SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Scorched Earth

Créé par: ragger_lord
Équipe: 2021-22 Canucks de Vancouver
Date de création initiale: 31 janv. 2022
Publié: 31 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
This leavs the Canucks 5 picks in the first 2 rounds as well as 3 extra prospects.

Everyone but Petey,Bo,Hughes, and Demko are for sale.

The offseason to do list would be finding a way to move Pearson and Dickinson without spending assets as well as trying to money puck some signings.
Transactions
1.
VAN
  1. Kravtsov, Vitali
  2. Schneider, Braden
  3. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (NYR)
Détails additionnels:
Everyone's see this proposal. Some like it some don't but that's the ask
NYR
  1. Miller, J.T. (2 600 000 $ retained)
2.
VAN
  1. Zellweger, Olen
  2. Choix de 1e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
  3. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (ANA)
Détails additionnels:
Van gets draft capital and a solid D prospect
ANA
  1. Boeser, Brock
Détails additionnels:
A Brock trade is tough.

Ana gets a top 6 winger to help for their playoff push, who they will also be able to re sign long term.
3.
VAN
  1. Choix de 2e ronde en 2022 (TOR)
TOR
  1. Motte, Tyler (400 000 $ retained)
  2. Schenn, Luke
Détails additionnels:
Motte and Schenn are both good depth guys. Together are they worth a second?
4.
VAN
  1. Choix de 3e ronde en 2023 (PIT)
PIT
  1. Halák, Jaroslav
Détails additionnels:
To anyone needing a goalie - if he will waive
Rachats de contrats
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
Frais appliqués
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de VAN
Logo de NYR
Logo de ANA
Logo de ANA
Logo de TOR
Logo de WPG
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2023
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de PIT
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
2024
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
Logo de VAN
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
2081 500 000 $66 810 659 $648 780 $1 050 000 $14 689 341 $

Formation

Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 250 000 $3 250 000 $
AG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 125 000 $4 125 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
891 667 $891 667 $ (Bonis de performance200 000 $$200K)
AG, AD
RFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
4 950 000 $4 950 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 350 000 $7 350 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
925 000 $925 000 $ (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AD, AG
RFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 650 000 $2 650 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
725 000 $725 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
AD
UFA - 1
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 850 000 $7 850 000 $
DG
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
6 000 000 $6 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
5 000 000 $5 000 000 $
G
UFA - 5
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
7 260 000 $7 260 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
800 000 $800 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 2
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 4
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 500 000 $3 500 000 $
AG, AD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
3 000 000 $3 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
1 125 000 $1 125 000 $
AD, C
UFA - 1
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
762 500 $762 500 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Équipe de réserve
Logo de Canucks de Vancouver
750 000 $750 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance850 000 $$850K)
AG, AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Rangers de New York
925 000 $925 000 $ (0 $$00 $$0) (Bonis de performance400 000 $$400K)
DD
RFA - 3
Logo de Ducks d'Anaheim
897 500 $897 500 $ (0 $$00 $$0)
DG
RFA - 5

Unités spéciales

Avantage numérique 1
 
 
 
 

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
31 janv. 2022 à 13 h 44
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,567
Mentions "j'aime": 11,949
I don’t know how I feel about a 1st a 2nd AND Zellweger
ragger_lord a aimé ceci.
31 janv. 2022 à 13 h 45
#2
Démarrer sujet
Nuck Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 742
Mentions "j'aime": 327
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I don’t know how I feel about a 1st a 2nd AND Zellweger


I was wondering how Ducks fans would feel about that. Not sure on Z's value but he has looked impressive.

Would dropping the second make it better? Assuming the first will be in the early twenties/late teens
31 janv. 2022 à 13 h 57
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,567
Mentions "j'aime": 11,949
Quoting: ragger_lord
I was wondering how Ducks fans would feel about that. Not sure on Z's value but he has looked impressive.

Would dropping the second make it better? Assuming the first will be in the early twenties/late teens


I think for me at least it’s both a 1st and Zellweger being in together
31 janv. 2022 à 14 h 7
#4
Démarrer sujet
Nuck Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 742
Mentions "j'aime": 327
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I think for me at least it’s both a 1st and Zellweger being in together


Fair enough.

It's there another prospect you would think to replace him with?

I don't know if I would want the Canucks to move Boeser for just Zellweger +2nd (that's a lot of faith in one pprospect) or a first + second (your first will be too low for that imo)
31 janv. 2022 à 14 h 16
#5
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 40,499
Mentions "j'aime": 25,389
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I don’t know how I feel about a 1st a 2nd AND Zellweger


Well, to begin with, I don't see LD as a position of priority for the Canucks. Both Hughes and OEL are signed through 2026-2027 (i.e., five more years), which would seem to put a damper on Zellweger's development chances. Meanwhile, Zellweger is our #1 LD prospect. (If Vancouver really does want an LD prospect, I'd feel fine about giving them Jackson LaCombe or Henry Thrun.) And I agree with you about the first and second, especially in the same draft year.

I think Vancouver might be interested more in forward help. My idea would be the 2022 first, Max Jones or Sam Steel, and perhaps another prospect, like maybe even Brayden Tracey (but not Jacob Perreault or Sasha Pastujov).
GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
31 janv. 2022 à 14 h 39
#6
Démarrer sujet
Nuck Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: sept. 2020
Messages: 742
Mentions "j'aime": 327
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Well, to begin with, I don't see LD as a position of priority for the Canucks. Both Hughes and OEL are signed through 2026-2027 (i.e., five more years), which would seem to put a damper on Zellweger's development chances. Meanwhile, Zellweger is our #1 LD prospect. (If Vancouver really does want an LD prospect, I'd feel fine about giving them Jackson LaCombe or Henry Thrun.) And I agree with you about the first and second, especially in the same draft year.

I think Vancouver might be interested more in forward help. My idea would be the 2022 first, Max Jones or Sam Steel, and perhaps another prospect, like maybe even Brayden Tracey (but not Jacob Perreault or Sasha Pastujov).


I'm not a fan of Steel/Jones tbh. At their age I would be looking for more production.

A combination of the prospects listed would be more appealing
31 janv. 2022 à 14 h 40
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 15,567
Mentions "j'aime": 11,949
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Well, to begin with, I don't see LD as a position of priority for the Canucks. Both Hughes and OEL are signed through 2026-2027 (i.e., five more years), which would seem to put a damper on Zellweger's development chances. Meanwhile, Zellweger is our #1 LD prospect. (If Vancouver really does want an LD prospect, I'd feel fine about giving them Jackson LaCombe or Henry Thrun.) And I agree with you about the first and second, especially in the same draft year.

I think Vancouver might be interested more in forward help. My idea would be the 2022 first, Max Jones or Sam Steel, and perhaps another prospect, like maybe even Brayden Tracey (but not Jacob Perreault or Sasha Pastujov).


Would you do that? I think I would
OldNYIfan a aimé ceci.
31 janv. 2022 à 14 h 41
#8
Lenny7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: janv. 2017
Messages: 13,291
Mentions "j'aime": 11,051
Quoting: OldNYIfan
Well, to begin with, I don't see LD as a position of priority for the Canucks. Both Hughes and OEL are signed through 2026-2027 (i.e., five more years), which would seem to put a damper on Zellweger's development chances. Meanwhile, Zellweger is our #1 LD prospect. (If Vancouver really does want an LD prospect, I'd feel fine about giving them Jackson LaCombe or Henry Thrun.) And I agree with you about the first and second, especially in the same draft year.

I think Vancouver might be interested more in forward help. My idea would be the 2022 first, Max Jones or Sam Steel, and perhaps another prospect, like maybe even Brayden Tracey (but not Jacob Perreault or Sasha Pastujov).


Honestly, tried to think up what I'd offer, but everything that I'd consider doesn't get it done anyway, especially in their own division. Honestly, I don't think the OP is far off in his asking price, though I think the assets would be spread out a bit more (Move one of the picks to 2023?). Regardless, I'm not into it.

I guess I'm sitting here being like "Why not keep what it would cost, and just go hard on a guy like Gaudreau, Forsberg, or even try and steal Hertl in UFA?". Up and coming team in SoCal, with a boatload of cap space. Might be a biased Ducks fan thing to say, but that seems like a decent spot to sign, no? Even someone like Palat would on a 3 year deal would be a decent addition (I'd say Kadri for 4 years, but that guy is gonna get paiiiiiid!).

Edit: CC- @generallandro
OldNYIfan et GeneralLandro a aimé ceci.
31 janv. 2022 à 15 h 17
#9
AN "ORIGINAL SIX"
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2016
Messages: 1,763
Mentions "j'aime": 183
Quoting: GeneralLandro
I don’t know how I feel about a 1st a 2nd AND Zellweger


How about Benoit, Andersson and a first?
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage