022 à 12 h 11
#2
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 632
Mentions "j'aime": 150
Quoting: Wildnochance
Minnesota won't trade for haula. He's reputation in Minnesota, lets just say is not good. Especially when he's not getting playing time


Anyteam that needs playoff depth doesn’t have to be the wild
13 mars 2022 à 12 h 13
#3
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Idk, they are all still young, but it seems like Boston is shifting a number of players who have not quite panned out the way they hoped for proven NHL talent. Looks lopsided to me.
Devil a aimé ceci.
13 mars 2022 à 12 h 20
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 632
Mentions "j'aime": 150
Quoting: Opie
Idk, they are all still young, but it seems like Boston is shifting a number of players who have not quite panned out the way they hoped for proven NHL talent. Looks lopsided to me.


I mean it sounds like your mainly talking about debrusk but he’s been playing a lot better. Vaak and Steen have played well every game they’ve been up it’s just Sweeney signs veterans who clog those guys from coming up. Beecher has third line center potential he doesn’t have the stats but his underlying numbers are great.
13 mars 2022 à 12 h 35
#5
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Quoting: Bruinsbeatz
I mean it sounds like your mainly talking about debrusk but he’s been playing a lot better. Vaak and Steen have played well every game they’ve been up it’s just Sweeney signs veterans who clog those guys from coming up. Beecher has third line center potential he doesn’t have the stats but his underlying numbers are great.


Like Steen, maybe he continues to fill out his game ... but Im just not a fan of Urho at all.

The difficult part is that It's just a basket of maybes & I'm just not sure NJ does that kind of trade now. If they trade these three guys, at least one has to yield an immediate contributor. They want to compete next season & losing three pieces : two middle wingers (one which provides center skills, if Hughes or Hischier miss time) and a second pair defenseman is too much unless they get at least one or maybe two players who can fill similar roles. Futures are fine for one, maybe two of them, but not all three. I do understand contract status is a negative from NJ side, but they would be putting next season in the can with this trade & Fitzgerald loses his job imo. Idk, I just dont think they would do it
13 mars 2022 à 12 h 42
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 632
Mentions "j'aime": 150
Quoting: Opie
Like Steen, maybe he continues to fill out his game ... but Im just not a fan of Urho at all.

The difficult part is that It's just a basket of maybes & I'm just not sure NJ does that kind of trade now. If they trade these three guys, at least one has to yield an immediate contributor. They want to compete next season & losing three pieces : two middle wingers (one which provides center skills, if Hughes or Hischier miss time) and a second pair defenseman is too much unless they get at least one or maybe two players who can fill similar roles. Futures are fine for one, maybe two of them, but not all three. I do understand contract status is a negative from NJ side, but they would be putting next season in the can with this trade & Fitzgerald loses his job imo. Idk, I just dont think they would do it


Debrusk and Vaak would contribute immediately. Vaak was playing 1st pair with Mcavoy but he’s hurt right now and he’ll definitely be in the lineup come playoffs unless a trade like this is made with a LD. Plus debrusk is allowed to negotiate a cheaper deal with Anyteam he is traded too, but maybe your right bruins really don’t have anyone else they can afford to give up in their starting lineup.
13 mars 2022 à 12 h 49
#7
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Quoting: Bruinsbeatz
Debrusk and Vaak would contribute immediately. Vaak was playing 1st pair with Mcavoy but he’s hurt right now and he’ll definitely be in the lineup come playoffs unless a trade like this is made with a LD. Plus debrusk is allowed to negotiate a cheaper deal with Anyteam he is traded too, but maybe your right bruins really don’t have anyone else they can afford to give up in their starting lineup.


I hear ya, but I just dont think Vaak is very good (just my opinion, no insult intended) & I have some doubts he'd fit NJ style of play. Additionally, NJ has plenty of LD high end prospects in the pipe that will fill in if/when Graves leaves. I just dont see a fit for Debrusk in NJ, they'd be better off with resigning Zacha & cap is really not an issue yet for Devs
13 mars 2022 à 12 h 51
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 632
Mentions "j'aime": 150
Quoting: Opie
I hear ya, but I just dont think Vaak is very good (just my opinion, no insult intended) & I have some doubts he'd fit NJ style of play. Additionally, NJ has plenty of LD high end prospects in the pipe that will fill in if/when Graves leaves. I just dont see a fit for Debrusk in NJ, they'd be better off with resigning Zacha & cap is really not an issue yet for Devs


Ya they aren’t great trading partners, just exploring ideas
13 mars 2022 à 12 h 53
#9
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,301
Mentions "j'aime": 19,601
What would be the offer for just Tatar and Zacha?

I don’t think Devils move Graves, will at least hang onto to him though the off-season when they can talk extension with him.
NJDevils1317 et Devil a aimé ceci.
13 mars 2022 à 12 h 55
#10
Opie
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 1,678
Mentions "j'aime": 654
Quoting: Bruinsbeatz
Ya they aren’t great trading partners, just exploring ideas


Fair, nbd that's why we are all here, gotta try some ideas ... I actually think they may be good trade partners on something smaller. Maybe one guy who can contribute in Boston now for a near prospect... its not impossible.
13 mars 2022 à 13 h 26
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2020
Messages: 632
Mentions "j'aime": 150
Quoting: NHLfan10506
What would be the offer for just Tatar and Zacha?

I don’t think Devils move Graves, will at least hang onto to him though the off-season when they can talk extension with him.


Honestly with the way debrusk is playing probably debrusk and a third because i don’t see Tatar having much value and there needs to be retained salary
13 mars 2022 à 13 h 28
#12
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2019
Messages: 43,301
Mentions "j'aime": 19,601
Quoting: Bruinsbeatz
Honestly with the way debrusk is playing probably debrusk and a third because i don’t see Tatar having much value and there needs to be retained salary

Doesn’t make a ton of sense for us.
NJDevils1317 et Devil a aimé ceci.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage