Forums/Armchair-GM

deadline with depth shown

Créé par: TMLBRIAN
Date de création initiale: 14 janv. 2022
Publié: 18 janv. 2022
Équipe: 2021-22 Maple Leafs de Toronto
Explications
Campbell Extends 5 x 5 before the Leafs make the Mrazek for Fleury trade.

Chara for defensive depth, size, experience.

JT Miller will cost ALOT half retained for this year and next. He would be a great option for left wing or a centre spot if one of our centres go down to injury. Bunting is on the 4th line here but the lines would change a lot.

I really like this team for this year and next.
Transactions
1.
TOR
  1. Fleury, Marc-André (3 500 000 $ retained)
CHI
  1. Mrázek, Petr
  2. Der-Arguchintsev, Semyon
  3. 2023 2e round pick (TOR)
2.
TOR
  1. Chara, Zdeno
NYI
  1. 2023 3e round pick (TOR)
3.
TOR
  1. Miller, J.T. (2 625 000 $ retained)
  2. 2022 4e round pick (VAN)
VAN
  1. Ritchie, Nick
  2. Niemelä, Topi [Liste de réserve]
  3. Robertson, Nicholas
  4. 2022 1e round pick (TOR)
  5. 2024 3e round pick (TOR)
Transactions impliquant une retenue de salaire
  • Phil Kessel: 1 200 000 $ (15%)
ANNÉE DE REPÊCHAGERONDE 1RONDE 2RONDE 3RONDE 4RONDE 5RONDE 6RONDE 7
2022
Logo de TOR
Logo de VAN
Logo de TOR
2023
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
2024
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
Logo de TOR
TAILLE DE LA FORMATIONPLAFOND SALARIALCAP HITEXCÉDENTS Info-bulleBONISESPACE SOUS LE PLAFOND SALARIAL
3181 500 000 $85 667 283 $0 $1 150 000 $-4 167 283 $
Ailier gaucheCentreAilier droit
Logo de VAN
Miller, J.T.
2 625 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de TOR
Matthews, Auston
11 640 250 $
C
UFA - 3
Logo de TOR
Marner, Mitchell
10 903 000 $
AD
UFA - 4
Logo de TOR
Kerfoot, Alexander
3 500 000 $
AG, C
UFA - 2
Logo de TOR
Tavares, John
11 000 000 $
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo de TOR
Nylander, William
6 962 366 $
AD, AG
UFA - 3
Logo de TOR
Mikheyev, Ilya
1 645 000 $
AG, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Kämpf, David
1 500 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 2
Logo de TOR
Kase, Ondrej
1 250 000 $
AD
RFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Bunting, Michael
950 000 $
AG
UFA - 2
Logo de TOR
Spezza, Jason
750 000 $
C, AD
UFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Simmonds, Wayne
900 000 $
AD, AG
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de TOR
Clifford, Kyle
1 000 000 $
AG
UFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Engvall, Pierre
1 250 000 $
AG, C
RFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Anderson, Joey
750 000 $
AD
RFA - 2
Logo de TOR
Seney, Brett
750 000 $
C, AG
UFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Steeves, Alex
834 167 $
C
RFA - 3
Défenseur gaucherDéfenseur droitierGardien de but
Logo de TOR
Rielly, Morgan
5 000 000 $
DG
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Brodie, TJ
5 000 000 $
DG/DD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de TOR
Campbell, Jack
1 650 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Muzzin, Jake
5 625 000 $
DG
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo de TOR
Holl, Justin
2 000 000 $
DD
NTC
UFA - 2
Logo de CHI
Fleury, Marc-André
0 $
G
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Sandin, Rasmus
894 167 $
DG/DD
RFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Dermott, Travis
1 500 000 $
DG/DD
RFA - 2
Logo de TOR
Hutchinson, Michael
725 000 $
G
UFA - 1
Logo de NYI
Chara, Zdeno
750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Liljegren, Timothy
863 333 $
DD
RFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Källgren, Erik
750 000 $
G
RFA - 2
Logo de TOR
Dahlström, Carl
750 000 $
DG
UFA - 1
Logo de TOR
Biega, Alex
750 000 $
DD
UFA - 1

Code d'intégration

  • Pour afficher cette équipe sur un autre site Web ou blog, ajoutez ce iFrame à la page appropriée
  • Personnalisez les dimensions dans le code IFrame ci-dessous pour adapter votre site de manière appropriée. Minimum recommandé: 400px.

Texte intégré

Cliquer pour surligner
18 janv. à 15 h 18
#1
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: déc. 2019
Messages: 523
Mentions "j'aime": 60
no way the leafs give up niemela and robertson for miller
18 janv. à 15 h 20
#2
Banni
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 24,997
Mentions "j'aime": 7,855
I wouldn't do any of this.
18 janv. à 15 h 25
#3
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,019
Mentions "j'aime": 1,366
Canucks can get more particularly if they are retaining salary
18 janv. à 15 h 29
#4
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,220
Mentions "j'aime": 536
Quoting: sedin33
Canucks can get more particularly if they are retaining salary


1st, and 2 of the Leafs 3 best prospects? Robertson and Niemela are both legit prospects.
18 janv. à 15 h 29
#5
NoWah49
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: févr. 2018
Messages: 3,767
Mentions "j'aime": 1,126
losing Niemela hurts but it might be worth it
18 janv. à 15 h 34
#6
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,220
Mentions "j'aime": 536
Quoting: NoWah49
losing Niemela hurts but it might be worth it


definitely. that package to vancouver hurts but 2 years of adding miller at that cap hit with our core would be HUGE for a potential cup. This is an all in type of deal.
NoWah49 a aimé ceci.
18 janv. à 15 h 42
#7
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,228
Chicago declines, there are a few teams that might be interested in bringing Fleury in that wouldn't ask Chicago to take a cap dump and would likely move a 1st rounder in a bidding war.
18 janv. à 15 h 46
#8
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,220
Mentions "j'aime": 536
Quoting: NickC1988
Chicago declines, there are a few teams that might be interested in bringing Fleury in that wouldn't ask Chicago to take a cap dump and would likely move a 1st rounder in a bidding war.


Mrazek is a good goalie and is definitely worth his cap hit. He just has had injury issues. The Leafs only trade him for cap flexibility next year to resign Campbell. He could be a good Goalie for Chicago for the next 2 years. 2nd and a mediocre prospect + Mrazek is definitely worth it. But if you guys can get a 1st, then that would be a good option also.

Fleury half retained was my number one choice this past off season. I thought it made too much sense. But here we are....
18 janv. à 15 h 51
#9
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,228
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Mrazek is a good goalie and is definitely worth his cap hit. He just has had injury issues. The Leafs only trade him for cap flexibility next year to resign Campbell. He could be a good Goalie for Chicago for the next 2 years. 2nd and a mediocre prospect + Mrazek is definitely worth it. But if you guys can get a 1st, then that would be a good option also.

Fleury half retained was my number one choice this past off season. I thought it made too much sense. But here we are....


Mrazek's contract just isn't appealing, there are so many options for meddling goaltenders than him that wouldn't cost that much. His injury history has also hindered his play and I don't think Chicago is looking to do any team a favor/take a chance on a player like that. There's really nothing stopping Chicago from offering Campbell $6M+ a year next season aside from themselves.
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
18 janv. à 15 h 54
#10
Leafs 4 Lyfe
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mars 2021
Messages: 873
Mentions "j'aime": 127
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
1st, and 2 of the Leafs 3 best prospects? Robertson and Niemela are both legit prospects.


also taking back a cap hit in this deal
18 janv. à 16 h 1
#11
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,220
Mentions "j'aime": 536
Quoting: Juggin_Pav
also taking back a cap hit in this deal


Definitely. Ritchie has not lived up to 2.5m either. And his salary is actually 3.3m next year. So between Miller being Miller, the retention and then taking Ritchie as salary back, that's why the Leafs make such a big package. 1st (probably a weak first), Robertson or Amirov (both a level forward prospects), Niemela (a level defensive prospect). Those are some nice pieces. I am sure other teams would make big offers also. Like if Minni decides to part from Rossi or Boldy things could get interesting there.
18 janv. à 16 h 20
#12
Painsince67
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 172
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Quoting: NickC1988
Mrazek's contract just isn't appealing, there are so many options for meddling goaltenders than him that wouldn't cost that much. His injury history has also hindered his play and I don't think Chicago is looking to do any team a favor/take a chance on a player like that. There's really nothing stopping Chicago from offering Campbell $6M+ a year next season aside from themselves.


What's stopping Chicago from offering Campbell $6M+ is Seth Jone's extension kicking in, Dach needing a new contract, and paying Toews and Kane a combined $21M
18 janv. à 16 h 30
#13
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,220
Mentions "j'aime": 536
Quoting: kingjrb92
What's stopping Chicago from offering Campbell $6M+ is Seth Jone's extension kicking in, Dach needing a new contract, and paying Toews and Kane a combined $21M


Quoting: NickC1988
Mrazek's contract just isn't appealing, there are so many options for meddling goaltenders than him that wouldn't cost that much. His injury history has also hindered his play and I don't think Chicago is looking to do any team a favor/take a chance on a player like that. There's really nothing stopping Chicago from offering Campbell $6M+ a year next season aside from themselves.


Also, Campbell isn't guarenteed to make it to the UFA Market. In this trade scenario, the Leafs lock him up now, and then make the trade for Fleury.
18 janv. à 16 h 31
#14
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,228
Quoting: kingjrb92
What's stopping Chicago from offering Campbell $6M+ is Seth Jone's extension kicking in, Dach needing a new contract, and paying Toews and Kane a combined $21M


Dach's next deal will barely be over $2M at the current clip he's on. The hawks could certainly afford Campbell. Both Toews and Kane have a year left on their deals and I'd expect both of them to take pay cuts (Also thinking it's possible Toews retires), so there's really no long term cap hits asides from Jones' extension.
18 janv. à 16 h 32
#15
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,228
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Also, Campbell isn't guarenteed to make it to the UFA Market. In this trade scenario, the Leafs lock him up now, and then make the trade for Fleury.


Again, there's no reason for Chicago to help TOR out with this trade. Toronto would have to add significantly to make it work.
18 janv. à 16 h 35
#16
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,220
Mentions "j'aime": 536
Quoting: NickC1988
Again, there's no reason for Chicago to help TOR out with this trade. Toronto would have to add significantly to make it work.


I think this is a good deal for Chicago also. But if they can get better, they should go for it. I see this as a Win Win trade. And what do you mean by "Significantly"? How much are you expecting to get for him?
18 janv. à 16 h 42
#17
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,228
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
I think this is a good deal for Chicago also. But if they can get better, they should go for it. I see this as a Win Win trade. And what do you mean by "Significantly"? How much are you expecting to get for him?


Retention on a starting goalie and a cap dump (with 2 additional years) starts with a 1st round pick, and likely a 3rd or B prospect. I don't think it makes sense for Chicago to trade him to TOR when they could move him to Pittsburgh or Edmonton and get a better result.
Sign_em_up000000 a aimé ceci.
18 janv. à 16 h 50
#18
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,220
Mentions "j'aime": 536
Quoting: NickC1988
Retention on a starting goalie and a cap dump (with 2 additional years) starts with a 1st round pick, and likely a 3rd or B prospect. I don't think it makes sense for Chicago to trade him to TOR when they could move him to Pittsburgh or Edmonton and get a better result.


Okay, basically my package but a 1st instead of a 2nd. I offered a b prospect and a 2nd. Thanks!
18 janv. à 16 h 52
#19
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juill. 2018
Messages: 3,019
Mentions "j'aime": 1,366
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
1st, and 2 of the Leafs 3 best prospects? Robertson and Niemela are both legit prospects.


It's a legit offer, but the picks will be late 1st and 2nds. I think the prospects are B+. Vancouver can probably get a better level of prospect
18 janv. à 16 h 58
#20
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,228
Quoting: TMLBRIAN
Okay, basically my package but a 1st instead of a 2nd. I offered a b prospect and a 2nd. Thanks!


SDA as a B prospect is a stretch.
18 janv. à 16 h 59
#21
Days of our Hawks
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2021
Messages: 4,803
Mentions "j'aime": 1,993
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
I wouldn't do any of this.


Good because I don’t see any reason to do that Blackhawks trade either
Aussie_Blackhawk a aimé ceci.
18 janv. à 17 h 2
#22
Démarrer sujet
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: mai 2018
Messages: 2,220
Mentions "j'aime": 536
Quoting: NickC1988
SDA as a B prospect is a stretch.


As a Leafs fan and the person who made this post... I agree with this statement.... hahahaha - Swap SDA for a B prospect if Chicago doesn't view him as such.
18 janv. à 18 h 27
#23
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: oct. 2019
Messages: 3,404
Mentions "j'aime": 1,260
Quoting: kingjrb92
What's stopping Chicago from offering Campbell $6M+ is Seth Jone's extension kicking in, Dach needing a new contract, and paying Toews and Kane a combined $21M


We will have the capacity to have 7-8m in our goalie quite comfortably. Depending on what happens with our RFA's will determine if we have more or less flexibility but I'm expecting us to have some room to play with.
18 janv. à 19 h 19
#24
Painsince67
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2021
Messages: 172
Mentions "j'aime": 61
Quoting: NickC1988
Dach's next deal will barely be over $2M at the current clip he's on. The hawks could certainly afford Campbell. Both Toews and Kane have a year left on their deals and I'd expect both of them to take pay cuts (Also thinking it's possible Toews retires), so there's really no long term cap hits asides from Jones' extension.


Neither Kane nor Toews can take pay cuts until the summer of 2023 and Campbell is eligible to become a free agent this summer
19 janv. à 1 h 55
#25
Chicago
Avatar de l'utilisateur
Rejoint: juin 2015
Messages: 6,113
Mentions "j'aime": 2,228
Quoting: kingjrb92
Neither Kane nor Toews can take pay cuts until the summer of 2023 and Campbell is eligible to become a free agent this summer


They can still fit him into the team quite easily. And they'll have more room to add in 2023 as well.
 
Répondre
To create a post please Login or S'inscrire
Question:
Options:
Ajouter une option
Supprimer une option
Soumettre le sondage