SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

canucks deadline

Créé par: majormoose007
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 7 mars 2022
Publié: 7 mars 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Choix de 6e ronde en 2022 (COL)
COL
  1. Chiasson, Alex
Détails additionnels:
get what you can
2.
VAN
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2023 (FLA)
FLA
  1. Hunt, Brad
Détails additionnels:
same with chiasson
3.
VAN
  1. Hájek, Libor
  2. Kravtsov, Vitali
  3. Lundkvist, Nils
  4. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (STL)
Détails additionnels:
*whoevers 2nd is highest

Boeser solves the goal scoring RW need for the Rangers now and for the future while giving up good assets in positions they already have locked down
NYR
  1. Boeser, Brock
Détails additionnels:
I really like Boesers goal scoring but if it comes down to Miller, Garland or Boeser i'd probably go with Boeser considering how important Miller is driving the play and the feistiness Garland brings to the table.
4.
VAN
  1. Rees, Jamieson
  2. Choix de 3e ronde en 2022 (CHI)
CAR
  1. Motte, Tyler
Détails additionnels:
I really like what Motte brings to the 4th line but if you can't resign him for under 2 million then you should get what you can for him. There are guys in the minors like Will Lockwood who can bring that speed and energy lost without Motte.
5.
VAN
  1. Bemström, Emil
  2. Choix de 4e ronde en 2022 (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Dickinson, Jason
Détails additionnels:
Dickinson is just not a good fit with this lineup. He can be a capable defensive 3C it just doesn't work in Vancouver.
6.
VAN
  1. Rittich, David
  2. Choix de 5e ronde en 2023 (NSH)
Détails additionnels:
Nashville upgrades in net with a veteran goalie
NSH
  1. Halák, Jaroslav
Détails additionnels:
Halaks 1.25 million bonus gets flipped to Arizona
7.
VAN
  1. Choix de 7e ronde en 2024 (TOR)
Détails additionnels:
*7th goes through if Sutter plays a game this season or resigns with TOR
Rachats de contrats
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de STL
Logo de WPG
Logo de CHI
Logo de VAN
Logo de CBJ
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de COL
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de NSH
Logo de VAN
Logo de FLA
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2381 500 000 $69 528 159 $648 780 $3 682 500 $11 971 841 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 250 000 $5 250 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Blue Jackets de Columbus
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance82 500 $$82K)
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
850 000 $850 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Predators de Nashville
1 250 000 $1 250 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 2

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
7 mars 2022 à 6 h 14
#1
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2021
Messages: 781
Mentions "j'aime": 269
cbj pass, we don't want him
Viqsi a aimé ceci.
7 mars 2022 à 6 h 47
#2
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,685
Mentions "j'aime": 3,488
Canes pass. That is too much for a fourth liner. A third would be one thing, but adding a prospect, and one that could get his shot in the next couple of seasons, no. Personally, the most I would be willing to pay would be a 4th, and I don’t think that the Canes would be in on him. He isn’t a top 6 LW, and he doesn’t help upgrade our dcore. We already have enough depth, and with the roster as it is now, Stepan gets a look before Motte would, so acquiring Motte would be a waste of assets.
7 mars 2022 à 8 h 5
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 19,559
Mentions "j'aime": 5,044
Big no. Rees has a better chance of becoming an impact player in the top 9 than Motte. Carolina's bottom 6 is very strong. Motte would be the 14th forward. No reason for him.
7 mars 2022 à 8 h 43
#4
matt
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 602
Mentions "j'aime": 220
Quoting: evelutions2
Canes pass. That is too much for a fourth liner. A third would be one thing, but adding a prospect, and one that could get his shot in the next couple of seasons, no. Personally, the most I would be willing to pay would be a 4th, and I don’t think that the Canes would be in on him. He isn’t a top 6 LW, and he doesn’t help upgrade our dcore. We already have enough depth, and with the roster as it is now, Stepan gets a look before Motte would, so acquiring Motte would be a waste of assets.


Hes a 3rd liner on VAN, scoring at a 17g pace and is a great on the PK. Cool if you dont want him but hes not some knuckle dragger 4th liner either.
7 mars 2022 à 10 h 22
#5
Lets Get Kraken
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: avr. 2021
Messages: 8,685
Mentions "j'aime": 3,488
Quoting: mbaer84
Hes a 3rd liner on VAN, scoring at a 17g pace and is a great on the PK. Cool if you dont want him but hes not some knuckle dragger 4th liner either.


A third liner on Vancouver. He wouldn’t even crack the Canes fourth line. So, at best, if he goes to Carolina, he would be on the fourth line. More likely he would be the 14th forward behind Stepan. It’s nothing against Motte personally, as I really like him, but he would not be a good fit for the Canes. Could he improve our already league leading PK even further, sure, but do we really need to acquire him for that, no. Canes likely acquire a defenseman at the deadline, with H. Lindholm being one of the leading candidates.
mbaer84 a aimé ceci.
7 mars 2022 à 13 h 0
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2017
Messages: 69
Mentions "j'aime": 21
Rangers definitely decline. That's too much for Boeser but even if it wasn't the Rangers aren't able to absorb his QO for next year, he'd basically be a pure rental for them.
GilgimeshGurpgork a aimé ceci.
8 mars 2022 à 21 h 6
#7
GilgimeshGurpgork
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2018
Messages: 299
Mentions "j'aime": 46
Quoting: mbaer84
Hes a 3rd liner on VAN, scoring at a 17g pace and is a great on the PK. Cool if you dont want him but hes not some knuckle dragger 4th liner either.


I dont watch Canucks games, but 1) how great is he considering Vancouver is the by far the worst PK team in the league 2) if he is as great as you say he is, would he be a worthwhile addition to CAR who have the best PK in the league?

As for the trade with the rangers. The package is a little too rich for a pending FA the rangers most likely won't be able to pay (Fox is due a 9 million $ raise next year and they dont have a 2C signed yet). If they do get a RW2 instead of using kakko, they'd probably prefer garland (which that package is closer to reality for) bc of that feistiness that the Rangers GM loves.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage