Nah we aren’t trading Petr until the offseason and Philly declines that you gotta add…. A lot more

No way Philly does that

Lol, why is Winnipeg adding to Comrie. He’s been great this year and is a hell of a lot cheaper! Comrie is .920 @ 750K. Mrazek .902 @ 3.8M.

No thanks.

ah yes, an utter lack of context. always good! Comrie has had 8 good games this year and Mrazek spent like half of his 7 getting hurt, playing hurt and coming back after getting hurt and his numbers have steadily improved since.
Career numbers are a little more enlightening Comrie 895, Mrazek 910.

The Jets aren't overpaying for an expensive backup that isn't an improvement on what they have.

Jets don't have the cap space for Mrazek once Ehlers returns from LTIR. Going past this season, Mrazek's cap hit is too rich as they have use whatever cap space available to fix the forward group.

which is fair for sure, but comparing save percentages between 7 and 8 games respectively is a pretty bad way to compare two goalies when the next game for either of them could drop or raise the total by 0.15

I wasn't comparing save percentages. Jets can't spend that kind of money on a backup, that is why Brossoit isn't the backup.

no, but the guy i was replying to was

Fair enough. Have fun. 😉

flyers hard pass

Your also forgetting the extra 3M of Mrazek salary that the Jets don’t have, especially costly for a guy that always seems to be hurt as you say. The room loves Comrie. He’s finally coming into his own and he loves it in Winnipeg.

And why can’t we compare save %s this year? Fans compare stats/players all the time and attribute down years in trades proposals and values all the time. Would you take Petry and his boat anchor of a contract over a lesser and younger player who’s having a good year who may, just may, be finally starting to click, just because Petry was the better player the last few years and he just so happens to be having a down year because he was playing hurt? Or would you be tentative and say “no, I think I’ll stick with the one having a good year who just happens to be almost 3 years younger”.

salary is a valid reason to make the trade, comparing save percentages over 7-8 games is not. It could literally take one bad game or one good game and narrow the gap significantly. The entire point was context and comparing them by save percentage lacked almost all context. One guy is a career 1B coming off some health luck and one is a career AHLer who has played great for like 3 of 8 starts and ok for another two.

When one makes almost 5 times as much, signed longer, and happens to have the worse save percentage, you can see why eyebrows are raised.

which one has been a starter in the NHL and which one has been a bad AHL goalie?

So, you have no argument other than Mrazek has been barely passable in his past and is terrible now and only costs 5 times as much and may become barely passable again if he gets lucky? 😆

no, my argument is that one is a guy who has shown he can be a starter and is currently playing his way back into form while the other is an AHLer who had 5 good games in his nhl career. It's pretty obvious

Oh okay. It just sounds like you're grasping at straws and trying to live in the past because in our current reality Comrie has passed Mrazek in skill and is now the better goalie and far cheaper to boot and you have nothing logical, rational or unbiased to dispute that.