SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Mid-Season Report Cards 2021-22

Créé par: NoVaSpartan
Équipe: 2021-22 Capitals de Washington
Date de création initiale: 26 janv. 2022
Publié: 27 janv. 2022
Mode - plafond salarial: Basique
Description
Saw this from a Blues fan (don't remember who, sorry) and thought I would do one for DC.

Top of the Grade is closest to the next letter grade, and the bottom is almost the next grade down.
Signatures de joueurs autonomes
CRÉÉANSCAP HIT
Grade A, Excelling
11 000 000 $
Grade B, Good
11 000 000 $
Grade C, Mediocre
11 000 000 $
Grade D, Bad
11 000 000 $
Grade F, Awful
11 000 000 $
Not Eligible, Not Enough Games
11 000 000 $
Samsonov, Ilya
11 000 000 $
Vanecek, Vitek
11 000 000 $
Fucale, Zachary
11 000 000 $
Grade Z, SEND TO THE SUN
11 000 000 $
Mr Clean, Blaine Forsythe
11 000 000 $
Rachats de contrats
Repêchage1e ronde2e ronde3e ronde4e ronde5e ronde6e ronde7e ronde
2022
Logo de WSH
Logo de WPG
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2023
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
2024
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
Logo de WSH
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3481 500 000 $80 816 262 $472 927 $297 500 $683 738 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Grade A, Excelling
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Grade B, Good
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Grade C, Mediocre
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 500 000 $9 500 000 $
AG
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
863 333 $863 333 $
AG, C
RFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
3 900 000 $3 900 000 $
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 166 667 $5 166 667 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de Capitals de Washington
725 000 $725 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 275 000 $1 275 000 $
DG
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
1 500 000 $1 500 000 $
AD, AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
5 750 000 $5 750 000 $
AD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
DG/DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
789 167 $789 167 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
AD, AG, C
UFA - 3
Fucale, Zachary
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
842 500 $842 500 $ (Bonis de performance32 500 $$32K)
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
791 667 $791 667 $ (Bonis de performance132 500 $$132K)
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Vanecek, Vitek
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
950 000 $950 000 $
DD
UFA - 2
Samsonov, Ilya
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
750 000 $750 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Grade D, Bad
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Grade F, Awful
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
4 000 000 $4 000 000 $
DD
UFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
8 000 000 $8 000 000 $
DD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 415 000 $2 415 000 $
C
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 750 000 $2 750 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de Capitals de Washington
900 000 $900 000 $
DG
RFA - 1
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 500 000 $2 500 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Laissés de côtéListe des blessés (IR)Liste des blessés à long terme (LTIR)
Not Eligible, Not Enough Games
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Grade Z, SEND TO THE SUN
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
2 850 000 $2 850 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 3
Mr Clean, Blaine Forsythe
1 000 000 $1 000 000 $
Logo de Capitals de Washington
9 200 000 $9 200 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
27 janv. 2022 à 8 h 39
#1
Tintin over 1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 15,929
Mentions "j'aime": 10,166
I wouldn’t say our goaltending has been good. I would say it’s been mediocre. Hathaway just need to stop taking bad penalties. Can you put the powerplay as awful
27 janv. 2022 à 8 h 40
#2
Tintin over 1122
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 15,929
Mentions "j'aime": 10,166
I’m so proud of Martin fer. Dude has been bailing out Carlson all season long
NoVaSpartan a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2022 à 8 h 43
#3
Démarrer sujet
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,296
Mentions "j'aime": 5,742
Quoting: capsfan2121
I wouldn’t say our goaltending has been good. I would say it’s been mediocre. Hathaway just need to stop taking bad penalties. Can you put the powerplay as awful


I'm giving them the benefit of having some horrid play in front of them recently. Giving up 12 shots in the first 10 minutes of the San Jose game last night kind of epitomizes the struggles as of recent. Goaltending just keeps getting the short end of the stick with these games.

I'm not sure what penalties Hath takes (but I'm not really paying attention so I'm not really sure), but I think his play has been pretty good this year, I especially liked his stint on the 1nd line, and I think he has done enough to be a B Grade.

Mr Clean can get his own Category.
capsfan2121 a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2022 à 9 h 10
#4
Hop on the Slaftrain
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2019
Messages: 16,172
Mentions "j'aime": 20,495
Pretty cool idea. Thanks for this
27 janv. 2022 à 9 h 43
#5
Icedragon4405
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 453
I would move Carlson and Sheary to C and put Schultz in F
27 janv. 2022 à 10 h 19
#6
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2019
Messages: 1,727
Mentions "j'aime": 918
Why has Carlson been so awful this year? I assume it’s a defensive issue and not an offensive issue?
27 janv. 2022 à 10 h 31
#7
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2018
Messages: 1,671
Mentions "j'aime": 875
At some point we have to question if Forsythe has some blackmail over Ted or GMBM because there's literally no reason this dude should still be employed.
27 janv. 2022 à 10 h 39
#8
Démarrer sujet
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,296
Mentions "j'aime": 5,742
Quoting: Icedragon4405
I would move Carlson and Sheary to C and put Schultz in F


I’ve been impressed with Sheary this year. I think the sorting for B was wrong since he should be much closer to C than he his, but I think he’s been good enough for now to squeak into a B. I

might be a bit too harsh on Carlson, but D or F is where I think he belongs. His offense feels like it’s lacking a bit from prior years, but it’s mostly due to turning the puck over quite a lot in bad spots, and ending up out of position too often for my liking.

I debated having Schultz between D and F but I think he’s gotten a bit too much hate. He’s been the unfortunate one on the D to not have a constant linemate, being shuffled around with Irwin, TVR, Cholo, freaking Kempny at one point. I don’t blame him for looking a bit worse, but I did like him on the 1PP during Carlson’s absence, so I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt for now. Could change quickly though.
27 janv. 2022 à 10 h 42
#9
Démarrer sujet
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,296
Mentions "j'aime": 5,742
Quoting: Florida_Man_Maroon
Why has Carlson been so awful this year? I assume it’s a defensive issue and not an offensive issue?


From my point of view, he has a lot of bad turnovers and has a decent amount of moments where I find myself cringing at his play. Seems worse when I watch him in person.
Florida_Man_Maroon a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2022 à 10 h 43
#10
Démarrer sujet
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,296
Mentions "j'aime": 5,742
Quoting: staytru20
At some point we have to question if Forsythe has some blackmail over Ted or GMBM because there's literally no reason this dude should still be employed.


He must know where the bodies are hidden.
27 janv. 2022 à 10 h 47
#11
Démarrer sujet
Craig Laughlin Fan
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: nov. 2019
Messages: 5,296
Mentions "j'aime": 5,742
Quoting: SevenLeg
Pretty cool idea. Thanks for this


Thanks, but not my idea. Got it from @A_k and his Blues report cards
A_K a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2022 à 11 h 35
#12
Lets Go Blues
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2016
Messages: 6,774
Mentions "j'aime": 4,332
Quoting: NoVaSpartan
Thanks, but not my idea. Got it from A_k and his Blues report cards


I need to add guys that need to be sent to the sun to the Blues one *sideeyes Marco Scandella*
NoVaSpartan a aimé ceci.
27 janv. 2022 à 11 h 36
#13
Icedragon4405
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 1,765
Mentions "j'aime": 453
Quoting: NoVaSpartan
I’ve been impressed with Sheary this year. I think the sorting for B was wrong since he should be much closer to C than he his, but I think he’s been good enough for now to squeak into a B. I

might be a bit too harsh on Carlson, but D or F is where I think he belongs. His offense feels like it’s lacking a bit from prior years, but it’s mostly due to turning the puck over quite a lot in bad spots, and ending up out of position too often for my liking.

I debated having Schultz between D and F but I think he’s gotten a bit too much hate. He’s been the unfortunate one on the D to not have a constant linemate, being shuffled around with Irwin, TVR, Cholo, freaking Kempny at one point. I don’t blame him for looking a bit worse, but I did like him on the 1PP during Carlson’s absence, so I’m giving him the benefit of the doubt for now. Could change quickly though.


My one problem with Schultz and Carlson being there is that Schultz is not nearly as good as Carlson, Carlson has always been bad defensively and he is still putting up good numbers this year that’s why I would put him in C
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Soumettre le sondage